These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3614037)

  • 41. The effect of shock separation time on multiple-shock defibrillation.
    Moore TW; DiMeo FN; Dubin SE
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 634187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of the operating internal resistance, inductance, and capacitance of intact damped sine wave defibrillators.
    Babbs CF; Whistler SJ
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 634188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Sequential pulse internal defibrillation: is there an advantage to "switched" current pathways?
    Fain ES; Sweeney MB; Franz MR
    Am Heart J; 1989 Oct; 118(4):717-24. PubMed ID: 2801478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The defibrillation success rate versus energy relationship: Part I--Curve fitting and the most efficient defibrillation energy.
    Gliner BE; Murakawa Y; Thakor NV
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Mar; 13(3):326-38. PubMed ID: 1690405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison between two defibrillation waveforms.
    Kostov J; Mudrov T; Dotsinsky I; Mudrov N
    J Med Eng Technol; 2010; 34(7-8):429-36. PubMed ID: 20858038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Ventricular defibrillating threshold: strength-duration and percent-success curves.
    Geddes LA; Tacker WA; Babbs CF; Bourland JD
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1997 Jul; 35(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 9327602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Limitations of the countershock dose response: a study of transthoracic current.
    Wesley RC; Morgan D; Zimmerman D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 2):1855-9. PubMed ID: 1721188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Defibrillation efficacy. Comparison of defibrillation threshold versus dose-response curve determination.
    Jones DL; Irish WD; Klein GJ
    Circ Res; 1991 Jul; 69(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2054941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Determination of safety factor for defibrillator waveforms in cultured heart cells.
    Jones JL; Jones RE
    Am J Physiol; 1982 Apr; 242(4):H662-70. PubMed ID: 7065279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Transepicardial defibrillation dose response: current versus energy.
    Wesley RC; Farkhani F; Porzio D; Kouri J; Resh W; Zimmerman D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jan; 16(1 Pt 2):193-7. PubMed ID: 7681570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Functional cardiac depression caused by defibrillator shocks. Quantitation of the safety factor for electrical defibrillation.
    Niebauer MJ; Babbs CF; Geddes LA; Carter JE; Bourland JD
    Jpn Heart J; 1984 Sep; 25(5):773-81. PubMed ID: 6512993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Electrical dose for ventricular defibrillation of large and small animals using precordial electrodes.
    Geddes LA; Tacker WA; Rosborough JP; Moore AG; Cabler PS
    J Clin Invest; 1974 Jan; 53(1):310-9. PubMed ID: 4808643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Efficacy and safety of defibrillation with rectangular waves of 2- to 20-milliseconds duration.
    Niebauer MJ; Babbs CF; Geddes LA; Bourland JD
    Crit Care Med; 1983 Feb; 11(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 6822087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The defibrillation efficacy of high frequency alternating current sinusoidal waveforms in guinea pigs.
    Roberts SJ; Guan D; Malkin R
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Feb; 26(2 Pt 1):599-604. PubMed ID: 12710320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Postshock arrhythmias--a possible cause of unsuccessful defibrillation.
    Jones JL; Jones RE
    Crit Care Med; 1980 Mar; 8(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 7363633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Estimating the parameter distributions of defibrillation shock efficacy curves in a large population.
    Smits K; Virag N
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Apr; 38(4):1314-25. PubMed ID: 20069370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Cardiac injury with damped sine and trapezoidal defibrillator waveforms.
    Wilson CM; Bailey A; Allen JD; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Eur Heart J; 1989 Jul; 10(7):628-36. PubMed ID: 2504609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of damped sine-wave shocks on catheter dielectric strength.
    Bardy GH; Coltorti F; Ivey TD; Yerkovich D; Greene HL
    Am J Cardiol; 1985 Nov; 56(12):769-72. PubMed ID: 4061299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Design for a constant peak current defibrillator.
    Machin JW; Brownhill J; Furness A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Jul; 37(7):723-30. PubMed ID: 2394461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical efficacy of a truncated exponential decay defibrillator.
    Tacker WA; Cole JS; Geddes LA
    J Electrocardiol; 1976; 9(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 939936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.