BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36135071)

  • 21. [Effects of dynamic contrast enhancement on diffusion weighted imaging score of 3 in prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 of peripheral zone].
    Wang W; Shao ZH; Huang XH; Xu Y; Feng X; Wang PJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 100(13):1002-1006. PubMed ID: 32294857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?
    Xu N; Wu YP; Chen DN; Ke ZB; Cai H; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Huang JB; Li XD; Xue XY
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 May; 144(5):987-995. PubMed ID: 29504080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation Was Used in Conjunction with Prostate PI-RADS v2.1 Score Has Diagnostic Relevance for Benign and Malignant Prostate Lesions.
    Xu W; Cao H; Du F; He L; Jiang F; Hu C
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():3613540. PubMed ID: 36072774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Combining clinical and MRI data to manage PI-RADS 3 lesions and reduce excessive biopsy.
    Yang S; Zhao W; Tan S; Zhang Y; Wei C; Chen T; Shen J
    Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Jun; 9(3):1252-1261. PubMed ID: 32676408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Developing a predictive model for clinically significant prostate cancer by combining age, PSA density, and mpMRI.
    Ma Z; Wang X; Zhang W; Gao K; Wang L; Qian L; Mu J; Zheng Z; Cao X
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Mar; 21(1):83. PubMed ID: 36882854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer: novel scoring systems.
    Chen T; Wang F; Chen H; Wang M; Liu P; Liu S; Zhou Y; Ma Q
    BMC Urol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):64. PubMed ID: 35439952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The clinical decision-making value of prostate specific antigen and its derived indicators in prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 3 lesions].
    Yang S; Zhang YY; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Chen T; Li MJ; Tan SX; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 100(13):997-1001. PubMed ID: 32294856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
    Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving the detection rate of prostate cancer in the gray zone of PI-RADS v2 and serum tPSA by using prostate-specific antigen-age volume.
    Lu YF; Zhang Q; Chen HY; Chen JY; Pan Y; Xu CC; Xu JX; Yu RS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(26):e16289. PubMed ID: 31261602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 1 and version 2 and combination with apparent diffusion coefficient as a predictor of biopsy outcome.
    Ryznarová Z; Keller J; Záleský M; Zachoval R; Čapek V; Malikova H
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2019 Mar; 40(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 31184822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of relationships between the final Gleason score, PI-RADS v2 score, ADC value, PSA level, and tumor diameter in patients that underwent radical prostatectomy due to prostate cancer.
    Gündoğdu E; Emekli E; Kebapçı M
    Radiol Med; 2020 Sep; 125(9):827-837. PubMed ID: 32266690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Role of PSA Density among PI-RADS v2.1 Categories to Avoid an Unnecessary Transition Zone Biopsy in Patients with PSA 4-20 ng/mL.
    Wang ZB; Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Dai GC; Tu J; Shen JK
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():3995789. PubMed ID: 34671673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.
    Thaiss WM; Moser S; Hepp T; Kruck S; Rausch S; Scharpf M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kaufmann S
    World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35922717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.
    Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Carrion I; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):683-690. PubMed ID: 32755208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiomics from multisite MRI and clinical data to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Krauss W; Frey J; Heydorn Lagerlöf J; Lidén M; Thunberg P
    Acta Radiol; 2024 Mar; 65(3):307-317. PubMed ID: 38115809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Direct Comparison of PI-RADS Version 2 and 2.1 in Transition Zone Lesions for Detection of Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Experience.
    Byun J; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):577-586. PubMed ID: 32045072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Prospective Accuracy Study of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Whole-mount Pathology.
    Giannarini G; Girometti R; Crestani A; Rossanese M; Calandriello M; Cereser L; Bednarova S; Battistella C; Sioletic S; Zuiani C; Valotto C; Ficarra V
    Urology; 2019 Jan; 123():191-197. PubMed ID: 30273613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mazzone E; Stabile A; Pellegrino F; Basile G; Cignoli D; Cirulli GO; Sorce G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Cucchiara V; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):697-713. PubMed ID: 33358543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v1.
    Polanec S; Helbich TH; Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Georg D; Shariat SF; Aulitzky W; Susani M; Baltzer PA
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27161062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prostate biopsy in the era of MRI-targeting: towards a judicious use of additional systematic biopsy.
    Deniffel D; Perlis N; Ghai S; Girgis S; Healy GM; Fleshner N; Hamilton R; Kulkarni G; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Haider MA
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7544-7554. PubMed ID: 35507051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.