133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36131197)
1. Using Mokken scaling techniques to explore carelessness in survey research.
Wind S; Wang Y
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; 55(7):3370-3415. PubMed ID: 36131197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A sequential Moken scaling approach to evaluate response quality in survey research.
Wind SA; Lugu B; Wang Y
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2273-2291. PubMed ID: 37311866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identifying Problematic Item Characteristics With Small Samples Using Mokken Scale Analysis.
Wind SA
Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Aug; 82(4):747-756. PubMed ID: 35754613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A tutorial on how to do a Mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data.
Sijtsma K; van der Ark LA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):137-158. PubMed ID: 27958642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating psychometric properties and dimensional structure of an educational environment measure (DREEM) using Mokken scale analysis - a pragmatic approach.
Palmgren PJ; Brodin U; Nilsson GH; Watson R; Stenfors T
BMC Med Educ; 2018 Oct; 18(1):235. PubMed ID: 30305143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing Person-Fit and Traditional Indices Across Careless Response Patterns in Surveys.
Jones EA; Wind SA; Tsai CL; Ge Y
Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Sep; 47(5-6):365-385. PubMed ID: 37810542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mokken scale analysis of mental health and well-being questionnaire item responses: a non-parametric IRT method in empirical research for applied health researchers.
Stochl J; Jones PB; Croudace TJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jun; 12():74. PubMed ID: 22686586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using a nonparametric item response theory model to identify patterns of cognitive decline: The Mokken scale analysis.
Calderón C; Palominos D; Véliz-García Ó; Ramos-Henderson M; Bekios-Canales N; Beyle C; Ávalos-Tejeda M; Domic-Siede M
J Neuropsychol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38934236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring Within-Rater Category Ordering: A Simulation Study Using Adjacent-Categories Mokken Scale Analysis.
Wind SA; Schumacker RE
Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Oct; 78(5):887-904. PubMed ID: 32655174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examining the Psychometric Quality of Multiple-Choice Assessment Items using Mokken Scale Analysis.
Wind SA
J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(2):142-165. PubMed ID: 28009581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring Rating Quality in Rater-Mediated Assessments Using Mokken Scale Analysis.
Wind SA; Engelhard G
Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Aug; 76(4):685-706. PubMed ID: 29795883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A two-step, test-guided Mokken scale analysis, for nonclustered and clustered data.
Koopman L; Zijlstra BJH; van der Ark LA
Qual Life Res; 2022 Jan; 31(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 33983619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Properties of a Transport Instrument for Measuring Psychological Impacts of Delay on Commuters, Mokken Scale Analysis.
Rezapour M; Veenstra C; Cuccolo K; Ferraro FR
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():748899. PubMed ID: 34970187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Non-Parametric Item Response Theory Evaluation of the CAGE Instrument Among Older Adults.
Abdin E; Sagayadevan V; Vaingankar JA; Picco L; Chong SA; Subramaniam M
Subst Use Misuse; 2018 Feb; 53(3):391-399. PubMed ID: 28777686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The robust estimation of examinee ability based on the four-parameter logistic model when guessing and carelessness responses exist.
Jian X; Buyun D; Yuanping D
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250268. PubMed ID: 33914784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robust maximum marginal likelihood (RMML) estimation for item response theory models.
Hong MR; Cheng Y
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):573-588. PubMed ID: 30350024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of careless responding on the fit of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory models.
Voss NM
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; 56(2):577-599. PubMed ID: 36737580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Crit coefficient in Mokken scale analysis: a simulation study and an application in quality-of-life research.
Crișan DR; Tendeiro JN; Meijer RR
Qual Life Res; 2022 Jan; 31(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 34476671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effectiveness of warning statements in reducing careless responding in crowdsourced online surveys.
Brühlmann F; Memeti Z; Aeschbach LF; Perrig SAC; Opwis K
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38238528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel nonparametric item response theory approach to measuring socioeconomic position: a comparison using household expenditure data from a Vietnam health survey, 2003.
Reidpath DD; Ahmadi K
Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2014; 11():9. PubMed ID: 25126103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
