BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36135071)

  • 1. The Diagnostic Value of PI-RADS v2.1 in Patients with a History of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP).
    Liu J; Pan S; Dong L; Wu G; Wang J; Wang Y; Qian H; Dong B; Pan J; Zhu Y; Xue W
    Curr Oncol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):6373-6382. PubMed ID: 36135071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?
    Polanec SH; Bickel H; Wengert GJ; Arnoldner M; Clauser P; Susani M; Shariat SF; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
    Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e1-157.e7. PubMed ID: 31690449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The diagnostic value of version 2.1 prostate imaging reporting and data system for prostate transitional zone lesions].
    Yang S; Zhang CY; Zhang YY; Tan SX; Wei CG; Shen XH; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Dec; 100(45):3609-3613. PubMed ID: 33333685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cutoff Values of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 Score in Men With Prostate-specific Antigen Level 4 to 10 ng/mL: Importance of Lesion Location.
    Chen Y; Ruan M; Zhou B; Hu X; Wang H; Liu H; Liu J; Song G
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2021 Aug; 19(4):288-295. PubMed ID: 33632569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic value of combining PI-RADS v2.1 with PSAD in clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Wei X; Xu J; Zhong S; Zou J; Cheng Z; Ding Z; Zhou X
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Oct; 47(10):3574-3582. PubMed ID: 35788882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RIDS v2) to detect prostate cancer can prevent unnecessary biopsies and invasive treatment.
    Liu C; Liu SL; Wang ZX; Yu K; Feng CX; Ke Z; Wang L; Zeng XY
    Asian J Androl; 2018; 20(5):459-464. PubMed ID: 29667616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
    Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
    Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of a nomogram combining multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and PSA-related parameters to enhance the detection of clinically significant cancer across different region.
    Zhou Z; Liang Z; Zuo Y; Zhou Y; Yan W; Wu X; Ji Z; Li H; Hu M; Ma L
    Prostate; 2022 Apr; 82(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 35098557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.
    Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Chen T; Yu HC; Dai GC; Tu J; Yang S; Zhao WL; Shen JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 32755220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structured approach to resolving discordance between PI-RADS v2.1 score and targeted prostate biopsy results: an opportunity for quality improvement.
    Arcot R; Sekar S; Kotamarti S; Krischak M; Michael ZD; Foo WC; Huang J; Polascik TJ; Gupta RT
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Aug; 47(8):2917-2927. PubMed ID: 35674785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The potential of a nomogram combined PI-RADS v2.1 and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to reduce unnecessary biopsies in prostate cancer diagnostics.
    Liu Y; Wang S; Xiang LH; Xu G; Dong L; Sun Y; Ye B; Zhang Y; Xu H
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 95(1138):20220209. PubMed ID: 35877385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
    Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Based on PI-RADS v2.1 combining PHI and ADC values to guide prostate biopsy in patients with PSA 4-20 ng/mL.
    Huang H; Liu Z; Ma Y; Shao Y; Yang Z; Duan D; Zhao Y; Wen S; Tian J; Liu Y; Wang Z; Yue D; Wang Y
    Prostate; 2024 Mar; 84(4):376-388. PubMed ID: 38116741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.
    Tamada T; Kido A; Takeuchi M; Yamamoto A; Miyaji Y; Kanomata N; Sone T
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108704. PubMed ID: 31669798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients.
    Washino S; Okochi T; Saito K; Konishi T; Hirai M; Kobayashi Y; Miyagawa T
    BJU Int; 2017 Feb; 119(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 26935594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and external validation of a novel nomogram to predict prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients with PSA <10 ng/ml and PI-RADS v2.1 = 3 lesions.
    Hu C; Sun J; Xu Z; Zhang Z; Zhou Q; Xu J; Chen H; Wang C; Ouyang J
    Cancer Med; 2023 Feb; 12(3):2560-2571. PubMed ID: 35920264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.
    Taghipour M; Ziaei A; Alessandrino F; Hassanzadeh E; Harisinghani M; Vangel M; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Apr; 44(4):1520-1527. PubMed ID: 30361870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effects of dynamic contrast enhancement on diffusion weighted imaging score of 3 in prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 of peripheral zone].
    Wang W; Shao ZH; Huang XH; Xu Y; Feng X; Wang PJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 100(13):1002-1006. PubMed ID: 32294857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?
    Xu N; Wu YP; Chen DN; Ke ZB; Cai H; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Huang JB; Li XD; Xue XY
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 May; 144(5):987-995. PubMed ID: 29504080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.