These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3612215)

  • 1. The effect of cuff pressure deflation rate on accuracy in indirect measurement of blood pressure with the auscultatory method.
    Yong PG; Geddes LA
    J Clin Monit; 1987 Jul; 3(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 3612215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of four indirect methods of blood pressure measurement, with hemodynamic correlations.
    Gravlee GP; Brockschmidt JK
    J Clin Monit; 1990 Oct; 6(4):284-98. PubMed ID: 2230858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How important is the recommended slow cuff pressure deflation rate for blood pressure measurement?
    Zheng D; Amoore JN; Mieke S; Murray A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Oct; 39(10):2584-91. PubMed ID: 21735319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of short-term blood pressure variability on blood pressure determinations.
    Bos WJ; van Goudoever J; van Montfrans GA; Wesseling KH
    Hypertension; 1992 Jun; 19(6 Pt 1):606-9. PubMed ID: 1592455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biases in the measurement of arterial pressure.
    Finnie KJ; Watts DG; Armstrong PW
    Crit Care Med; 1984 Nov; 12(11):965-8. PubMed ID: 6499482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of mechanical behaviour of the brachial artery on blood pressure measurement during both cuff inflation and cuff deflation.
    Zheng D; Pan F; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2013 Oct; 18(5):265-71. PubMed ID: 23924706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time poor: rushing decreases the accuracy and reliability of blood pressure measurement technique in pregnancy.
    Reinders LW; Mos CN; Thornton C; Ogle R; Makris A; Child A; Hennessy A
    Hypertens Pregnancy; 2006; 25(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 16867915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The importance of cuff width in measurement of blood pressure indirectly.
    Geddes LA; Tivey R
    Cardiovasc Res Cent Bull; 1976; 14(3):69-79. PubMed ID: 1260792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the position or contact pressure of the stethoscope make any difference to clinical blood pressure measurements: an observational study.
    Pan F; Zheng D; He P; Murray A
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2014 Dec; 93(29):e301. PubMed ID: 25546675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single cuff comparison of two methods for indirect measurement of arterial blood pressure: standard auscultatory method versus automatic oscillometric method.
    Pessenhofer H
    Basic Res Cardiol; 1986; 81(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 3718426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation of the Korotkoff Stethoscope Sounds During Blood Pressure Measurement: Analysis Using a Convolutional Neural Network.
    Pan F; He P; Liu C; Li T; Murray A; Zheng D
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2017 Nov; 21(6):1593-1598. PubMed ID: 29136608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of cuff inflation and cuff deflation brachial sphygmomanometry with intra-arterial blood pressure as reference.
    Celler BG; Yong A; Rubenis I; Butlin M; Argha A; Rehan R; Avolio A
    J Hypertens; 2024 Jun; 42(6):968-976. PubMed ID: 38230615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the sphygmooscillographic method with the direct and auscultatory methods of measuring blood pressure.
    Sapinski A
    J Clin Monit; 1994 Nov; 10(6):373-6. PubMed ID: 7836971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wideband external pulse recording during cuff deflation: a new technique for evaluation of the arterial pressure pulse and measurement of blood pressure.
    Blank SG; West JE; Müller FB; Cody RJ; Harshfield GA; Pecker MS; Laragh JH; Pickering TG
    Circulation; 1988 Jun; 77(6):1297-305. PubMed ID: 3370770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of auscultatory gaps with wideband external pulse recording.
    Blank SG; West JE; Müller FB; Pecker MS; Laragh JH; Pickering TG
    Hypertension; 1991 Feb; 17(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 1991655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The changes in pulse transit time at specific cuff pressures during inflation and deflation.
    Liu Y; Poon CC; Zhang YT
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():6404-5. PubMed ID: 17947191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods.
    Weaver MG; Park MK; Lee DH
    Am J Dis Child; 1990 Aug; 144(8):911-4. PubMed ID: 2378339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bilateral simultaneous indirect systolic blood pressure measurements.
    Goldhill DR
    Cardiovasc Res; 1986 Oct; 20(10):774-7. PubMed ID: 3791343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative accuracy of three automated techniques in the noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure in men.
    Lehmann KG; Gelman JA; Weber MA; Lafrades A
    Am J Cardiol; 1998 Apr; 81(8):1004-12. PubMed ID: 9576161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.