153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36135907)
1. Behavior of Mebendazole during NF/RO Adsorption and Photolysis.
Babić B; Andrić D; Farkaš A; Vuk D; Ašperger D; Dolar D
Membranes (Basel); 2022 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 36135907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Removal of antibiotics and estrogens by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Yang L; Xia C; Jiang J; Chen X; Zhou Y; Yuan C; Bai L; Meng S; Cao G
J Hazard Mater; 2024 Jan; 461():132628. PubMed ID: 37783143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of water matrices on removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Dolar D; Vuković A; Asperger D; Kosutić K
J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(8):1299-307. PubMed ID: 22128537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of feed solution characteristics and membrane fouling on the removal of THMs by UF/NF/RO membranes.
Fang C; Ou T; Wang X; Rui M; Chu W
Chemosphere; 2020 Dec; 260():127625. PubMed ID: 32758776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of silica fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Lin YL; Chiou JH; Lee CH
J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul; 277():102-9. PubMed ID: 24560524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of different nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for simultaneous removal of arsenic and boron from spent geothermal water.
Jarma YA; Karaoğlu A; Tekin Ö; Baba A; Ökten HE; Tomaszewska B; Bostancı K; Arda M; Kabay N
J Hazard Mater; 2021 Mar; 405():124129. PubMed ID: 33082019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An investigation of desalination by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and integrated (hybrid NF/RO) membranes employed in brackish water treatment.
Talaeipour M; Nouri J; Hassani AH; Mahvi AH
J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2017; 15():18. PubMed ID: 28736617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the treatment of reverse osmosis concentrates from municipal wastewater reclamation by coagulation and granular activated carbon adsorption.
Sun YX; Yang Z; Ye T; Shi N; Tian Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Jul; 23(13):13543-53. PubMed ID: 27032632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficiency of RO/NF membranes at the removal of veterinary antibiotics.
Dolar D; Vuković A; Ašperger D; Košutić K
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 22233911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Removal, Adsorption, and Cleaning of Pharmaceutical on Polyamide RO and NF Membranes.
Dolar D; Ćurić I; Ašperger D
Polymers (Basel); 2023 Jun; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 37376394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment.
Luo Y; Guo W; Ngo HH; Nghiem LD; Hai FI; Zhang J; Liang S; Wang XC
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 473-474():619-41. PubMed ID: 24394371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Organics removal and in-situ granule activated carbon regeneration in FBR-Fenton/GAC process for reverse osmosis concentrate treatment.
Cai QQ; Wu MY; Hu LM; Lee BCY; Ong SL; Wang P; Hu JY
Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116119. PubMed ID: 32663698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Removal of haloacetic acids from swimming pool water by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration.
Yang L; She Q; Wan MP; Wang R; Chang VW; Tang CY
Water Res; 2017 Jun; 116():116-125. PubMed ID: 28324708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Challenges of municipal wastewater reclamation for irrigation by MBR and NF/RO: Physico-chemical and microbiological parameters, and emerging contaminants.
Racar M; Dolar D; Karadakić K; Čavarović N; Glumac N; Ašperger D; Košutić K
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 722():137959. PubMed ID: 32208282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Removal of dissolved organic matter by granular-activated carbon adsorption as a pretreatment to reverse osmosis of membrane bioreactor effluents.
Gur-Reznik S; Katz I; Dosoretz CG
Water Res; 2008 Mar; 42(6-7):1595-605. PubMed ID: 17980400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential of nanofiltration and low pressure reverse osmosis in the removal of phosphorus for aquaculture.
Leo CP; Yahya MZ; Kamal SN; Ahmad AL; Mohammad AW
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(4):831-7. PubMed ID: 23306262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Photocatalytic degradation of carbofuran by TiO2-coated activated carbon: Model for kinetic, electrical energy per order and economic analysis.
Vishnuganth MA; Remya N; Kumar M; Selvaraju N
J Environ Manage; 2016 Oct; 181():201-207. PubMed ID: 27353370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between nitrate and pesticide removal from ground water using adsorbents and NF and RO membranes.
Tepus B; Simonic M; Petrinić I
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct; 170(2-3):1210-7. PubMed ID: 19541416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adsorption of pharmaceuticals onto isolated polyamide active layer of NF/RO membranes.
Liu YL; Wang XM; Yang HW; Xie YF
Chemosphere; 2018 Jun; 200():36-47. PubMed ID: 29471167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
