113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36120645)
1. Cranial reconstruction evaluation - comparison of European statistical shape model performance on Chinese dataset.
Fuessinger MA; Metzger MC; Rothweiler R; Brandenburg LS; Schlager S
Bone Rep; 2022 Dec; 17():101611. PubMed ID: 36120645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Planning of skull reconstruction based on a statistical shape model combined with geometric morphometrics.
Fuessinger MA; Schwarz S; Cornelius CP; Metzger MC; Ellis E; Probst F; Semper-Hogg W; Gass M; Schlager S
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Apr; 13(4):519-529. PubMed ID: 29080945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Virtual reconstruction of bilateral midfacial defects by using statistical shape modeling.
Fuessinger MA; Schwarz S; Neubauer J; Cornelius CP; Gass M; Poxleitner P; Zimmerer R; Metzger MC; Schlager S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1054-1059. PubMed ID: 30982558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virtual reconstruction of orbital floor defects using a statistical shape model.
Gass M; Füßinger MA; Metzger MC; Schwarz S; Bähr JD; Brandenburg L; Weingart J; Schlager S
J Anat; 2022 Feb; 240(2):323-329. PubMed ID: 34658032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual reconstruction of midface defects using statistical shape models.
Semper-Hogg W; Fuessinger MA; Schwarz S; Ellis E; Cornelius CP; Probst F; Metzger MC; Schlager S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 45(4):461-466. PubMed ID: 28202219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical Shape Modeling Approach to Predict Missing Scapular Bone.
Salhi A; Burdin V; Boutillon A; Brochard S; Mutsvangwa T; Borotikar B
Ann Biomed Eng; 2020 Jan; 48(1):367-379. PubMed ID: 31512013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thickness accuracy of virtually designed patient-specific implants for large neurocranial defects.
Wittner C; Borowski M; Pirl L; Kastner J; Schrempf A; Schäfer U; Trieb K; Senck S
J Anat; 2021 Oct; 239(4):755-770. PubMed ID: 34086982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 2D/3D reconstruction of the distal femur using statistical shape models addressing personalized surgical instruments in knee arthroplasty: A feasibility analysis.
Cerveri P; Sacco C; Olgiati G; Manzotti A; Baroni G
Int J Med Robot; 2017 Dec; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 28387436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deep learning for cranioplasty in clinical practice: Going from synthetic to real patient data.
Kodym O; Španěl M; Herout A
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Oct; 137():104766. PubMed ID: 34425418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Craniofacial reconstruction using a combined statistical model of face shape and soft tissue depths: methodology and validation.
Claes P; Vandermeulen D; De Greef S; Willems G; Suetens P
Forensic Sci Int; 2006 May; 159 Suppl 1():S147-58. PubMed ID: 16540276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Back to the Roots: Reconstructing Large and Complex Cranial Defects using an Image-based Statistical Shape Model.
Li J; Ellis DG; Pepe A; Gsaxner C; Aizenberg MR; Kleesiek J; Egger J
J Med Syst; 2024 May; 48(1):55. PubMed ID: 38780820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-Dimensional Subject-Specific Knee Shape Reconstruction with Asynchronous Fluoroscopy Images Using Statistical Shape Modeling.
Lu HY; Shih KS; Lin CC; Lu TW; Li SY; Kuo HW; Hsu HC
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():736420. PubMed ID: 34746102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-Dimensional Virtual Reconstruction of External Nasal Defects Based on Facial Mesh Generation Network.
Qin Q; Li Y; Wen A; Zhu Y; Gao Z; Shan S; Wu H; Zhao Y; Wang Y
Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 38535024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Planning of mandibular reconstructions based on statistical shape models.
Raith S; Wolff S; Steiner T; Modabber A; Weber M; Hölzle F; Fischer H
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 27393280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonunion scaphoid bone shape prediction using iterative kernel principal polynomial shape analysis.
Zhu J; Zhao J; Luo X; Hua Z
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38497549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtual reconstruction of midfacial bone defect based on generative adversarial network.
Xiong YT; Zeng W; Xu L; Guo JX; Liu C; Chen JT; Du XY; Tang W
Head Face Med; 2022 Jun; 18(1):19. PubMed ID: 35761334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Virtual reconstruction and clinical verification of maxillary defect based on deep learning].
Xiong YT; Xu L; Zeng W; Liu C; Guo JX; Tang W
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Oct; 57(10):1029-1035. PubMed ID: 36266076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reconstruction of dental roots for implant planning purposes: a feasibility study.
Brandenburg LS; Berger L; Schwarz SJ; Meine H; Weingart JV; Steybe D; Spies BC; Burkhardt F; Schlager S; Metzger MC
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2022 Oct; 17(10):1957-1968. PubMed ID: 35902422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical shape model-based reconstruction of a scaled, patient-specific surface model of the pelvis from a single standard AP x-ray radiograph.
Zheng G
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1424-39. PubMed ID: 20443464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Restoration of the Patient-Specific Anatomy of the Proximal and Distal Parts of the Humerus: Statistical Shape Modeling Versus Contralateral Registration Method.
Vlachopoulos L; Lüthi M; Carrillo F; Gerber C; Székely G; Fürnstahl P
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Apr; 100(8):e50. PubMed ID: 29664855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
