These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3614037)

  • 21. Comparison of efficacy of pulsed biphasic waveform and rectilinear biphasic waveform in a short ventricular fibrillation pig model.
    Li Y; Wang H; Cho JH; Didon JP; Bisera J; Weil MH; Tang W
    Resuscitation; 2009 Sep; 80(9):1047-51. PubMed ID: 19604618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multicenter study of principles-based waveforms for external defibrillation.
    Bain AC; Swerdlow CD; Love CJ; Ellenbogen KA; Deering TF; Brewer JE; Augostini RS; Tchou PJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Jan; 37(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 11145764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The strength-duration relationship of monophasic waveforms with varying capacitance sizes in external defibrillation.
    Yamanouchi Y; Mowrey K; Mazgalev TN; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Dec; 26(12):2213-8. PubMed ID: 14675002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A model of ischemically induced ventricular fibrillation for comparison of fixed-dose and escalating-dose defibrillation strategies.
    Niemann JT; Rosborough JP; Walker RG
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Jun; 11(6):619-24. PubMed ID: 15175198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Encircling overlapping multipulse shock waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation.
    Pagan-Carlo LA; Allan JJ; Spencer KT; Birkett CL; Myers R; Kerber RE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Dec; 32(7):2065-71. PubMed ID: 9857894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transthoracic defibrillation threshold of sine and trapezoidal waveforms in defibrillation.
    Wilson CM; Bailey A; Allen JD; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    J Electrocardiol; 1989 Jul; 22(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 2760559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cardiac damage produced by transchest damped sine wave shocks.
    Tacker WA; Davis JS; Lie JT; Titus JL; Geddes LA
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 634186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficacy of transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using a biphasic, truncated exponential shock waveform at variable initial shock energies.
    Rashba EJ; Gold MR; Crawford FA; Leman RB; Peters RW; Shorofsky SR
    Am J Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 94(12):1572-4. PubMed ID: 15589022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of rapid biphasic shock subpulse switching on ventricular defibrillation thresholds.
    Dosdall DJ; Rothe DE; Brandon TA; Sweeney JD
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):802-8. PubMed ID: 15250866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of biphasic waveform design on post-resuscitation myocardial function.
    Tang W; Weil MH; Sun S; Jorgenson D; Morgan C; Klouche K; Snyder D
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Apr; 43(7):1228-35. PubMed ID: 15063435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transthoracic defibrillation with chopping-modulated biphasic waveforms.
    Krasteva V; Cansell A; Daskalov IK
    J Med Eng Technol; 2001; 25(4):163-8. PubMed ID: 11601443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative efficacy of damped sine wave and square wave current for transchest ventricular defibrillation in animals.
    Bourland JD; Tacker WA; Geddes LA; Chafee V
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 634190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of transthoracic square-wave defibrillation experience in the dog and calf.
    Gold JH; Schuder JC; Stoeckle H; Granberg TA; Hamdani SZ; Rychlewski JM
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 634184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Strength-duration curves of fixed pulse width variable tilt truncated exponential waveforms for nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation in dogs.
    Chapman PD; Wetherbee JN; Vetter JW; Troup P; Souza J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Jul; 11(7):1045-50. PubMed ID: 2457883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of shock waveforms on defibrillation efficacy.
    Alferness C; Ideker RE
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1990; 9(2):25-7. PubMed ID: 18238330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Temporal stability and precision of ventricular defibrillation threshold data.
    Babbs CF; Whistler SJ; Yim GK
    Am J Physiol; 1978 Nov; 235(5):H553-8. PubMed ID: 31797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biphasic truncated exponential waveform defibrillation.
    White RD; Blanton DM
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 1999; 3(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 10534026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy of monophasic electrical impulses with steep leading and trailing edges in cardiac defibrillation.
    Raugalas E; Blazek Z; Vrána M
    Cor Vasa; 1977; 19(4-5):376-84. PubMed ID: 598211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: reappraisal of the "defibrillation threshold" concept.
    Davy JM; Fain ES; Dorian P; Winkle RA
    Am Heart J; 1987 Jan; 113(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 3799444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Energy and current requirements for ventricular defibrillation using trapezoidal waves.
    Geddes LA; Bourland JD; Tacker WA
    Am J Physiol; 1980 Feb; 238(2):H231-6. PubMed ID: 7361919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.