These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36127258)

  • 1. Incorporation of team-based learning in the cadaveric anatomy laboratory: An overview.
    Chytas D; Noussios G; Paraskevas G; Demesticha T; Protogerou V; Salmas M
    Morphologie; 2023 Jun; 107(357):176-181. PubMed ID: 36127258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the use of cadaveric computed tomography in anatomy education: An overview.
    Chytas D; Salmas M; Paraskevas G; Demesticha T; Skandalakis GP; Lazaridis N; Katsourakis A; Noussios G
    Morphologie; 2022 Dec; 106(355):235-240. PubMed ID: 34479815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do virtual dissection tables add benefit to cadaver-based anatomy education? An evaluation.
    Chytas D; Salmas M; Noussios G; Paraskevas G; Protogerou V; Demesticha T; Vassiou A
    Morphologie; 2023 Mar; 107(356):1-5. PubMed ID: 35135673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes and satisfaction of two optional cadaveric dissection courses: A 3-year prospective study.
    Pais D; Casal D; Mascarenhas-Lemos L; Barata P; Moxham BJ; Goyri-O'Neill J
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):127-136. PubMed ID: 27483443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Impact of Team-Based Learning (TBL) on Physician Assistant Students' Academic Performance in Gross Anatomy.
    Isbell JA; Makeeva V; Caruthers K; Brooks WS
    J Physician Assist Educ; 2016 Sep; 27(3):126-130. PubMed ID: 27705982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomy Learning from Prosected Cadaveric Specimens Versus Plastic Models: A Comparative Study of Upper Limb Anatomy.
    Mitrousias V; Karachalios TS; Varitimidis SE; Natsis K; Arvanitis DL; Zibis AH
    Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Jul; 13(4):436-444. PubMed ID: 31251473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gestures-enhanced anatomy teaching: A literature review of an educational strategy with promising outcomes.
    Chytas D; Salmas M; Paraskevas G; Demesticha T; Kefaliakos A; Stavroulakis A; Noussios G
    Morphologie; 2023 Mar; 107(356):6-11. PubMed ID: 35659715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century.
    Ghosh SK
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jun; 10(3):286-299. PubMed ID: 27574911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptions of first-year medical students towards learning anatomy using cadaveric specimens through peer teaching.
    Agius A; Calleja N; Camenzuli C; Sultana R; Pullicino R; Zammit C; Calleja Agius J; Pomara C
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):346-357. PubMed ID: 29112798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory.
    Traser CJ; Hoffman LA; Seifert MF; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25288343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of modifications in cadaver dissection time on student learning outcomes in a doctor of physical therapy program.
    Donovan S; Negley KJ; Moran MW; Craig Pt JA
    Clin Anat; 2023 Mar; 36(2):224-233. PubMed ID: 36221220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound and cadaveric prosections as methods for teaching cardiac anatomy: a comparative study.
    Griksaitis MJ; Sawdon MA; Finn GM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 22069248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.
    Nwachukwu C; Lachman N; Pawlina W
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 24799441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of the use of plastination in anatomy education: current evidence.
    Chytas D; Piagkou M; Johnson EO; Tsakotos G; Mazarakis A; Babis GC; Nikolaou VS; Kaseta MK; Natsis K
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2019 Oct; 41(10):1181-1186. PubMed ID: 31203398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork.
    Huitt TW; Killins A; Brooks WS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24799448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anatomy learning from prosected cadaveric specimens versus three-dimensional software: A comparative study of upper limb anatomy.
    Mitrousias V; Varitimidis SE; Hantes ME; Malizos KN; Arvanitis DL; Zibis AH
    Ann Anat; 2018 Jul; 218():156-164. PubMed ID: 29669259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cadaveric Dissection in Relation to Problem-Based Learning Case Sequencing: A Report of Medical Student Musculoskeletal Examination Performances and Self-Confidence.
    Thompson KL; Gendreau JL; Strickling JE; Young HE
    Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):619-626. PubMed ID: 31069967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Musculoskeletal anatomy: evaluation and comparison of common teaching and learning modalities.
    Zibis A; Mitrousias V; Varitimidis S; Raoulis V; Fyllos A; Arvanitis D
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1517. PubMed ID: 33452299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissection in the Modern Medical Curriculum: An Exploration into Student Perception and Adaptions for the Future.
    Jeyakumar A; Dissanayake B; Dissabandara L
    Anat Sci Educ; 2020 May; 13(3):366-380. PubMed ID: 31168930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online dissection audio-visual resources for human anatomy: Undergraduate medical students' usage and learning outcomes.
    Choi-Lundberg DL; Cuellar WA; Williams AM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):545-554. PubMed ID: 27802370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.