311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36123093)
1. PEDAL protocol: a prospective single-arm paired comparison of multiparametric MRI and 18F-DCPFyl PSMA PET/CT to diagnose prostate cancer.
Tran V; Hong A; Sutherland T; Taubman K; Lee SF; Lenaghan D; Sethi K; Corcoran NM; Lawrentschuk N; Woo H; Tarlinton L; Bolton D; Spelman T; Thomas L; Booth R; Hegarty J; Perry E; Wong LM
BMJ Open; 2022 Sep; 12(9):e061815. PubMed ID: 36123093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fluorine-18-labelled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose and Localise Prostate Cancer. A Prospective Single-arm Paired Comparison (PEDAL).
Wong LM; Sutherland T; Perry E; Tran V; Spelman T; Corcoran N; Lawrentschuk N; Woo H; Lenaghan D; Buchan N; Bax K; Symons J; Saeed Goolam A; Chalasani V; Hegarty J; Thomas L; Christov A; Ng M; Khanani H; Lee SF; Taubman K; Tarlinton L
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38281891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protocol for the PRIMARY clinical trial, a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study of the additive diagnostic value of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic setting for men being investigated for prostate cancer.
Amin A; Blazevski A; Thompson J; Scheltema MJ; Hofman MS; Murphy D; Lawrentschuk N; Sathianathen N; Kapoor J; Woo HH; Chalasani V; Rasiah K; van Leeuwen PJ; Tang R; Cusick T; Stricker P; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):515-524. PubMed ID: 31957122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Trial Protocol for PRIMARY2: A Multicentre, Phase 3, Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating the Additive Diagnostic Value of [
Buteau JP; Moon D; Fahey MT; Roberts MJ; Thompson J; Murphy DG; Papa N; Mitchell C; De Abreu Lourenco R; Dhillon HM; Kasivisvanathan V; Francis RJ; Stricker P; Agrawal S; O'Brien J; McVey A; Sharma G; Levy S; Ayati N; Nguyen A; Lee SF; Pattison DA; Sivaratnam D; Frydenberg M; Du Y; Titus J; Lee ST; Ischia J; Jack G; Hofman MS; Emmett L
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Jun; 7(3):544-552. PubMed ID: 38061976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Head-to-Head Comparison of
Exterkate L; Hermsen R; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Prette JF; Baas DJH; Somford DM; van Basten JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):574-581. PubMed ID: 37230883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Head-to-Head Comparison of
Sonni I; Felker ER; Lenis AT; Sisk AE; Bahri S; Allen-Auerbach M; Armstrong WR; Suvannarerg V; Tubtawee T; Grogan T; Elashoff D; Eiber M; Raman SS; Czernin J; Reiter RE; Calais J
J Nucl Med; 2022 Jun; 63(6):847-854. PubMed ID: 34649942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective Evaluation of
Gaur S; Mena E; Harmon SA; Lindenberg ML; Adler S; Ton AT; Shih JH; Mehralivand S; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Mease RC; Pomper MG; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Sep; 215(3):652-659. PubMed ID: 32755168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiparametric MRI and
Privé BM; Israël B; Janssen MJR; van der Leest MMG; de Rooij M; van Ipenburg JA; Jonker M; Peters SMB; de Groot M; Zámecnik P; Hoepping A; Bomers JG; Gotthardt M; Sedelaar JPM; Barentsz JO; van Oort IM; Nagarajah J
Radiology; 2024 May; 311(2):e231879. PubMed ID: 38771185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Synchronous vs independent reading of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to improve diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Doan P; Counter W; Papa N; Sheehan-Dare G; Ho B; Lee J; Liu V; Thompson JE; Agrawal S; Roberts MJ; Buteau J; Hofman MS; Moon D; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy D; Stricker PD; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2023 May; 131(5):588-595. PubMed ID: 36371669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of
Scheltema MJ; Chang JI; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Nguyen QA; Ho B; Delprado W; Lee J; Thompson JE; Cusick T; Spriensma AS; Siriwardana AR; Yuen C; Kooner R; Hruby G; O'Neill G; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():42-49. PubMed ID: 31287613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection and localisation of primary prostate cancer using
Kalapara AA; Nzenza T; Pan HYC; Ballok Z; Ramdave S; O'Sullivan R; Ryan A; Cherk M; Hofman MS; Konety BR; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D; Murphy DG; Grummet JP; Frydenberg M
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 31260602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of PSMA PET/CT versus mpMRI in Patients with a High Suspicion of Prostate Cancer and Previously Negative Biopsy: A Prospective Trial (PROSPET-BX).
Lopci E; Lazzeri M; Colombo P; Casale P; Buffi NM; Saita A; Peschechera R; Hurle R; Marzo K; Leonardi L; Morenghi E; Balzarini L; Disconzi L; Guazzoni G; Chiti A; Lughezzani G
Urol Int; 2023; 107(5):433-439. PubMed ID: 36724746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility and Accuracy of the PRIMARY Score on PSMA PET and of PI-RADS on Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Within a Real-World Database.
Emmett L; Papa N; Counter W; Calais J; Barbato F; Burger I; Eiber M; Roberts MJ; Agrawal S; Franklin A; Xue A; Rasiah K; John N; Moon D; Frydenberg M; Yaxley J; Stricker P; Wong K; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; Ho B; Nguyen A; Liu V; Lee J; Hsiao E; Sutherland T; Perry E; Fendler WP; Hope TA
J Nucl Med; 2024 Jan; 65(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 38050155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pilot study of the diagnostic utility of
Vlachostergios PJ; Niaz MJ; Thomas C; Christos PJ; Osborne JR; Margolis DJA; Khani F; Bander NH; Scherr DS; Tagawa ST
Prostate; 2022 Mar; 82(4):483-492. PubMed ID: 34985786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined Utility of
Kalapara AA; Ballok ZE; Ramdave S; O'Sullivan R; Ryan A; Konety B; Grummet JP; Frydenberg M
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 5(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 33741337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
Gondoputro W; Doan P; Katelaris A; Scheltema MJ; Geboers B; Agrawal S; Liu Z; Yaxley J; Savdie R; Rasiah K; Frydenberg M; Roberts MJ; Malouf D; Wong D; Shnier R; Delprado W; Emmett L; Stricker PD; Thompson J
Transl Androl Urol; 2023 Oct; 12(10):1598-1606. PubMed ID: 37969779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The PRIMARY Score: Using Intraprostatic
Emmett L; Papa N; Buteau J; Ho B; Liu V; Roberts M; Thompson J; Moon D; Sheehan-Dare G; Alghazo O; Agrawal S; Murphy D; Stricker P; Hope TA; Hofman MS
J Nucl Med; 2022 Nov; 63(11):1644-1650. PubMed ID: 35301240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The CONFIRM trial protocol: the utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography in active surveillance for prostate cancer.
Bagguley D; Harewood L; McKenzie D; Ptasznik G; Ong S; Chengodu T; Woon D; Sim K; Sheldon J; Lawrentschuk N
BJU Int; 2024 Apr; 133 Suppl 4():27-36. PubMed ID: 37904302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
