These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36123631)

  • 21. [Principles of tests of hypotheses in statistics: alpha, beta and P].
    Riou B; Landais P
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 1998; 17(9):1168-80. PubMed ID: 9835991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In support of null hypothesis significance testing.
    Mogie M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Feb; 271 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S82-4. PubMed ID: 15101426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bayesian analysis for nurse and midwifery research: statistical, practical and ethical benefits.
    Malone HE; Coyne I
    Nurse Res; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36655468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Error Rates, Decisive Outcomes and Publication Bias with Several Inferential Methods.
    Hopkins WG; Batterham AM
    Sports Med; 2016 Oct; 46(10):1563-73. PubMed ID: 26971328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Real-time metabolic heat-based specific growth rate soft sensor for monitoring and control of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid production by Streptococcus zooepidemicus.
    Mohan N; Pavan SS; Jayakumar A; Rathinavelu S; Sivaprakasam S
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2022 Feb; 106(3):1079-1095. PubMed ID: 35076739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing significance in a Markov chain without mixing.
    Chikina M; Frieze A; Pegden W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Mar; 114(11):2860-2864. PubMed ID: 28246331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Statistical inference in abstracts of major medical and epidemiology journals 1975-2014: a systematic review.
    Stang A; Deckert M; Poole C; Rothman KJ
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 32(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 27858205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Some consequences of using the Horsfall-Barratt scale for hypothesis testing.
    Bock CH; Gottwald TR; Parker PE; Ferrandino F; Welham S; van den Bosch F; Parnell S
    Phytopathology; 2010 Oct; 100(10):1030-41. PubMed ID: 20839938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.
    García-Pérez MA
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Aug; 77(4):631-662. PubMed ID: 30034024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters.
    Grzybowski A; Mianowany M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Decision qualities of Bayes factor and p value-based hypothesis testing.
    Jeon M; De Boeck P
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):340-360. PubMed ID: 28594227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Popper and the problem of induction in epidemiology].
    Banegas JR; Rodríguez Artalejo F; del Rey Calero J
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2000; 74(4):327-39. PubMed ID: 11031841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Confidence intervals permit, but do not guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testing.
    Coulson M; Healey M; Fidler F; Cumming G
    Front Psychol; 2010; 1():26. PubMed ID: 21607077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Complementing the P-value from null-hypothesis significance testing with a Bayes factor from null-hypothesis Bayesian testing.
    Malone HE; Coyne I
    Nurse Res; 2020 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 33150776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. P > .05: The incorrect interpretation of "not significant" results is a significant problem.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Aug; 172(4):521-527. PubMed ID: 32570289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Functional domain mapping of the clathrin-associated adaptor medium chains mu1 and mu2.
    Aguilar RC; Ohno H; Roche KW; Bonifacino JS
    J Biol Chem; 1997 Oct; 272(43):27160-6. PubMed ID: 9341158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [11C]Carfentanil Binds Preferentially to μ-Opioid Receptor Subtype 1 Compared to Subtype 2.
    Eriksson O; Antoni G
    Mol Imaging; 2015; 14():476-83. PubMed ID: 26461068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The researcher and the consultant: a dialogue on null hypothesis significance testing.
    Stang A; Poole C
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 28(12):939-44. PubMed ID: 24233192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Autoradiographic analysis of mu1, mu2, and delta opioid binding in the central nervous system of C57BL/6BY and CXBK (opioid receptor-deficient) mice.
    Moskowitz AS; Goodman RR
    Brain Res; 1985 Dec; 360(1-2):108-16. PubMed ID: 3000528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The time course of adaptations in thermoneutral maximal oxygen consumption following heat acclimation.
    Waldron M; Jeffries O; Tallent J; Patterson S; Nevola V
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2019 Oct; 119(10):2391-2399. PubMed ID: 31512025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.