These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36133149)

  • 1. Defence mitigation by predators of chemically defended prey integrated over the predation sequence and across biological levels with a focus on cardiotonic steroids.
    Mohammadi S; Yang L; Bulbert M; Rowland HM
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Sep; 9(9):220363. PubMed ID: 36133149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The evolution and ecology of multiple antipredator defences.
    Kikuchi DW; Allen WL; Arbuckle K; Aubier TG; Briolat ES; Burdfield-Steel ER; Cheney KL; Daňková K; Elias M; Hämäläinen L; Herberstein ME; Hossie TJ; Joron M; Kunte K; Leavell BC; Lindstedt C; Lorioux-Chevalier U; McClure M; McLellan CF; Medina I; Nawge V; Páez E; Pal A; Pekár S; Penacchio O; Raška J; Reader T; Rojas B; Rönkä KH; Rößler DC; Rowe C; Rowland HM; Roy A; Schaal KA; Sherratt TN; Skelhorn J; Smart HR; Stankowich T; Stefan AM; Summers K; Taylor CH; Thorogood R; Umbers K; Winters AE; Yeager J; Exnerová A
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jul; 36(7):975-991. PubMed ID: 37363877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prey defence phenotype mediates multiple-predator effects in tri-trophic food webs.
    Guariento RD; Dalponti G; Carneiro LS; Caliman A
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Oct; 91(10):2023-2036. PubMed ID: 35839141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Density-dependent effects of prey defences.
    Jeschke JM; Tollrian R
    Oecologia; 2000 May; 123(3):391-396. PubMed ID: 28308594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics.
    Halpin CG; Skelhorn J; Rowe C; Ruxton GD; Higginson AD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169043. PubMed ID: 28045959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fire as a driver and mediator of predator-prey interactions.
    Doherty TS; Geary WL; Jolly CJ; Macdonald KJ; Miritis V; Watchorn DJ; Cherry MJ; Conner LM; González TM; Legge SM; Ritchie EG; Stawski C; Dickman CR
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2022 Aug; 97(4):1539-1558. PubMed ID: 35320881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Camouflage in predators.
    Pembury Smith MQR; Ruxton GD
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2020 Oct; 95(5):1325-1340. PubMed ID: 32410297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numbers, neighbors, and hungry predators: What makes chemically defended aposematic prey susceptible to predation?
    Kaczmarek JM; Kaczmarski M; Mazurkiewicz J; Kloskowski J
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 10(24):13705-13716. PubMed ID: 33391674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Behavioural Responses of Defended and Undefended Prey to Their Predator-A Case Study of Rotifera.
    Parry V; Schlägel UE; Tiedemann R; Weithoff G
    Biology (Basel); 2022 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 36009844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating Müllerian mimicry: predator learning and variation in prey defences.
    Ihalainen E; Lindström L; Mappes J
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 20(2):780-91. PubMed ID: 17305843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finding a signal hidden among noise: how can predators overcome camouflage strategies?
    Galloway JAM; Green SD; Stevens M; Kelley LA
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Jul; 375(1802):20190478. PubMed ID: 32420842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disentangling taste and toxicity in aposematic prey.
    Holen ØH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Feb; 280(1753):20122588. PubMed ID: 23256198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reciprocity in predator-prey interactions: exposure to defended prey and predation risk affects intermediate predator life history and morphology.
    Hammill E; Beckerman AP
    Oecologia; 2010 May; 163(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 19936795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A field demonstration of the costs and benefits of group living to edible and defended prey.
    Curley EA; Rowley HE; Speed MP
    Biol Lett; 2015 Jun; 11(6):20150152. PubMed ID: 26085497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A theory for investment across defences triggered at different stages of a predator-prey encounter.
    Wang L; Ruxton GD; Cornell SJ; Speed MP; Broom M
    J Theor Biol; 2019 Jul; 473():9-19. PubMed ID: 31004613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Plant resistance reduces the strength of consumptive and non-consumptive effects of predators on aphids.
    Kersch-Becker MF; Thaler JS
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Sep; 84(5):1222-32. PubMed ID: 25788108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights.
    Puurtinen M; Kaitala V
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ADAPTIVE RESPONSES OF PREDATORS TO PREY AND PREY TO PREDATORS: THE FAILURE OF THE ARMS-RACE ANALOGY.
    Abrams PA
    Evolution; 1986 Nov; 40(6):1229-1247. PubMed ID: 28563514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Defence versus defence: Are crucian carp trading off immune function against predator-induced morphology?
    Vinterstare J; Hegemann A; Nilsson PA; Hulthén K; Brönmark C
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Oct; 88(10):1510-1521. PubMed ID: 31286512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why aren't warning signals everywhere? On the prevalence of aposematism and mimicry in communities.
    Kikuchi DW; Herberstein ME; Barfield M; Holt RD; Mappes J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2021 Dec; 96(6):2446-2460. PubMed ID: 34128583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.