144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36139549)
21. A multicenter non-inferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1): study protocol of the LAUNCH 2 trial.
Wu X; Qiu L; Lou W; Wang X; Zhu T; Zhang Y; Hu W; Xue X; Zhu Z; Xiang L; Li J; Fang X; Gao S; Feng H; Diao W; Zhang H; Du M; Bai Y; Hou Y; Yan W; Feng H; Yu H; Zhu S; Du Y; Jiang H
Trials; 2022 Apr; 23(1):269. PubMed ID: 35395868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.
Nam JH; Kim JH; Kim DY; Kim MK; Yoo HJ; Kim YM; Kim YT; Mok JE
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jan; 92(1):277-83. PubMed ID: 14751171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Surgical Approach and Use of Uterine Manipulator Are Not Associated with LVSI in Surgery for Early-stage Cervical Cancer.
Liu Y; Huang S; Ming X; Jing H; Li Z
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 28(9):1573-1578. PubMed ID: 33497723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome.
Pellegrino A; Vizza E; Fruscio R; Villa A; Corrado G; Villa M; Dell'Anna T; Vitobello D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 18760562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer by pulling the round ligament without a uterine manipulator.
Meng S; Li Z; Chen L; Yang X; Su P; Wang Y; Yi P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Sep; 264():31-35. PubMed ID: 34271363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with enclosed colpotomy without the use of uterine manipulator for early-stage cervical cancer.
Ding B; Guan X; Duan K; Shen Y
J Minim Access Surg; 2021; 17(4):570-572. PubMed ID: 34558435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma.
Diaz JP; Sonoda Y; Leitao MM; Zivanovic O; Brown CL; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 18755500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of long-term survival of total abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: Korean multicenter, retrospective analysis.
Kwon BS; Roh HJ; Lee S; Yang J; Song YJ; Lee SH; Kim KH; Suh DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):642-648. PubMed ID: 33041070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Results in Higher Recurrence Rate Versus Open Abdominal Surgery for Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients With Tumor Size Less Than 2 Centimeter: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Chen X; Yu J; Zhao H; Hu Y; Zhu H
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():683231. PubMed ID: 34178675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China.
Hu TWY; Huang Y; Li N; Nie D; Li Z
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 32571892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy (mLPS-RH) vs laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy (LESS-RH) in early stage cervical cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
Fagotti A; Ghezzi F; Boruta DM; Scambia G; Escobar P; Fader AN; Malzoni M; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1005-9. PubMed ID: 24768978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes of Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Data Collected before the LACC Trial.
Pecorino B; D'Agate MG; Scibilia G; Scollo P; Giannini A; Di Donna MC; Chiantera V; Laganà AS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 36293758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A case-controlled study of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in a fellowship training program.
Zakashansky K; Chuang L; Gretz H; Nagarsheth NP; Rahaman J; Nezhat FR
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(5):1075-82. PubMed ID: 17386041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Chiva L; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Martin-Calvo N; Arévalo-Serrano J; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Aliyev S; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chacon E; Alcazar JL;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 32788262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: rationale, technique, results.
Gottschalk E; Lanowska M; Chiantera V; Marnitz S; Schneider A; Brink-Spalink V; Hasenbein K; Koehler C
JSLS; 2011; 15(4):451-9. PubMed ID: 22643498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea.
Kim SI; Lee M; Lee S; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim YB
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 155(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 31383569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Effects of colpotomic approaches on prognosis and recurrence sites of stage Ⅰa2-Ⅱa2 cervical cancer after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy].
Zhou D; Li YD; Ling KJ; Wang RW; Wang YZ; Tang S; Liang ZQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jan; 58(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 36720615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
Chen C; Liu P; Ni Y; Tang L; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 25(5):937-947. PubMed ID: 32062731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
