These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36138461)

  • 21. Spatial cueing, sensory gating and selective response preparation: an ERP study on visuo-spatial orienting.
    Eimer M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(5):408-20. PubMed ID: 7691565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Arrow-elicited cueing effects at short intervals: Rapid attentional orienting or cue-target stimulus conflict?
    Green JJ; Woldorff MG
    Cognition; 2012 Jan; 122(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 21975079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rethinking human visual attention: spatial cueing effects and optimality of decisions by honeybees, monkeys and humans.
    Eckstein MP; Mack SC; Liston DB; Bogush L; Menzel R; Krauzlis RJ
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 85():5-19. PubMed ID: 23298793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Modulation of Exogenous Attention on Emotional Audiovisual Integration.
    Li Y; Li Z; Deng A; Zheng H; Chen J; Ren Y; Yang W
    Iperception; 2021; 12(3):20416695211018714. PubMed ID: 34104384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Emotional cue validity effects: The role of neurocognitive responses to emotion.
    Denefrio S; Simmons A; Jha A; Dennis-Tiwary TA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179714. PubMed ID: 28683069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial orienting of attention simultaneously cued by automatic social and nonsocial cues.
    Greene DJ; Zaidel E
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 221(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 22760583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two electrophysiological stages of spatial orienting towards fearful faces: early temporo-parietal activation preceding gain control in extrastriate visual cortex.
    Pourtois G; Thut G; Grave de Peralta R; Michel C; Vuilleumier P
    Neuroimage; 2005 May; 26(1):149-63. PubMed ID: 15862215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatial cueing in time-space synesthetes: An event-related brain potential study.
    Teuscher U; Brang D; Ramachandran VS; Coulson S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Oct; 74(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 20637536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Deconstructing Reorienting of Attention: Cue Predictiveness Modulates the Inhibition of the No-target Side and the Hemispheric Distribution of the P1 Response to Invalid Targets.
    Doricchi F; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Pinto M; Caratelli L; Cestari V; Rossi-Arnaud C; Lasaponara S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1046-1060. PubMed ID: 31967519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preparatory slow potentials and event-related potentials in an auditory cued attention task.
    Golob EJ; Pratt H; Starr A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Oct; 113(10):1544-57. PubMed ID: 12350430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Faster, more intense! The relation between electrophysiological reflections of attentional orienting, sensory gain control, and speed of responding.
    Talsma D; Mulckhuyse M; Slagter HA; Theeuwes J
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1178():92-105. PubMed ID: 17931607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Identification and location tasks rely on different mental processes: a diffusion model account of validity effects in spatial cueing paradigms with emotional stimuli.
    Imhoff R; Lange J; Germar M
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Mar; 33(2):231-244. PubMed ID: 29468932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visuospatial information processing load and the ratio between parietal cue and target P3 amplitudes in the Attentional Network Test.
    Abramov DM; Pontes M; Pontes AT; Mourao-Junior CA; Vieira J; Quero Cunha C; Tamborino T; Galhanone PR; deAzevedo LC; Lazarev VV
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Apr; 647():91-96. PubMed ID: 28336341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrophysiological correlates to cued attentional shifts in the visual and auditory modalities.
    Hugdahl K; Nordby H
    Behav Neural Biol; 1994 Jul; 62(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 7945141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Top-down matching singleton cues have no edge over top-down matching nonsingletons in spatial cueing.
    Schoeberl T; Goller F; Ansorge U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):241-249. PubMed ID: 29959614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reflexive orienting in response to short- and long-duration gaze cues in young, young-old, and old-old adults.
    Gayzur ND; Langley LK; Kelland C; Wyman SV; Saville AL; Ciernia AT; Padmanabhan G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):407-19. PubMed ID: 24170377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Graded Neuronal Modulations Related to Visual Spatial Attention.
    Mayo JP; Maunsell JH
    J Neurosci; 2016 May; 36(19):5353-61. PubMed ID: 27170131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceptual merging contributes to cueing effects.
    Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ; Hunt AR
    J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24961250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.