These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3612027)

  • 1. Mechanisms underlying retarded emergence of conditioned responding following inhibitory training: evidence for the comparator hypothesis.
    Schachtman TR; Brown AM; Gordon EL; Catterson DA; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Jul; 13(3):310-22. PubMed ID: 3612027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The comparator hypothesis of conditioned response generation: manifest conditioned excitation and inhibition as a function of relative excitatory strengths of CS and conditioning context at the time of testing.
    Kasprow WJ; Schachtman TR; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Oct; 13(4):395-406. PubMed ID: 3668477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparator mechanisms and conditioned inhibition: conditioned stimulus preexposure disrupts Pavlovian conditioned inhibition but not explicitly unpaired inhibition.
    Friedman BX; Blaisdell AP; Escobar M; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1998 Oct; 24(4):453-66. PubMed ID: 9805791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Associative effects of US preexposure: modulation of conditioned responding by an excitatory training context.
    Matzel LD; Brown AM; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Jan; 13(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 3819652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear: tests for the associative value of the context.
    Bouton ME; King DA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1983 Jul; 9(3):248-65. PubMed ID: 6886630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responding to a conditioned stimulus depends on the current associative status of other cues present during training of that specific stimulus.
    Miller RR; Barnet RC; Grahame NJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 1619393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of contingency violations on the extinction of a conditioned fear inhibitor and a conditioned fear excitor.
    DeVito PL; Fowler H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Apr; 12(2):99-115. PubMed ID: 3701265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Latent inhibition of a CS during CS-US pairings.
    Hall G; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1979 Jan; 5(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 528877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing response generation rules.
    Miller RR; Schachtman TR; Matzel LD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Oct; 14(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 3183581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in pain reactivity induced by unconditioned and conditioned excitatory and inhibitory stimuli.
    Lysle DT; Fowler H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Oct; 14(4):376-89. PubMed ID: 3183578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. US habituation, like CS extinction, produces a decrement in conditioned fear responding that is NMDA dependent and subject to renewal and reinstatement.
    Storsve AB; McNally GP; Richardson R
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2010 May; 93(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 20074653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conditioned inhibition produced by extinction-mediated recovery from the relative stimulus validity effect: a test of acquisition and performance models of empirical retrospective revaluation.
    Blaisdell AP; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jan; 27(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 11199514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An assessment of context-specificity of the CS-preexposure effect in Pavlovian excitatory and inhibitory conditioning.
    Nakajima S; Takahashi K; Blaisdell AP
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jul; 73(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 16675159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exposure to the unconditioned stimulus alone: effects on retention and acquisition of conditioned suppression.
    Randich A; Haggard D
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1983 Apr; 9(2):147-59. PubMed ID: 6842134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Malleability of conditioned associations: path dependence.
    Brown-Su AM; Matzel LD; Gordon EL; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Oct; 12(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 3772306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Timing during inhibitory conditioning.
    Williams DA; Johns KW; Brindas M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 18426306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potentiation of the acoustic startle response by a conditioned stimulus paired with acoustic startle stimulus in rats.
    Leaton RN; Cranney J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jul; 16(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 2398339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of blocking and conditioned inhibition to a CS signaling a decrease in US intensity.
    Wagner AR; Mazur JE; Donegan NH; Pfautz PL
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1980 Oct; 6(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 7430953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association between the elements of a bivalent compound stimulus.
    Cunningham CL
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Oct; 7(4):425-36. PubMed ID: 7288371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.
    Stout SC; Chang R; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jan; 29(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 12561131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.