These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36131197)

  • 1. Using Mokken scaling techniques to explore carelessness in survey research.
    Wind S; Wang Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; 55(7):3370-3415. PubMed ID: 36131197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A sequential Moken scaling approach to evaluate response quality in survey research.
    Wind SA; Lugu B; Wang Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2273-2291. PubMed ID: 37311866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying Problematic Item Characteristics With Small Samples Using Mokken Scale Analysis.
    Wind SA
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Aug; 82(4):747-756. PubMed ID: 35754613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A tutorial on how to do a Mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data.
    Sijtsma K; van der Ark LA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):137-158. PubMed ID: 27958642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating psychometric properties and dimensional structure of an educational environment measure (DREEM) using Mokken scale analysis - a pragmatic approach.
    Palmgren PJ; Brodin U; Nilsson GH; Watson R; Stenfors T
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Oct; 18(1):235. PubMed ID: 30305143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing Person-Fit and Traditional Indices Across Careless Response Patterns in Surveys.
    Jones EA; Wind SA; Tsai CL; Ge Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Sep; 47(5-6):365-385. PubMed ID: 37810542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mokken scale analysis of mental health and well-being questionnaire item responses: a non-parametric IRT method in empirical research for applied health researchers.
    Stochl J; Jones PB; Croudace TJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jun; 12():74. PubMed ID: 22686586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using a nonparametric item response theory model to identify patterns of cognitive decline: The Mokken scale analysis.
    Calderón C; Palominos D; Véliz-García Ó; Ramos-Henderson M; Bekios-Canales N; Beyle C; Ávalos-Tejeda M; Domic-Siede M
    J Neuropsychol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38934236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring Within-Rater Category Ordering: A Simulation Study Using Adjacent-Categories Mokken Scale Analysis.
    Wind SA; Schumacker RE
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Oct; 78(5):887-904. PubMed ID: 32655174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining the Psychometric Quality of Multiple-Choice Assessment Items using Mokken Scale Analysis.
    Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(2):142-165. PubMed ID: 28009581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring Rating Quality in Rater-Mediated Assessments Using Mokken Scale Analysis.
    Wind SA; Engelhard G
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Aug; 76(4):685-706. PubMed ID: 29795883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A two-step, test-guided Mokken scale analysis, for nonclustered and clustered data.
    Koopman L; Zijlstra BJH; van der Ark LA
    Qual Life Res; 2022 Jan; 31(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 33983619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Properties of a Transport Instrument for Measuring Psychological Impacts of Delay on Commuters, Mokken Scale Analysis.
    Rezapour M; Veenstra C; Cuccolo K; Ferraro FR
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():748899. PubMed ID: 34970187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Non-Parametric Item Response Theory Evaluation of the CAGE Instrument Among Older Adults.
    Abdin E; Sagayadevan V; Vaingankar JA; Picco L; Chong SA; Subramaniam M
    Subst Use Misuse; 2018 Feb; 53(3):391-399. PubMed ID: 28777686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The robust estimation of examinee ability based on the four-parameter logistic model when guessing and carelessness responses exist.
    Jian X; Buyun D; Yuanping D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250268. PubMed ID: 33914784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust maximum marginal likelihood (RMML) estimation for item response theory models.
    Hong MR; Cheng Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):573-588. PubMed ID: 30350024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of warning statements in reducing careless responding in crowdsourced online surveys.
    Brühlmann F; Memeti Z; Aeschbach LF; Perrig SAC; Opwis K
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Sep; 56(6):5862-5875. PubMed ID: 38238528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Crit coefficient in Mokken scale analysis: a simulation study and an application in quality-of-life research.
    Crișan DR; Tendeiro JN; Meijer RR
    Qual Life Res; 2022 Jan; 31(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 34476671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of careless responding on the fit of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory models.
    Voss NM
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; 56(2):577-599. PubMed ID: 36737580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel nonparametric item response theory approach to measuring socioeconomic position: a comparison using household expenditure data from a Vietnam health survey, 2003.
    Reidpath DD; Ahmadi K
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2014; 11():9. PubMed ID: 25126103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.