108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3611994)
1. Feasibility study of a statewide pathology-based cancer surveillance system in Minnesota. I. Information characteristics.
Bender AP; Jagger HG; Fraser J; Anderson W; Gatewood LC; Larkin S; Olsen G
J Med Syst; 1987 Feb; 11(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 3611994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using hospital discharge files to enhance cancer surveillance.
Penberthy L; McClish D; Pugh A; Smith W; Manning C; Retchin S
Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 158(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 12835284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving case ascertainment of a population-based birth defects registry in New York State using hospital discharge data.
Wang Y; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross PK; Druschel CM; Hwang SA
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):663-8. PubMed ID: 16240383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The evaluation of the data collection process for a multicenter, population-based, case-control design.
Wingo PA; Ory HW; Layde PM; Lee NC
Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Jul; 128(1):206-17. PubMed ID: 3381827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Retrospective census of cancers between 1994 and 2002 around the municipal solid waste incinerator of Gilly-sur-Isère].
Thabuis A; Schmitt M; Megas F; Fabres B
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2007 Dec; 55(6):426-32. PubMed ID: 18055149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of administrative hospital data for identifying incident pancreatic and periampullary cancer cases: a population-based study using linked cancer registry and administrative hospital data in New South Wales, Australia.
Creighton N; Walton R; Roder D; Aranda S; Currow D
BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011161. PubMed ID: 27371553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A decentralized, community-based design for statewide immunization registries in Minnesota.
LaVenture M; Wicklin N; Schillo T; Gatewood L
Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1997; ():388-92. PubMed ID: 9357654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Completeness of case ascertainment in a Scottish regional cancer registry for the year 1992.
Brewster DH; Crichton J; Harvey JC; Dawson G
Public Health; 1997 Sep; 111(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 9308385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ascertainment of cancer in longitudinal research: The concordance between the Rotterdam Study and the Netherlands Cancer Registry.
van der Willik KD; Ruiter R; van Rooij FJA; Verkroost-van Heemst J; Hogewoning SJ; Timmermans KCAA; Visser O; Schagen SB; Ikram MA; Stricker BHC
Int J Cancer; 2020 Aug; 147(3):633-640. PubMed ID: 31642518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identifying incident colorectal and lung cancer cases in health service utilisation databases in Australia: a validation study.
Goldsbury D; Weber M; Yap S; Banks E; O'Connell DL; Canfell K
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Feb; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28241763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Record linkage with cryptographic identification data in a population-based cancer registry. Development, implementation and error rates].
Krieg V; Hense HW; Lehnert M; Mattauch V
Gesundheitswesen; 2001 Jun; 63(6):376-82. PubMed ID: 11467220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancer registration: a feasibility study in northern Italy. The Collaborative Group of Pathologists for Cancer Registration in Verona.
Rodella S; Picoco C; Stanzial F; Turazza M; Donati LF
Eur J Cancer; 1994; 30A(8):1128-33. PubMed ID: 7654444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.
; Busco S; Buzzoni C; Mallone S; Trama A; Castaing M; Bella F; Amodio R; Bizzoco S; Cassetti T; Cirilli C; Cusimano R; De Angelis R; Fusco M; Gatta G; Gennaro V; Giacomin A; Giorgi Rossi P; Mangone L; Mannino S; Rossi S; Pierannunzio D; Tavilla A; Tognazzo S; Tumino R; Vicentini M; Vitale MF; Crocetti E; Dal Maso L
Epidemiol Prev; 2016; 40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. PubMed ID: 26951748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of case ascertainment in the Michigan Stroke Registry.
Reeves MJ; Nickles AV; Roberts S; Hurst R; Lyon-Callo S
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2014 Sep; 7(5):757-63. PubMed ID: 25160841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel method of assessing completeness of tumor registration.
Heiberger RM; Miller CL; Feigl P; Lane WW; Glaefke G
Cancer; 1983 Jun; 51(12):2362-6. PubMed ID: 6850515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minnesota population cancer risk.
Kennedy BJ; Bushhouse SA; Bender AP
Cancer; 1994 Feb; 73(3):724-9. PubMed ID: 8299096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A high positive predictive value algorithm using hospital administrative data identified incident cancer cases.
Baldi I; Vicari P; Di Cuonzo D; Zanetti R; Pagano E; Rosato R; Sacerdote C; Segnan N; Merletti F; Ciccone G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):373-9. PubMed ID: 18313562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cancer registry enrichment via linkage with hospital-based electronic medical records: a pilot investigation.
Hernandez MN; Voti L; Feldman JD; Tannenbaum SL; Scharber W; Mackinnon JA; Lee DJ; Huang YX
J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 23778697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Innovative Approach to Improve Completeness of Treatment and Other Key Data Elements in a Population-Based Cancer Registry: A15-Month Data Submission.
Hsieh MC; Mumphrey B; Pareti L; Yi Y; Wu XC
J Registry Manag; 2017; 44(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 29611688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a feasibility study for a statewide cancer surveillance system in Minnesota.
Bender A
Minn Med; 1982 Sep; 65(9):571-3. PubMed ID: 7177093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
