108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36125221)
41. Lung Cancer Screening CT: Sex-Specific Conversion Factors to Estimate Effective Radiation Dose From Dose-Length Product.
Cohen SL; Wang JJ; Chan N; O'Connell W; Shah R; Sanelli P; Raoof S
Chest; 2019 Dec; 156(6):1214-1222. PubMed ID: 31421112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Novel weight-based dose threshold for 18F-NaF PET-CT imaging using advanced PET-CT systems: a potential tool for reducing radiation burden.
Marafi F; Esmail A; Rasheed R; Alkandari F; Usmani S
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Sep; 38(9):764-770. PubMed ID: 28723715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography.
Geleijns J; Van Unnik JG; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Broerse JJ
Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):360-5. PubMed ID: 8173877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.
Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. In-patient to isocenter KERMA ratios in CT.
Huda W; Ogden KM; Lavallee RL; Roskopf ML; Scalzetti EM
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5362-9. PubMed ID: 21992356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of Radiation Exposure Associated With Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Follow-up Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography for Evaluating Endovascular Aneurysm Repairs.
Steuwe A; Geisbüsch P; Schulz CJ; Böckler D; Kauczor HU; Stiller W
J Endovasc Ther; 2016 Aug; 23(4):583-92. PubMed ID: 27193306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Evaluation of radiation dose in 64-row whole-body CT of multiple injured patients compared to 4-row CT].
Harrieder A; Geyer LL; Körner M; Deak Z; Wirth S; Reiser M; Linsenmaier U
Rofo; 2012 May; 184(5):443-9. PubMed ID: 22297914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Patient dose estimation for multi-detector-row CT examinations.
Nishizawa K; Mori S; Ohno M; Yanagawa N; Yoshida T; Akahane K; Iwai K; Wada S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17595212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: comparison with conventional tomography.
Ekestubbe A; Thilander A; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 8508935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Relationships between physical dose quantities and patient dose in CT.
Hidajat N; Mäurer J; Schröder RJ; Nunnemann A; Wolf M; Pauli K; Felix R
Br J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 72(858):556-61. PubMed ID: 10560337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Lens exposure during brain scans using multidetector row CT scanners: methods for estimation of lens dose.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Ishitake T; Abe T; Machida H; Takei R; Ibukuro K; Watanabe A; Kidouchi T; Nakano Y
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2010 May; 31(5):822-6. PubMed ID: 20044501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.
Turner AC; Zankl M; DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Zhang D; Angel E; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1816-25. PubMed ID: 20443504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Radiation exposure of patients in comprehensive computed tomography of the head in acute stroke.
Cohnen M; Wittsack HJ; Assadi S; Muskalla K; Ringelstein A; Poll LW; Saleh A; Mödder U
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2006 Sep; 27(8):1741-5. PubMed ID: 16971627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Radiation doses during computed tomography scan imaging in Hassan II Hospital, Agadir, Morocco.
Semghouli S; Amaoui B; Wakrim S
Pan Afr Med J; 2022; 41():290. PubMed ID: 35855039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. ESTIMATION OF EFFECTIVE DOSE OF DENTAL X-RAY DEVICES.
Qiang W; Qiang F; Lin L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jun; 183(4):417-421. PubMed ID: 30169836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Radiation exposure during paediatric CT in Sudan: CT dose, organ and effective doses.
Suliman II; Khamis HM; Ombada TH; Alzimami K; Alkhorayef M; Sulieman A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 25377750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Radiation dose from volumetric helical perfusion CT of the thorax, abdomen or pelvis.
Goh V; Dattani M; Farwell J; Shekhdar J; Tam E; Patel S; Juttla J; Simcock I; Stirling J; Mandeville H; Aird E; Hoskin P
Eur Radiol; 2011 May; 21(5):974-81. PubMed ID: 21085968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Verification of organ doses calculated by a dose monitoring software tool based on Monte Carlo Simulation in thoracic CT protocols.
Guberina N; Suntharalingam S; Naßenstein K; Forsting M; Theysohn J; Wetter A; Ringelstein A
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):322-326. PubMed ID: 28618854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. ESTIMATION OF RADIATION DOSES FROM ABDOMINAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANS.
Lahham A; ALMasri H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(2):235-240. PubMed ID: 29660098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
