114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36123552)
1. Distinct-Cluster Tree-Child Phylogenetic Networks and Possible Uses to Study Polyploidy.
Willson SJ
Bull Math Biol; 2022 Sep; 84(11):125. PubMed ID: 36123552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Merging Arcs to Produce Acyclic Phylogenetic Networks and Normal Networks.
Willson SJ
Bull Math Biol; 2022 Jan; 84(2):26. PubMed ID: 34982266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Autopolyploidy, Allopolyploidy, and Phylogenetic Networks with Horizontal Arcs.
Huber KT; Maher LJ
Bull Math Biol; 2023 Apr; 85(5):40. PubMed ID: 37022524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Forest-Based Networks.
Huber KT; Moulton V; Scholz GE
Bull Math Biol; 2022 Sep; 84(10):119. PubMed ID: 36107279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Properties of normal phylogenetic networks.
Willson SJ
Bull Math Biol; 2010 Feb; 72(2):340-58. PubMed ID: 19789927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reconciling event-labeled gene trees with MUL-trees and species networks.
Hellmuth M; Huber KT; Moulton V
J Math Biol; 2019 Oct; 79(5):1885-1925. PubMed ID: 31410552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phylogenetic networks that display a tree twice.
Cordue P; Linz S; Semple C
Bull Math Biol; 2014 Oct; 76(10):2664-79. PubMed ID: 25245396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Orchard Networks are Trees with Additional Horizontal Arcs.
van Iersel L; Janssen R; Jones M; Murakami Y
Bull Math Biol; 2022 Jun; 84(8):76. PubMed ID: 35727410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Restricted trees: simplifying networks with bottlenecks.
Willson SJ
Bull Math Biol; 2011 Oct; 73(10):2322-38. PubMed ID: 21359613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Orchard Networks Using Their Extended μ-Representation.
Cardona G; Pons JC; Ribas G; Coronado TM
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2024; 21(3):501-507. PubMed ID: 38300780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phylogenetic Networks with Every Embedded Phylogenetic Tree a Base Tree.
Semple C
Bull Math Biol; 2016 Jan; 78(1):132-7. PubMed ID: 26670315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tree-based networks: characterisations, metrics, and support trees.
Pons JC; Semple C; Steel M
J Math Biol; 2019 Mar; 78(4):899-918. PubMed ID: 30283985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Space of Tree-Based Phylogenetic Networks.
Fischer M; Francis A
Bull Math Biol; 2020 Jun; 82(6):70. PubMed ID: 32500263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tree-based unrooted nonbinary phylogenetic networks.
Hendriksen M
Math Biosci; 2018 Aug; 302():131-138. PubMed ID: 29932953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tree-average distances on certain phylogenetic networks have their weights uniquely determined.
Willson SJ
Algorithms Mol Biol; 2012; 7():13. PubMed ID: 22587565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Generation of Orchard and Tree-Child Networks.
Cardona G; Ribas G; Pons JC
Bull Math Biol; 2023 Dec; 86(1):10. PubMed ID: 38117376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phylogenetic networks from multi-labelled trees.
Huber KT; Moulton V
J Math Biol; 2006 May; 52(5):613-32. PubMed ID: 16463187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When is a Phylogenetic Network Simply an Amalgamation of Two Trees?
Semple C; Simpson J
Bull Math Biol; 2018 Sep; 80(9):2338-2348. PubMed ID: 29981001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonbinary Tree-Based Phylogenetic Networks.
Jetten L; van Iersel L
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2018; 15(1):205-217. PubMed ID: 27723601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reconstructing Tree-Child Networks from Reticulate-Edge-Deleted Subnetworks.
Murakami Y; van Iersel L; Janssen R; Jones M; Moulton V
Bull Math Biol; 2019 Oct; 81(10):3823-3863. PubMed ID: 31297691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
