These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36118938)

  • 1. Studying topic engagement and synergy among candidates for 2020 US Elections.
    Baxi MK; Sharma R; Mago V
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):136. PubMed ID: 36118938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 280 characters to the White House: predicting 2020 U.S. presidential elections from twitter data.
    Rizk R; Rizk D; Rizk F; Hsu S
    Comput Math Organ Theory; 2023 Mar; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 37360912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A large-scale sentiment analysis of tweets pertaining to the 2020 US presidential election.
    Ali RH; Pinto G; Lawrie E; Linstead EJ
    J Big Data; 2022; 9(1):79. PubMed ID: 35729897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. (Re)shaping online narratives: when bots promote the message of President Trump during his first impeachment.
    Galgoczy MC; Phatak A; Vinson D; Mago VK; Giabbanelli PJ
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2022; 8():e947. PubMed ID: 35494820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.
    Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E
    J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mapping moral language on US presidential primary campaigns reveals rhetorical networks of political division and unity.
    Hackenburg K; Brady WJ; Tsakiris M
    PNAS Nexus; 2023 Jun; 2(6):pgad189. PubMed ID: 37333765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success
    Gerstlé J; Nai A
    Eur J Commun; 2019 Aug; 34(4):410-444. PubMed ID: 31534293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of Twitter opinion trends with national polling aggregates: Hillary Clinton vs Donald Trump.
    Bovet A; Morone F; Makse HA
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):8673. PubMed ID: 29875364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elections, news cycles, and attention to disasters.
    Bright CF
    Disaster Prev Manag; 2017; 26(4):471-478. PubMed ID: 30443109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Indonesian presidential election sentiment: Dataset of response public before 2024.
    Firdaus AA; Yudhana A; Riadi I; Mahsun
    Data Brief; 2024 Feb; 52():109993. PubMed ID: 38226041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ideological Consumerism in Colombian Elections, 2015: Links Between Political Ideology, Twitter Activity, and Electoral Results.
    Correa JC; Camargo JE
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2017 Jan; 20(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 28080152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections.
    Flamino J; Galeazzi A; Feldman S; Macy MW; Cross B; Zhou Z; Serafino M; Bovet A; Makse HA; Szymanski BK
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Jun; 7(6):904-916. PubMed ID: 36914806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative framework to analyze convergence on Twitter electoral conversations.
    Cárdenas-Sánchez D; Sampayo AM; Rodríguez-Prieto M; Feged-Rivadeneira A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19062. PubMed ID: 36352010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
    Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who polarizes Twitter? Ideological polarization, partisan groups and strategic networked campaigning on Twitter during the 2017 and 2021 German Federal elections 'Bundestagswahlen'.
    Darius P
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):151. PubMed ID: 36246430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A 2 million-person, campaign-wide field experiment shows how digital advertising affects voter turnout.
    Aggarwal M; Allen J; Coppock A; Frankowski D; Messing S; Zhang K; Barnes J; Beasley A; Hantman H; Zheng S
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Mar; 7(3):332-341. PubMed ID: 36635584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The limited reach of fake news on Twitter during 2019 European elections.
    Cinelli M; Cresci S; Galeazzi A; Quattrociocchi W; Tesconi M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234689. PubMed ID: 32555659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The abortion issue in the 1980 elections.
    Granberg D; Burlison J
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(5):231-8. PubMed ID: 6653742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moral-Language Use by U.S. Political Elites.
    Wang SN; Inbar Y
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jan; 32(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 33306432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.