159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36136885)
41. Impact of patient obesity on radiation doses received by scrub technologists during coronary angiography.
Refahiyat L; VanOosterhout S; Mulder A; Ten Brock T; Parker JL; Negash A; Jacoby ME; Madder RD
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Dec; 19(8):929-933. PubMed ID: 30077495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effect of a real-time radiation monitoring device on operator radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization: the radiation reduction during cardiac catheterization using real-time monitoring study.
Christopoulos G; Papayannis AC; Alomar M; Kotsia A; Michael TT; Rangan BV; Roesle M; Shorrock D; Makke L; Layne R; Grabarkewitz R; Haagen D; Maragkoudakis S; Mohammad A; Sarode K; Cipher DJ; Chambers CE; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 25423958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Minimizing scattered radiation dose in cardiac catheterization laboratory during interventional procedures using lead free drape - MILD study.
Bhat KG; Guleria VS; Singla M; Bohra V; Kumar J R; Bharadwaj P; Datta R; Hasija PK
Indian Heart J; 2022; 74(3):201-205. PubMed ID: 35427629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Is trans-radial approach related to an increased risk of radiation exposure in patients who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention? (The SAKARYA study).
Üreyen ÇM; Coşansu K; Vural MG; Şahin SE; Kocayigit I; Pabuccu MT; Aksoy MNM; Ağaç MT; Tatlı E; Gündüz H; Akdemir R
Anatol J Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 22(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 31264653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Radiation exposure in relation to the arterial access site used for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Plourde G; Pancholy SB; Nolan J; Jolly S; Rao SV; Amhed I; Bangalore S; Patel T; Dahm JB; Bertrand OF
Lancet; 2015 Nov; 386(10009):2192-203. PubMed ID: 26411986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Does Ad Hoc Coronary Intervention Reduce Radiation Exposure? - Analysis of 568 Patients.
Truffa MA; Alves GM; Bernardi F; Esteves Filho A; Ribeiro E; Galon MZ; Spadaro A; Kajita LJ; Arrieta R; Lemos PA
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2015 Nov; 105(5):487-92. PubMed ID: 26351982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose-area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures.
Chida K; Saito H; Otani H; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S; Yamada S; Shirato K; Zuguchi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Mar; 186(3):774-8. PubMed ID: 16498105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effect of Vascular Access Site Choice on Radiation Exposure During Coronary Angiography: The REVERE Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Vascular Entry Site and Radiation Exposure).
Pancholy SB; Joshi P; Shah S; Rao SV; Bertrand OF; Patel TM
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 8(9):1189-1196. PubMed ID: 26210808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Conversion factors of effective and equivalent organ doses with the air kerma area product in patients undergoing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions.
Brambilla M; Cannillo B; Matheoud R; Compagnone G; Rognoni A; Bongo AS; Carriero A
Phys Med; 2017 Oct; 42():189-196. PubMed ID: 29173914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Fluoroscopy pulse rate reduction during diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: An evaluation of radiation dose, procedure complications and outcomes.
Hansen JW; Foy A; Schmidt T; Ghahramani M; Chambers CE
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 89(4):665-670. PubMed ID: 27121130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Predictors of Excess Patient Radiation Exposure During Chronic Total Occlusion Coronary Intervention: Insights From a Contemporary Multicentre Registry.
Christakopoulos GE; Christopoulos G; Karmpaliotis D; Alaswad K; Yeh RW; Jaffer FA; Wyman MR; Lombardi WL; Tarar MN; Grantham JA; Kandzari DE; Lembo N; Moses JW; Kirtane AJ; Parikh M; Green P; Finn M; Garcia S; Doing AH; Hatem R; Thompson CA; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
Can J Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 33(4):478-484. PubMed ID: 28169091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Reduction of radiation exposure in transcatheter atrial septal defect closure: How low must we go?
Sitefane F; Malekzadeh-Milani S; Villemain O; Ladouceur M; Boudjemline Y
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2018 Mar; 111(3):189-198. PubMed ID: 29097111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Impact of a Disposable Sterile Radiation Shield on Operator Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Chronic Total Occlusions.
Shorrock D; Christopoulos G; Wosik J; Kotsia A; Rangan B; Abdullah S; Cipher D; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
J Invasive Cardiol; 2015 Jul; 27(7):313-6. PubMed ID: 26136277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Radiation dose exposure during cardiac and peripheral arteries catheterisation.
Kocinaj D; Cioppa A; Ambrosini G; Tesorio T; Salemme L; Sorropago G; Rubino P; Picano E
Int J Cardiol; 2006 Nov; 113(2):283-4. PubMed ID: 16330116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Transradial access and radiation exposure in diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures.
Rigattieri S; Sciahbasi A; Drefahl S; Mussino E; Cera M; Di Russo C; Fedele S; Pugliese FR
J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Sep; 26(9):469-74. PubMed ID: 25198491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effective and equivalent organ doses in patients undergoing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Compagnone G; Ortolani P; Domenichelli S; Ovi V; Califano G; Dall'Ara G; Marzocchi A
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2168-75. PubMed ID: 21626950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Cardiac catheterization real-time dynamic radiation dose measurement to estimate lifetime attributable risk of cancer.
Tu CY; Lin CJ; Yang BH; Wu J; Wu TH
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234461. PubMed ID: 32544209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Improved image quality with simultaneously reduced radiation exposure: Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithms for coronary CT angiography in a clinical setting.
André F; Fortner P; Vembar M; Mueller D; Stiller W; Buss SJ; Kauczor HU; Katus HA; Korosoglou G
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(3):213-220. PubMed ID: 28314613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Determinants of Greater Peak Radiation Skin Dose in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
Hasegawa H; Sakakura K; Hamamoto K; Yamamoto K; Taniguchi Y; Tsukui T; Seguchi M; Wada H; Momomura SI; Fujita H
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Jan; 21(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 30948291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A randomised comparison of monoplane versus biplane fluoroscopy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the RAMBO trial.
Leistner DM; Schlender LS; Steiner J; Erbay A; Klotsche J; Schauerte P; Haghikia A; Rauch-Kröhnert U; Sinning D; Lauten A; Mochmann HC; Skurk C; Landmesser U; Stähli BE
EuroIntervention; 2020 Oct; 16(8):672-679. PubMed ID: 32392169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
