107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3611994)
21. Electronic capture and communication of synoptic cancer data elements from pathology reports: results of the Reporting Pathology Protocols 2 (RPP2) project.
Hassell L; Aldinger W; Moody C; Winters S; Gerlach K; Schwenn M; Perriello D
J Registry Manag; 2009; 36(4):117-24; quiz 163-5. PubMed ID: 20795553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Completeness of American Cancer Registry Treatment Data: implications for quality of care research.
Mallin K; Palis BE; Watroba N; Stewart AK; Walczak D; Singer J; Barron J; Blumenthal W; Haydu G; Edge SB
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Mar; 216(3):428-37. PubMed ID: 23357724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Minnesota clinics' adoption, use and exchange of electronic health information.
Soderberg K; Laventure M
Minn Med; 2013 Sep; 96(9):45-8. PubMed ID: 24494362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The completeness and timeliness of cancer registration and the implications for measuring cancer burden.
Donnelly C; Cairnduff V; Chen JJ; Kearney T; Fitzpatrick D; Fox C; Gavin A
Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 49():101-107. PubMed ID: 28600946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The relative contribution of data sources to a birth defects registry utilizing passive multisource ascertainment methods: does a smaller birth defects case ascertainment net lead to overall or disproportionate loss?
Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Block S; Bailey M; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS
J Registry Manag; 2011; 38(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 22097703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment.
Edwards BK; Brown ML; Wingo PA; Howe HL; Ward E; Ries LA; Schrag D; Jamison PM; Jemal A; Wu XC; Friedman C; Harlan L; Warren J; Anderson RN; Pickle LW
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Oct; 97(19):1407-27. PubMed ID: 16204691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Improving cancer incidence estimates for American Indians in Minnesota.
Partin MR; Rith-Najarian SJ; Slater JS; Korn JE; Cobb N; Soler JT
Am J Public Health; 1999 Nov; 89(11):1673-7. PubMed ID: 10553387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Methodological issues in linking study participants to Australian cancer registries using different methods: lessons from a cohort study.
Hoving JL; Del Monaco A; MacFarlane E; Fritschi L; Benke G; McKenzie D; Sim M
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2005 Aug; 29(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 16222937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Using personal health insurance numbers to link the Canadian Cancer Registry and the Discharge Abstract Database.
Zakaria D; Trudeau R; Sanmartin C; Murison P; Carrière G; MacIntyre M; Turner D; Wagar B; King MJ; Vriends K; Woods R; Lockwood G; Louchini R
Health Rep; 2015 Jun; 26(6):3-11. PubMed ID: 26086334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Feasibility of linking population-based cancer registries and cancer center biorepositories.
McCusker ME; Cress RD; Allen M; Fernandez-Ami A; Gandour-Edwards R
Biopreserv Biobank; 2012 Oct; 10(5):416-20. PubMed ID: 24845042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Study of completeness of the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) program case ascertainment by hospital size and casefinding source.
Zippin C; Lum D
Health Rep; 1993; 5(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 8334243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Claims data linked to hospital registry data enhance evaluation of the quality of care of breast cancer.
Meguerditchian AN; Stewart A; Roistacher J; Watroba N; Cropp M; Edge SB
J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jun; 101(7):593-9. PubMed ID: 20461766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Record linkage of a large clinical practice patient cohort with the Cancer Registry Schleswig-Holstein].
Obi N; Waldmann A; Babaev V; Katalinic A
Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Jul; 73(7):452-8. PubMed ID: 20549597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The capture-recapture method for estimation of cancer registry completeness: a useful tool?
Schouten LJ; Straatman H; Kiemeney LA; Gimbrère CH; Verbeek AL
Int J Epidemiol; 1994 Dec; 23(6):1111-6. PubMed ID: 7721510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs?
Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Linkage of Indiana State Cancer Registry and Indiana Network for Patient Care Data.
Ruppert LP; He J; Martin J; Eckert G; Ouyang F; Church A; Dexter P; Hui S; Haggstrom D
J Registry Manag; 2016; 43(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 29595920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [The importance of the common cancer registry for the identification of cancer cases in the EPIC Potsdam-study -- results of the first record linkage].
Bergmann MM; Noethlings U; Eisinger B; Streller B; Quehl A; Walter D; Lahmann PH; Boeing H
Gesundheitswesen; 2004; 66(8-9):475-81. PubMed ID: 15372347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Benefits and limitations of pathology databases to cancer registries.
Brewster DH; Crichton J; Harvey JC; Dawson G; Nairn ER
J Clin Pathol; 1996 Nov; 49(11):947-9. PubMed ID: 8944619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Cancer incidence estimation by hospital discharge flow as compared with cancer registries data].
Ferretti S; Guzzinati S; Zambon P; Manneschi G; Crocetti E; Falcini F; Giorgetti S; Cirilli C; Pirani M; Mangone L; Di Felice E; Del Lisi V; Sgargi P; Buzzoni C; Russo A; Paci E
Epidemiol Prev; 2009; 33(4-5):147-53. PubMed ID: 20124629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Linking cancer registry and hospital discharge data for treatment surveillance.
Lin G; Ma J; Zhang L; Qu M
Health Informatics J; 2013 Jun; 19(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 23715212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
