These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36130875)

  • 61. A review of climate-change adaptation strategies for wildlife management and biodiversity conservation.
    Mawdsley JR; O'Malley R; Ojima DS
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Oct; 23(5):1080-9. PubMed ID: 19549219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Understanding conflicting cultural models of outdoor cats to overcome conservation impasse.
    Leong KM; Gramza AR; Lepczyk CA
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Oct; 34(5):1190-1199. PubMed ID: 32374059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The place of nature in conservation conflicts.
    Chapron G; López-Bao JV
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Aug; 34(4):795-802. PubMed ID: 32406544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Towards equitable conservation: Social capital, fear and livestock loss shape perceived benefit from a protected area.
    Parker BG; Jacobsen KS; Vucetich JA; Dickman AJ; Loveridge AJ; Macdonald DW
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 319():115676. PubMed ID: 35839648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Governing trade-offs in ecosystem services and disservices to achieve human-wildlife coexistence.
    Ceauşu S; Graves RA; Killion AK; Svenning JC; Carter NH
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Jun; 33(3):543-553. PubMed ID: 30350889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Addressing inequality and intolerance in human-wildlife coexistence.
    Jordan NR; Smith BP; Appleby RG; van Eeden LM; Webster HS
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Aug; 34(4):803-810. PubMed ID: 32406972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Position of the American Dietetic Association: dietetics professionals can implement practices to conserve natural resources and protect the environment. (Previously titled "natural resource conservation and waste management").
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2001 Oct; 101(10):1221-7. PubMed ID: 11678498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Chicago wilderness: a new force in urban conservation.
    Moskovits DK; Fialkowski C; Mueller GM; Sullivan TA; Rogner J; McCance E
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Jun; 1023():215-36. PubMed ID: 15253908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Conservation reaches new heights.
    Pepall J; Khanal P
    IDRC Rep; 1992 Oct; 20(3):22-4. PubMed ID: 12285834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Conservation metagenomics: a new branch of conservation biology.
    Wei F; Wu Q; Hu Y; Huang G; Nie Y; Yan L
    Sci China Life Sci; 2019 Feb; 62(2):168-178. PubMed ID: 30588567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Research Priorities from Animal Behaviour for Maximising Conservation Progress.
    Greggor AL; Berger-Tal O; Blumstein DT; Angeloni L; Bessa-Gomes C; Blackwell BF; St Clair CC; Crooks K; de Silva S; Fernández-Juricic E; Goldenberg SZ; Mesnick SL; Owen M; Price CJ; Saltz D; Schell CJ; Suarez AV; Swaisgood RR; Winchell CS; Sutherland WJ
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2016 Dec; 31(12):953-964. PubMed ID: 27692480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Arctic wilderness policy in the United States and Finland.
    Gladden JN
    Environ Manage; 2001 Mar; 27(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 11148763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Exploring nationality and social identity to explain attitudes toward conservation actions in the United States and Australia.
    van Eeden LM; Slagle K; Newsome TM; Crowther MS; Dickman CR; Bruskotter JT
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Oct; 34(5):1165-1175. PubMed ID: 32090380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Ecology and conservation: contributions to One Health.
    Cleaveland S; Borner M; Gislason M
    Rev Sci Tech; 2014 Aug; 33(2):615-27. PubMed ID: 25707188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Improving our legacy: incorporation of adaptive management into state wildlife action plans.
    Fontaine JJ
    J Environ Manage; 2011 May; 92(5):1403-8. PubMed ID: 20971548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A coupled forage-grazer model predicts viability of livestock production and wildlife habitat at the regional scale.
    Kowal VA; Jones SM; Keesing F; Allan BF; Schieltz JM; Chaplin-Kramer R
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):19957. PubMed ID: 31889071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Potential for cascading impacts of environmental change and policy on indigenous culture.
    Yletyinen J; Tylianakis JM; Stone C; Lyver PO
    Ambio; 2022 May; 51(5):1110-1122. PubMed ID: 35034329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Generating co-management at Kasha Katuwe Tent Rocks National Monument, New Mexico.
    Pinel SL; Pecos J
    Environ Manage; 2012 Mar; 49(3):593-604. PubMed ID: 22362001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Use of EPA collaborative problem-solving model to obtain environmental justice in North Carolina.
    Wilson SM; Wilson OR; Heaney CD; Cooper J
    Prog Community Health Partnersh; 2007; 1(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 20208212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.