262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36127859)
41. Effect of scaffold architecture on cell seeding efficiency: A discrete phase model CFD analysis.
Ali D
Comput Biol Med; 2019 Jun; 109():62-69. PubMed ID: 31035072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Use of electrospinning and dynamic air focusing to create three-dimensional cell culture scaffolds in microfluidic devices.
Chen C; Mehl BT; Sell SA; Martin RS
Analyst; 2016 Sep; 141(18):5311-20. PubMed ID: 27373715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Surface modification of 3D-printed porous scaffolds via mussel-inspired polydopamine and effective immobilization of rhBMP-2 to promote osteogenic differentiation for bone tissue engineering.
Lee SJ; Lee D; Yoon TR; Kim HK; Jo HH; Park JS; Lee JH; Kim WD; Kwon IK; Park SA
Acta Biomater; 2016 Aug; 40():182-191. PubMed ID: 26868173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Fabrication of three-dimensional porous cell-laden hydrogel for tissue engineering.
Hwang CM; Sant S; Masaeli M; Kachouie NN; Zamanian B; Lee SH; Khademhosseini A
Biofabrication; 2010 Sep; 2(3):035003. PubMed ID: 20823504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Modeling of flow-induced shear stress applied on 3D cellular scaffolds: Implications for vascular tissue engineering.
Lesman A; Blinder Y; Levenberg S
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Feb; 105(3):645-54. PubMed ID: 19787638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional fluid flow in rotating bioreactors for tissue engineering.
Botchwey EA; Pollack SR; Levine EM; Johnston ED; Laurencin CT
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 May; 69(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 15057993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The integration of pore size and porosity distribution on Ti-6A1-4V scaffolds by 3D printing in the modulation of osteo-differentation.
Wo J; Huang SS; Wu DY; Zhu J; Li ZZ; Yuan F
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800020934652. PubMed ID: 32936027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Mechanical properties and cell-culture characteristics of a polycaprolactone kagome-structure scaffold fabricated by a precision extruding deposition system.
Lee SH; Cho YS; Hong MW; Lee BK; Park Y; Park SH; Kim YY; Cho YS
Biomed Mater; 2017 Sep; 12(5):055003. PubMed ID: 28762959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. 3-D computational modeling of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor.
Porter B; Zauel R; Stockman H; Guldberg R; Fyhrie D
J Biomech; 2005 Mar; 38(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 15652553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Fabrication of polylactic acid (PLA)-based porous scaffold through the combination of traditional bio-fabrication and 3D printing technology for bone regeneration.
Zhou X; Zhou G; Junka R; Chang N; Anwar A; Wang H; Yu X
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2021 Jan; 197():111420. PubMed ID: 33113493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Fabrication and in vitro evaluation of 3D printed porous silicate substituted calcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Chen D; Chen G; Zhang X; Chen J; Li J; Kang K; He W; Kong Y; Wu L; Su B; Zhao K; Si D; Wang X
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2022 Nov; 119(11):3297-3310. PubMed ID: 35923072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Screening of perfused combinatorial 3D microenvironments for cell culture.
Lopes D; Fernandes C; Nóbrega JM; Patrício SG; Oliveira MB; Mano JF
Acta Biomater; 2019 Sep; 96():222-236. PubMed ID: 31255663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Dynamic perfusion bioreactor system for 3D culture of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 scaffold in vitro.
Qian X; Yuan F; Zhimin Z; Anchun M
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2013 Aug; 101(6):893-901. PubMed ID: 23362119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Investigation of cell infiltration and colonization in 3D porous scaffolds via integrated experimental and computational strategies.
Xiang Y; Yan J; Bao X; Gleadall A; Sun T
J Biotechnol; 2024 Feb; 382():78-87. PubMed ID: 38307299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Osteoinduction and survival of osteoblasts and bone-marrow stromal cells in 3D biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds under static and dynamic culture conditions.
Rath SN; Strobel LA; Arkudas A; Beier JP; Maier AK; Greil P; Horch RE; Kneser U
J Cell Mol Med; 2012 Oct; 16(10):2350-61. PubMed ID: 22304383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Application of a Parallelizable Perfusion Bioreactor for Physiologic 3D Cell Culture.
Egger D; Spitz S; Fischer M; Handschuh S; Glösmann M; Friemert B; Egerbacher M; Kasper C
Cells Tissues Organs; 2017; 203(5):316-326. PubMed ID: 28291964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Evaluation of perfusion-driven cell seeding of small diameter engineered tissue vascular grafts with a custom-designed seed-and-culture bioreactor.
Saunders SK; Cole SY; Acuna Sierra V; Bracamonte JH; Toldo S; Soares JS
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269499. PubMed ID: 35709083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Multiscale porosity in a 3D printed gellan-gelatin composite for bone tissue engineering.
Gupta D; Vashisth P; Bellare J
Biomed Mater; 2021 Apr; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 33761468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Culture of 3D bioprinted bone constructs requires an increased fluid dynamic stimulation.
Mainardi VL; Rubert M; Sabato C; de Leeuw A; Arrigoni C; Dubini G; Candrian C; Müller R; Moretti M
Acta Biomater; 2022 Nov; 153():374-385. PubMed ID: 36108964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cryogenic 3D printing for producing hierarchical porous and rhBMP-2-loaded Ca-P/PLLA nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Wang C; Zhao Q; Wang M
Biofabrication; 2017 Jun; 9(2):025031. PubMed ID: 28589918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
