190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36124966)
1. Are Pathologists Self-Aware of Their Diagnostic Accuracy? Metacognition and the Diagnostic Process in Pathology.
Clayton DA; Eguchi MM; Kerr KF; Miyoshi K; Brunyé TT; Drew T; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Med Decis Making; 2023 Feb; 43(2):164-174. PubMed ID: 36124966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies.
Geller BM; Nelson HD; Weaver DL; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Onega T; Carney PA; Tosteson ANA; Elmore JG
J Clin Pathol; 2017 Nov; 70(11):947-953. PubMed ID: 28465449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association of Second-Opinion Strategies in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanocytic Lesions With Diagnostic Accuracy and Population-Level Costs.
Tosteson ANA; Tapp S; Titus LJ; Nelson HD; Longton GM; Bronson M; Pepe M; Carney PA; Onega T; Piepkorn MW; Knezevich SR; Barnhill R; Weinstock MA; Elder DE; Elmore JG
JAMA Dermatol; 2021 Sep; 157(9):1102-1106. PubMed ID: 34076664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.
Elmore JG; Longton GM; Carney PA; Geller BM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Nelson HD; Pepe MS; Allison KH; Schnitt SJ; O'Malley FP; Weaver DL
JAMA; 2015 Mar; 313(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 25781441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Machine learning classification of diagnostic accuracy in pathologists interpreting breast biopsies.
Brunyé TT; Booth K; Hendel D; Kerr KF; Shucard H; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2024 Feb; 31(3):552-562. PubMed ID: 38031453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathologists' diagnosis of invasive melanoma and melanocytic proliferations: observer accuracy and reproducibility study.
Elmore JG; Barnhill RL; Elder DE; Longton GM; Pepe MS; Reisch LM; Carney PA; Titus LJ; Nelson HD; Onega T; Tosteson ANA; Weinstock MA; Knezevich SR; Piepkorn MW
BMJ; 2017 Jun; 357():j2813. PubMed ID: 28659278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pathologist characteristics associated with accuracy and reproducibility of melanocytic skin lesion interpretation.
Elder DE; Piepkorn MW; Barnhill RL; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Knezevich SR; Pepe MS; Carney PA; Titus LJ; Onega T; Tosteson ANA; Weinstock MA; Elmore JG
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 Jul; 79(1):52-59.e5. PubMed ID: 29524584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study.
Elmore JG; Tosteson AN; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Geller B; Carney PA; Onega T; Allison KH; Jackson SL; Weaver DL
BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3069. PubMed ID: 27334105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy is in the eyes of the pathologist: The visual interpretive process and diagnostic accuracy with digital whole slide images.
Brunyé TT; Mercan E; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
J Biomed Inform; 2017 Feb; 66():171-179. PubMed ID: 28087402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Insight across mental disorders: A multifaceted metacognitive phenomenon.
Konstantakopoulos G
Psychiatriki; 2019; 30(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 31115349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variability in Pathologists' Interpretations of Individual Breast Biopsy Slides: A Population Perspective.
Elmore JG; Nelson HD; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Tosteson AN; Geller B; Onega T; Carney PA; Jackson SL; Allison KH; Weaver DL
Ann Intern Med; 2016 May; 164(10):649-55. PubMed ID: 26999810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.
Fitzgerald LM; Arvaneh M; Dockree PM
Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():264-277. PubMed ID: 28222381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An analysis of pathologists' viewing processes as they diagnose whole slide digital images.
Ghezloo F; Wang PC; Kerr KF; Brunyé TT; Drew T; Chang OH; Reisch LM; Shapiro LG; Elmore JG
J Pathol Inform; 2022; 13():100104. PubMed ID: 36268085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metacognitive knowledge and experience in recently diagnosed patients with bipolar disorder.
Torres IJ; Mackala SA; Kozicky JM; Yatham LN
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016 Sep; 38(7):730-44. PubMed ID: 27144722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing metacognition during or after basic-level and high-level cognitive tasks? A comparative study in a non-clinical sample.
Quiles C; Prouteau A; Verdoux H
Encephale; 2020 Feb; 46(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 31227210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reverse engineering of metacognition.
Guggenmos M
Elife; 2022 Sep; 11():. PubMed ID: 36107147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Region of interest identification and diagnostic agreement in breast pathology.
Nagarkar DB; Mercan E; Weaver DL; Brunyé TT; Carney PA; Rendi MH; Beck AH; Frederick PD; Shapiro LG; Elmore JG
Mod Pathol; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1004-11. PubMed ID: 27198567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How to measure metacognition.
Fleming SM; Lau HC
Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():443. PubMed ID: 25076880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of Second-Opinion Strategies for Diagnoses of Cutaneous Melanocytic Lesions.
Piepkorn MW; Longton GM; Reisch LM; Elder DE; Pepe MS; Kerr KF; Tosteson ANA; Nelson HD; Knezevich S; Radick A; Shucard H; Onega T; Carney PA; Elmore JG; Barnhill RL
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Oct; 2(10):e1912597. PubMed ID: 31603483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Peer review in toxicologic histopathology: its necessity, type and procedure].
Yoshitomi K
J Toxicol Sci; 1998 May; 23 Suppl 1():1-9. PubMed ID: 9617732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
