BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36136885)

  • 1. Effect of Different Anthropometric Body Indexes on Radiation Exposure in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterisation and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Koh Y; Vogrin S; Noaman S; Lam S; Pham R; Clark A; Biffin L; Hanson LB; Bloom JE; Stub D; Brennan AL; Reid C; Dinh DT; Lefkovits J; Cox N; Chan W
    Tomography; 2022 Sep; 8(5):2256-2267. PubMed ID: 36136885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anthropometric parameters and radiation doses during percutaneous coronary procedures.
    Manicardi M; Nocetti L; Brigidi A; Cadioli C; Sgreccia D; Valenti AC; Vitolo M; Arrotti S; Monopoli DE; Sgura F; Rossi R; Guidi G; Boriani G
    Phys Med; 2022 Aug; 100():164-175. PubMed ID: 35901630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting radiation exposure during transradial cardiac catheterisation and percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Mantis C; Papadakis E; Anadiotis A; Kafkas N; Patsilinakos S
    Clin Radiol; 2022 May; 77(5):e387-e393. PubMed ID: 35260233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Different Measures of Body Size on the Radiation Dose During Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results from a Large Single Center Cohort.
    Verdoia M; Pipan P; Viola O; Francesca Brancati M; La Cognata S; Novara F; Bristot F; D'Amico G; Ravetto C; Fusco M; Giachino P; Tonella M; Maccagni D; Soldà PL; Marcolongo M
    Angiology; 2022 May; 73(5):478-484. PubMed ID: 35049400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trends and predictors of radiation exposure in percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECTION VIII study.
    Stocker TJ; Abdel-Wahab M; Möllmann H; Deseive S; Massberg S; Hausleiter J
    EuroIntervention; 2022 Jul; 18(4):e324-e332. PubMed ID: 35076020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A retrospective study of radiation dose measurements comparing different cath lab X-ray systems in a sample population of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions.
    McNeice AH; Brooks M; Hanratty CG; Stevenson M; Spratt JC; Walsh SJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 92(3):E254-E261. PubMed ID: 29411518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of Low-Dose Compared With Standard-Dose Radiation for Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention (KAR RAD Study).
    Kar S; Teleb M; Albaghdadi A; Ibrahim A; Mukherjee D
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 31(6):187-194. PubMed ID: 30865914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of Patient BMI on Patient and Operator Radiation Dose During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Crowhurst J; Savage M; Hay K; Murdoch D; Aroney N; Dautov R; Walters DL; Raffel OC
    Heart Lung Circ; 2022 Mar; 31(3):372-382. PubMed ID: 34654649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient radiation exposure in right versus left trans-radial approach for coronary procedures.
    Rigattieri S; Di Russo C; Cera M; Fedele S; Sciahbasi A; Pugliese FR
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015; 16(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 25576274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Local Dose Reference Values for Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusions and Other Occlusions in a High-Volume Catheterization Center.
    Maccia C; Malchair F; Gobert I; Louvard Y; Lefevre T
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 116(8):1179-84. PubMed ID: 26275581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Impact of Novel X-Ray Systems and X-Ray System Optimization on Patient Radiation Dose Administered During Cardiac Catheterization.
    Vemmou E; Nikolakopoulos I; Xenogiannis I; Megaly M; Omer MA; Stanberry L; Garberich R; Rangan BV; Baran KW; Gössl M; Sorajja P; Chavez I; Mooney M; Traverse J; Wang Y; Garcia S; Poulose A; Burke MN; Brilakis ES
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 32(6):218-221. PubMed ID: 32385193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The utilisation of the cardiovascular automated radiation reduction X-ray system (CARS) in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory aids in the reduction of the patient radiation dose.
    Didier R; Magalhaes MA; Koifman E; Leven F; Castellant P; Boschat J; Jobic Y; Kiramijyan S; Nicol PP; Gilard M
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Oct; 12(8):e948-e956. PubMed ID: 27721211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimizing exposure to radiation in invasive cardiology using modern dose-reduction technology: Evaluation of the real-life effects.
    Faroux L; Blanpain T; Nazeyrollas P; Tassan-Mangina S; Herce B; Tourneux C; Metz D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1194-1199. PubMed ID: 28862392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation Exposure of the Operator During Coronary Interventions (from the RADIO Study).
    Kallinikou Z; Puricel SG; Ryckx N; Togni M; Baeriswyl G; Stauffer JC; Cook S; Verdun FR; Goy JJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2016 Jul; 118(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 27239022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation Protocol for Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography to Limit Procedural Radiation Exposure in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Lab.
    Haddad L; Waller BR; Johnson J; Choudhri A; McGhee V; Zurakowski D; Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Sathanandam S
    Congenit Heart Dis; 2016 Dec; 11(6):637-646. PubMed ID: 27079433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective analysis of coronary interventions in a single centre and comparison of specific differences between radial and femoral access.
    Rychlik J; Hornacek I; Tejc M; Petrikovits E; Klimsa Z
    Acta Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 74(4):325-330. PubMed ID: 30193077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital zoom is a useful, simple, and cost-effective method of reducing radiation exposure in percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Hasegawa K; Umemoto N; Inoue S; Iio Y; Shibata N; Mizutani T; Sawamura A; Sugiura T; Taniguchi T; Asai T; Yamada M; Ishii H; Murohara T; Shimizu K
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2020 Oct; 35(4):353-360. PubMed ID: 31939067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention is associated with lower patient radiation exposure in high-radial-volume centres: Insights from the RAY'ACT-1 study.
    Georges JL; Belle L; Meunier L; Dechery T; Khalifé K; Pecheux M; Elhaddad S; Amabile N; Pansieri M; Ballout J; Marchand X; Rouault G; Leddet P; Nugue O; Lucke N; Cattan S;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Mar; 110(3):179-187. PubMed ID: 28117244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center.
    Kagiyama K; Mitsutake Y; Ueno T; Sakai S; Nakamura T; Yamaji K; Ishimatsu T; Sasaki M; Chibana H; Itaya N; Sasaki KI; Fukumoto Y
    Heart Vessels; 2021 Jul; 36(7):955-964. PubMed ID: 33502572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
    Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.