135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36129612)
1. Fracture line distribution in femoral head fractures: a complement to Pipkin, Brumback, and AO/OTA classifications.
Wu S; Li R; Wang W; Zhang Y; Mei J
Radiol Med; 2022 Nov; 127(11):1235-1244. PubMed ID: 36129612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Evaluation of Femoral Head Fractures: Which Classification Systems Have the Best Universality, Reliability, and Reproducibility?
Wu S; Qian G; Huang Q; Dou B; Zheng Q; Wang W; Zhu X; Mei J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 482(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 37326487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk Factors for Early Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty After Pipkin IV Femoral Head Fracture.
Cichos KH; White PA; Bergin PF; Ghanem ES; McGwin G; Hawkins J; Spitler CA
J Orthop Trauma; 2023 Apr; 37(4):181-188. PubMed ID: 36730828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Morphological analysis of coronal femoral intertrochanteric fracture and its effect on reduction and internal fixation].
Wei W; Gu Z; Cui J; Zhou Q; Liang Z; Fang G; Wang X; Ji J; Cao L
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 35(9):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 34523272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Femoral fracture classification in the Swedish Fracture Register - a validity study.
Knutsson SB; Wennergren D; Bojan A; Ekelund J; Möller M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May; 20(1):197. PubMed ID: 31068172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Addition of 3D-CT evaluation to radiographic images and effect on diagnostic reliability of current 2018 AO/OTA classification of femoral trochanteric fractures.
Iguchi M; Takahashi T; Matsumura T; Ae R; Hiyama S; Nakashima M; Takeshita K
Injury; 2021 Nov; 52(11):3363-3368. PubMed ID: 34598792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional computed tomography mapping and analysis of distal femur fractures (AO/OTA types 33A, 33B, and 33C).
Li R; Zhuge Y; Zhan Y; Xie X; Luo C
Ann Transl Med; 2022 Apr; 10(7):398. PubMed ID: 35530952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Neer classification to the 2018 update of the Orthopedic Trauma Association/AO fracture classification for classifying proximal humerus fractures.
Marmor MT; Agel J; Dumpe J; Kellam JF; Marecek GS; Meinberg E; Nguyen MP; Sims S; Soles GL; Karam MD
OTA Int; 2022 Sep; 5(3):e200. PubMed ID: 36425090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The pivotal role of the coronal fracture line for a new three-dimensional CT-based fracture classification of bicondylar proximal tibial fractures.
Pätzold R; Friederichs J; von Rüden C; Panzer S; Bühren V; Augat P
Injury; 2017 Oct; 48(10):2214-2220. PubMed ID: 28711171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
Marongiu G; Leinardi L; Congia S; Frigau L; Mola F; Capone A
J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the new AO/OTA classification of proximal femur fractures.
Chan G; Hughes K; Barakat A; Edres K; da Assuncao R; Page P; Dawe E
Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1434-1437. PubMed ID: 33097201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional fracture mapping and analysis of coronal fractures in AO/OTA types 33-B3 and C3.
Ding Y; Wang D; Waheed MZ; Zhou JL
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Oct; 17(1):438. PubMed ID: 36183139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High reliability in classification of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register.
Wennergren D; Ekholm C; Sundfeldt M; Karlsson J; Bhandari M; Möller M
Injury; 2016 Feb; 47(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 26620119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional printing models increase inter-rater agreement for classification and treatment of proximal humerus fractures.
Cocco LF; Aihara AY; Lopes FPPL; Werner H; Franciozi CE; Dos Reis FB; Luzo MVM
Patient Saf Surg; 2022 Jan; 16(1):5. PubMed ID: 35057844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture morphology of AO/OTA 31-A trochanteric fractures: A 3D CT study with an emphasis on coronal fragments.
Cho JW; Kent WT; Yoon YC; Kim Y; Kim H; Jha A; Durai SK; Oh JK
Injury; 2017 Feb; 48(2):277-284. PubMed ID: 28040260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional computed tomography mapping techniques in the morphometric analysis of AO/OTA 33A and 33C distal femoral fractures: a retrospective single-center study.
Chen S; Zheng Z; Guo J; Hong S; Zhou W; Xie J; Wang W
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1162214. PubMed ID: 37397967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction improves the reliability of tibial pilon fracture classification and preoperative surgical planning.
Keiler A; Riechelmann F; Thöni M; Brunner A; Ulmar B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Feb; 140(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 31529150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the 2018 AO/OTA classification for high-energy pelvic ring injuries: A retrospective study.
Ansorge A; de Foy M; Poncet A; Gamulin A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Oct; 107(6):102999. PubMed ID: 34216840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Classification of femur trochanteric fracture: Evaluating the reliability of Tang classification.
Yin B; He Y; Wang D; Zhou J
Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 33280893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fractured morphology of femoral head associated with subsequent femoral neck fracture: Injury analyses of 2D and 3D models of femoral head fractures with computed tomography.
Wu S; Wang W; Li R; Guo J; Miao Y; Li G; Mei J
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1115639. PubMed ID: 36733965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
