These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36140709)

  • 1. TwoStepCisMR: A Novel Method and R Package for Attenuating Bias in
    Woolf B; Zagkos L; Gill D
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 36140709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation.
    Carter AR; Sanderson E; Hammerton G; Richmond RC; Davey Smith G; Heron J; Taylor AE; Davies NM; Howe LD
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2021 May; 36(5):465-478. PubMed ID: 33961203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
    Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conditional inference in cis-Mendelian randomization using weak genetic factors.
    Patel A; Gill D; Newcombe P; Burgess S
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3458-3471. PubMed ID: 37337418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
    Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A two-sample robust Bayesian Mendelian Randomization method accounting for linkage disequilibrium and idiosyncratic pleiotropy with applications to the COVID-19 outcomes.
    Wang A; Liu W; Liu Z
    Genet Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 46(3-4):159-169. PubMed ID: 35192729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data.
    Burgess S; Butterworth A; Thompson SG
    Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 37(7):658-65. PubMed ID: 24114802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian approach to Mendelian randomisation with dependent instruments.
    Shapland CY; Thompson JR; Sheehan NA
    Stat Med; 2019 Mar; 38(6):985-1001. PubMed ID: 30485479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multivariable Mendelian Randomization and Mediation.
    Sanderson E
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 32341063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-Sample Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Analysis Using R.
    Rasooly D; Peloso GM
    Curr Protoc; 2021 Dec; 1(12):e335. PubMed ID: 34936225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Network Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways.
    Burgess S; Daniel RM; Butterworth AS; Thompson SG;
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):484-95. PubMed ID: 25150977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity Analyses for Robust Causal Inference from Mendelian Randomization Analyses with Multiple Genetic Variants.
    Burgess S; Bowden J; Fall T; Ingelsson E; Thompson SG
    Epidemiology; 2017 Jan; 28(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 27749700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects.
    Burgess S; Thompson SG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 181(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 25632051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting.
    Grant AJ; Burgess S
    Biostatistics; 2022 Apr; 23(2):609-625. PubMed ID: 33155035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Challenges and factors that influencing causal inference and interpretation, based on Mendelian randomization studies].
    Wang YZ; Shen HB
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 41(8):1231-1236. PubMed ID: 32867428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of maternal circulating 25(OH)D and calcium with birth weight: A mendelian randomisation analysis.
    Thompson WD; Tyrrell J; Borges MC; Beaumont RN; Knight BA; Wood AR; Ring SM; Hattersley AT; Freathy RM; Lawlor DA
    PLoS Med; 2019 Jun; 16(6):e1002828. PubMed ID: 31211782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mendelian randomization in health research: using appropriate genetic variants and avoiding biased estimates.
    Taylor AE; Davies NM; Ware JJ; VanderWeele T; Smith GD; Munafò MR
    Econ Hum Biol; 2014 Mar; 13(100):99-106. PubMed ID: 24388127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MRSamePopTest: introducing a simple falsification test for the two-sample mendelian randomisation 'same population' assumption.
    Woolf B; Mason A; Zagkos L; Sallis H; Munafò MR; Gill D
    BMC Res Notes; 2024 Jan; 17(1):27. PubMed ID: 38233927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies.
    Davey Smith G; Hemani G
    Hum Mol Genet; 2014 Sep; 23(R1):R89-98. PubMed ID: 25064373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MendelianRandomization: an R package for performing Mendelian randomization analyses using summarized data.
    Yavorska OO; Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1734-1739. PubMed ID: 28398548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.