These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36137931)
1. Using a scheduled caesarean birth plan: A cross-sectional exploration of women's perspectives. Barnes C; Mignacca E; Mabbott K; Officer K; Hauck Y; Bradfield Z Women Birth; 2023 May; 36(3):264-270. PubMed ID: 36137931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What are women's experiences of immediate skin-to-skin contact at caesarean section birth? An integrative literature review. Deys L; Wilson PV; Meedya DS Midwifery; 2021 Oct; 101():103063. PubMed ID: 34157585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning from women: Improving experiences of respectful maternity care during unplanned caesarean birth for women with diverse ethnicity and racial backgrounds. Chinkam S; Ibrahim BB; Diaz B; Steer-Massaro C; Kennedy HP; Shorten A Women Birth; 2023 Feb; 36(1):e125-e133. PubMed ID: 35610171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Women's experiences of their involvement around care decisions during a subsequent pregnancy after a previous caesarean birth in Western Australia. Chan MH; Hauck Y; Kuliukas L; Lewis L Women Birth; 2021 Sep; 34(5):e442-e450. PubMed ID: 33004288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Australian women's perception of their preparation for and actual experience of a recent scheduled caesarean birth. Lewis L; Hauck YL; Ritchie S; Barnett L; Nunan H; Rivers C Midwifery; 2014 Mar; 30(3):e131-6. PubMed ID: 24445077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland. Bonzon M; Gross MM; Karch A; Grylka-Baeschlin S Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():219-227. PubMed ID: 28478374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. From coercion to respectful care: women's interactions with health care providers when planning a VBAC. Keedle H; Schmied V; Burns E; Dahlen HG BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Jan; 22(1):70. PubMed ID: 35086509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality improvement of childbirth care (Adequate Birth Project) and the assessment of women's birth experience in Brazil: a structural equation modelling of a cross-sectional research. Filha MMT; Leite TH; Baldisserotto ML; Esteves-Pereira AP; do Carmo Leal M Reprod Health; 2022 Dec; 20(Suppl 2):1. PubMed ID: 36522792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Iranian women's perception on the determinants of birth experience: a qualitative study. Mirghafourvand M; Meedya S; Mohammadi E; Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S; Jafarabadi MA; Ghanbari-Homaie S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Oct; 22(1):751. PubMed ID: 36199065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conflicting attitudes between clinicians and women regarding maternal requested caesarean section: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Johansson M; Alvan J; Pettersson A; Hildingsson I BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Mar; 23(1):210. PubMed ID: 36978038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors. Karlström A; Nystedt A; Johansson M; Hildingsson I Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 20630634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 'Off everyone's radar': Australian women's experiences of medically necessary elective caesarean section. Bayes S; Fenwick J; Hauck Y Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e900-9. PubMed ID: 22341090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gaining insight into how women conceptualize satisfaction: Western Australian women's perception of their maternity care experiences. Lewis L; Hauck YL; Ronchi F; Crichton C; Waller L BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Feb; 16():29. PubMed ID: 26846257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors associated with women's birth beliefs and experiences of decision-making in the context of planned birth: A survey study. Coates D; Donnolley N; Foureur M; Thirukumar P; Henry A Midwifery; 2021 May; 96():102944. PubMed ID: 33610064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends in birth choices after caesarean section in Japan: A national survey examining information and access to vaginal birth after caesarean. Torigoe I; Shorten B; Yoshida S; Shorten A Midwifery; 2016 Jun; 37():49-56. PubMed ID: 27217237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Respectful maternity care and women's autonomy in decision making in Iceland: Application of scale instruments in a cross-sectional survey. Mangindin EL; Stoll K; Cadée F; Gottfreðsdóttir H; Swift EM Midwifery; 2023 Aug; 123():103687. PubMed ID: 37121063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prior childbirth experience and attitude towards subsequent vaginal birth after one caesarean delivery in Lagos, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. Akinlusi FM; Olayiwola AA; Rabiu KA; Oshodi YA; Ottun TA; Shittu KA BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Jan; 23(1):82. PubMed ID: 36717780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What women identify as positive aspects and areas for improvement of maternity care and services in Ireland: An online survey. Hannon K; Nilsen ABV; Murphy M; Eri TS; Leahy-Warren P; Corcoran P; Downe S; Daly D Women Birth; 2023 Jul; 36(4):341-348. PubMed ID: 36446715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Good birth narratives: Diverse South African women's perspectives. Chadwick RJ Midwifery; 2019 Oct; 77():1-8. PubMed ID: 31233989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]