These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36126028)

  • 1. Screen Content Video Quality Assessment Model Using Hybrid Spatiotemporal Features.
    Zeng H; Huang H; Hou J; Cao J; Wang Y; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():6175-6187. PubMed ID: 36126028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screen Content Video Quality Assessment: Subjective and Objective Study.
    Cheng S; Zeng H; Chen J; Hou J; Zhu J; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2020 Aug; PP():. PubMed ID: 32845839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blind prediction of natural video quality.
    Saad MA; Bovik AC; Charrier C
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Mar; 23(3):1352-65. PubMed ID: 24723532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatiotemporal Statistics for Video Quality Assessment.
    Xuelong Li ; Qun Guo ; Xiaoqiang Lu
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jul; 25(7):3329-3342. PubMed ID: 27187966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of video.
    Seshadrinathan K; Soundararajan R; Bovik AC; Cormack LK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Jun; 19(6):1427-41. PubMed ID: 20129861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FOVQA: Blind Foveated Video Quality Assessment.
    Jin Y; Patney A; Webb R; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():4571-4584. PubMed ID: 35767478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using the Temporal Statistics of Global and Local Image Features.
    Varga D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective Video Quality Assessment Combining Transfer Learning With CNN.
    Zhang Y; Gao X; He L; Lu W; He R
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2020 Aug; 31(8):2716-2730. PubMed ID: 30736007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Gabor Feature-Based Quality Assessment Model for the Screen Content Images.
    Ni Z; Zeng H; Ma L; Hou J; Chen J; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Sep; 27(9):4516-4528. PubMed ID: 29897876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Spatial and Geometry Feature-Based Quality Assessment Model for the Light Field Images.
    Huang H; Zeng H; Hou J; Chen J; Zhu J; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():3765-3779. PubMed ID: 35604974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motion tuned spatio-temporal quality assessment of natural videos.
    Seshadrinathan K; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Feb; 19(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 19846374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Study of the Subjective and Objective Quality of High Motion Live Streaming Videos.
    Shang Z; Ebenezer JP; Wu Y; Wei H; Sethuraman S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():1027-1041. PubMed ID: 34951848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RAVA: Region-Based Average Video Quality Assessment.
    Wu X; Cheng I; Zhou Z; Basu A
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34450931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the role of content in subjective video quality assessment.
    Mirkovic M; Vrgovic P; Culibrk D; Stefanovic D; Anderla A
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():625219. PubMed ID: 24523643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subjective and Objective Audio-Visual Quality Assessment for User Generated Content.
    Cao Y; Min X; Sun W; Zhai G
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2023; 32():3847-3861. PubMed ID: 37428674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Video quality assessment using motion-compensated temporal filtering and manifold feature similarity.
    Song Y; Yu M; Jiang G; Shao F; Peng Z
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175798. PubMed ID: 28445489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Salient motion features for video quality assessment.
    Ćulibrk D; Mirković M; Zlokolica V; Pokrić M; Crnojević V; Kukolj D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Apr; 20(4):948-58. PubMed ID: 20876020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blind Video Quality Assessment for Ultra-High-Definition Video Based on Super-Resolution and Deep Reinforcement Learning.
    Ying Z; Pan D; Shi P
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using Natural Spatiotemporal Scene Statistics.
    Dendi SVR; Channappayya SS
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2020 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 32275592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A convolutional neural network approach for objective video quality assessment.
    Le Callet P; Viard-Gaudin C; Barba D
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2006 Sep; 17(5):1316-27. PubMed ID: 17001990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.