These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36137410)

  • 1. A stochastic model validated with human test data causally associating target vehicle Delta V, occupant cervicocranial biomechanics, and injury during rear-impact crashes.
    Kohles SS; McClaren JW
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2022 Oct; 91():102431. PubMed ID: 36137410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is Acceleration a Valid Proxy for Injury Risk in Minimal Damage Traffic Crashes? A Comparative Review of Volunteer, ADL and Real-World Studies.
    Nolet PS; Nordhoff L; Kristman VL; Croft AC; Zeegers MP; Freeman MD
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 33809101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Second-row occupant responses with and without intrusion in rear sled and crash tests.
    Parenteau CS; Viano DC; Burnett R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 33289580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Average male and female virtual dummy model (BioRID and EvaRID) simulations with two seat concepts in the Euro NCAP low severity rear impact test configuration.
    Linder A; Holmqvist K; Svensson MY
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():62-70. PubMed ID: 28622848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of seat properties on occupant dynamics in severe rear crashes.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Dec; 4(4):324-36. PubMed ID: 14630581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Internal loads in the cervical spine during motor vehicle rear-end impacts: the effect of acceleration and head-to-head restraint proximity.
    Tencer AF; Mirza S; Bensel K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jan; 27(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 11805633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Vehicle-Based Crash Severity Metrics.
    Tsoi AH; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S132-9. PubMed ID: 26436222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seat properties affecting neck responses in rear crashes: a reason why whiplash has increased.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Sep; 4(3):214-27. PubMed ID: 14522646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motion sequence criteria for favorable occupant kinematics in rear impacts.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):189-195. PubMed ID: 36305804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of Rear-End collisions on triaxial acceleration to occupant cervical and lumbar Spines: An analysis of IIHS data.
    McCleery CH; Limousis-Gayda M; Rubio E; Sie M; Hashish R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106761. PubMed ID: 35772284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of occupant dynamics during moderate-to-high speed side impacts.
    Atarod M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 May; 235(5):546-565. PubMed ID: 33619979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rear-seat occupant demographics in rear impacts: Analysis of NASS-CDS.
    Parenteau CS; Viano DC; Lau EC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(3):218-223. PubMed ID: 33661075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seat influences on female neck responses in rear crashes: a reason why women have higher whiplash rates.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Sep; 4(3):228-39. PubMed ID: 14522647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numerical investigation of occupant injury risks in car-to-end terminal crashes using dummy-based injury criteria and vehicle-based crash severity metrics.
    Meng Y; Untaroiu C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 145():105700. PubMed ID: 32777560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of initial seated position in low speed rear-end impacts: a comparison with the TNO rear impact dummy (TRID) model.
    Venkataramana MP; Hans SA; Bawab SY; Keifer OP; Woodhouse ML; Layson PD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 15823879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical spine injury in rollover crashes: Anthropometry, excursion, roof deformation, and ATD prediction.
    Roberts CW; Toczyski J; Kerrigan JR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Apr; 64():42-48. PubMed ID: 29703416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The RID2 biofidelic rear impact dummy: a pilot study using human subjects in low speed rear impact full scale crash tests.
    Croft AC; Philippens MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Mar; 39(2):340-6. PubMed ID: 17094931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rebound after rear impacts.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 23343027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting head injury metrics during low- to moderate-speed frontal collisions using computational simulations.
    Jeffs SB; Nolasco LA; Petroskey KJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Dec; 193():107303. PubMed ID: 37769479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Injuries in Full-Scale Vehicle Side Impact Moving Deformable Barrier and Pole Tests Using Postmortem Human Subjects.
    Yoganandan N; Pintar F; Humm J; Rudd R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S224-30. PubMed ID: 26436236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.