These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36121040)

  • 21. Binaural summation, binaural unmasking and fluctuating masker benefit in bimodal and bilateral adult cochlear implant users.
    de Graaff F; Eikelboom RH; Sucher C; Kramer SE; Smits C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 Sep; 22(5):245-256. PubMed ID: 33832408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Feasibility and Reliability of a Digits-in-Noise Test in the Clinical Follow-Up of Children With Mild to Profound Hearing Loss.
    Vroegop J; Rodenburg-Vlot M; Goedegebure A; Doorduin A; Homans N; van der Schroeff M
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):973-981. PubMed ID: 33577216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using the Digits-In-Noise Test to Estimate Age-Related Hearing Loss.
    Koole A; Nagtegaal AP; Homans NC; Hofman A; Baatenburg de Jong RJ; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 26871876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digits-in-noise test in Brazilian Portuguese: how demographic and socioeconomic variables influence normal-hearing subjects.
    Barros VV; Nunes-Araújo ADDS; Silva ARXD; Cavalcanti HG; Ferrari DV; Balen SA
    Codas; 2022; 34(6):e20210274. PubMed ID: 35544883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of a synthetic version of the digits-in-noise test and its characteristics in CI recipients.
    Kropp MH; Hocke T; Agha-Mir-Salim P; Müller A
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Jul; 60(7):507-513. PubMed ID: 33124508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Binaural pre-processing for contralateral sound field attenuation can improve speech-in-noise intelligibility for bilateral hearing-aid users.
    San-Victoriano FM; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2023 May; 432():108743. PubMed ID: 37003080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Discrimination of degrees of auditory performance from the digits-in-noise test based on hearing status.
    Armstrong NM; Oosterloo BC; Croll PH; Ikram MA; Goedegebure A
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 59(12):897-904. PubMed ID: 32673129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Unilateral and Bilateral Audiological Benefit With an Adhesively Attached, Noninvasive Bone Conduction Hearing System.
    Gawliczek T; Munzinger F; Anschuetz L; Caversaccio M; Kompis M; Wimmer W
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep; 39(8):1025-1030. PubMed ID: 30015748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hearing in Noise With Unilateral Versus Bilateral Bone Conduction Hearing Aids in Adults With Pseudo-conductive Hearing Loss.
    Hilly O; Sokolov M; Finkel RB; Zavdy O; Shemesh R; Attias J
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Mar; 41(3):379-385. PubMed ID: 31917768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automated Speech Audiometry: Can It Work Using Open-Source Pre-Trained Kaldi-NL Automatic Speech Recognition?
    Araiza-Illan G; Meyer L; Truong KP; Başkent D
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241229057. PubMed ID: 38483979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of Audibility and Suprathreshold Deficits on Speech Recognition for Listeners With Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Bost TJM; Versfeld NJ; Goverts ST
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 31242137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 3: test sensitivity for uncontrolled parameters in domestic usage.
    Leensen MC; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):658-69. PubMed ID: 23819619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing speech recognition abilities with digits in noise in cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Kaandorp MW; Smits C; Merkus P; Goverts ST; Festen JM
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 25156097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development and validation of a smartphone-based digits-in-noise hearing test in South African English.
    Potgieter JM; Swanepoel de W; Myburgh HC; Hopper TC; Smits C
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 27121117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.
    Priwin C; Jönsson R; Hultcrantz M; Granström G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 71(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 17092570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Xu K; Willis S; Gopen Q; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Speech recognition in background noise: monaural versus binaural listening conditions in normal-hearing patients.
    Persson P; Harder H; Arlinger S; Magnuson B
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 Sep; 22(5):625-30. PubMed ID: 11568669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.