120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36134435)
21. Initial outcomes of local anaesthetic freehand transperineal prostate biopsies in the outpatient setting.
Kum F; Elhage O; Maliyil J; Wong K; Faure Walker N; Kulkarni M; Namdarian B; Challacombe B; Cathcart P; Popert R
BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):244-252. PubMed ID: 30431694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prostate cancer diagnostic pathway: Is a one-stop cognitive MRI targeted biopsy service a realistic goal in everyday practice? A pilot cohort in a tertiary referral centre in the UK.
Bass EJ; Freeman A; Jameson C; Punwani S; Moore CM; Arya M; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e024941. PubMed ID: 30361408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy.
Vėželis A; Platkevičius G; Kinčius M; Gumbys L; Naruševičiūtė I; Briedienė R; Petroška D; Ulys A; Jankevičius F
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jan; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33435132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Ultrasonography: The IP1-PROSTAGRAM Study.
Eldred-Evans D; Burak P; Connor MJ; Day E; Evans M; Fiorentino F; Gammon M; Hosking-Jervis F; Klimowska-Nassar N; McGuire W; Padhani AR; Prevost AT; Price D; Sokhi H; Tam H; Winkler M; Ahmed HU
JAMA Oncol; 2021 Mar; 7(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 33570542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Transperineal freehand multiparametric MRI fusion targeted biopsies under local anaesthesia for prostate cancer diagnosis: a multicentre prospective study of 1014 cases.
Marra G; Zhuang J; Beltrami M; Calleris G; Zhao X; Marquis A; Kan Y; Oderda M; Huang H; Faletti R; Zhang Q; Molinaro L; Wang W; Bergamasco L; Guo H; Gontero P
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):122-130. PubMed ID: 32455504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection.
Wajswol E; Winoker JS; Anastos H; Falagario U; Okhawere K; Martini A; Treacy PJ; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):531-540. PubMed ID: 31762182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided transperineal target biopsy with needle tracking with a mechanical position-encoded stepper in detecting significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men.
Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Ogawa T; Kawakami M; Nakano M; Hashida K; Sato Y; Hasebe T; Uchida T; Tajiri T
Int J Urol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 28222486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Kasivisvanathan V; Dufour R; Moore CM; Ahmed HU; Abd-Alazeez M; Charman SC; Freeman A; Allen C; Kirkham A; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):860-6. PubMed ID: 23063807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.
Hoeks CM; Schouten MG; Bomers JG; Hoogendoorn SP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Hambrock T; Vergunst H; Sedelaar JP; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2012 Nov; 62(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 22325447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimising the number of cores for magnetic resonance imaging-guided targeted and systematic transperineal prostate biopsy.
Hansen NL; Barrett T; Lloyd T; Warren A; Samel C; Bratt O; Kastner C
BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):260-269. PubMed ID: 31306539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Defining the learning curve for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate using MRI-transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsies as a validation tool.
Gaziev G; Wadhwa K; Barrett T; Koo BC; Gallagher FA; Serrao E; Frey J; Seidenader J; Carmona L; Warren A; Gnanapragasam V; Doble A; Kastner C
BJU Int; 2016 Jan; 117(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 25099182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High cancer detection rate using cognitive fusion - targeted transperineal prostate biopsies.
Dekalo S; Matzkin H; Mabjeesh NJ
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(4):600-606. PubMed ID: 28783264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of Targeted vs Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men Who Are Biopsy Naive: The Prospective Assessment of Image Registration in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PAIREDCAP) Study.
Elkhoury FF; Felker ER; Kwan L; Sisk AE; Delfin M; Natarajan S; Marks LS
JAMA Surg; 2019 Sep; 154(9):811-818. PubMed ID: 31188412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A systematic review on the outcomes of local anaesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy.
Kanagarajah A; Hogan D; Yao HH; Dundee P; O'Connell HE
BJU Int; 2023 Apr; 131(4):408-423. PubMed ID: 36177521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study.
Rakauskas A; Peters M; Martel P; van Rossum PSN; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Roth B; Valerio M
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280262. PubMed ID: 36652429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study.
Rouvière O; Puech P; Renard-Penna R; Claudon M; Roy C; Mège-Lechevallier F; Decaussin-Petrucci M; Dubreuil-Chambardel M; Magaud L; Remontet L; Ruffion A; Colombel M; Crouzet S; Schott AM; Lemaitre L; Rabilloud M; Grenier N;
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jan; 20(1):100-109. PubMed ID: 30470502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transperineal biopsy prostate cancer detection in first biopsy and repeat biopsy after negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: the Victorian Transperineal Biopsy Collaboration experience.
Ong WL; Weerakoon M; Huang S; Paul E; Lawrentschuk N; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Murphy D; Grummet J
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116(4):568-76. PubMed ID: 25560926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical utility of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy of the prostate after negative magnetic resonance imaging-guided transrectal biopsy.
Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Ahmed HU; Barret E; Cathala N; Mombet A; Uriburu Pizarro F; Carneiro A; Doizi S; Galiano M; Rozet F; Prapotnich D; Cathelineau X
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):329.e7-11. PubMed ID: 25957713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
