BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36141917)

  • 21. Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic and Abdominal Surgery in the Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Saltari M; Mancini E; Sindico S; Vici P; Sergi D; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Pomati G; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 26825826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
    Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical Cancer in Light of the LACC Trial: What Have We Learned?
    Touhami O; Plante M
    Curr Oncol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):1093-1106. PubMed ID: 35200592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Trends and survival outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery for stage II uterine cancer.
    Abel MK; Chan JK; Chow S; Darcy K; Tian C; Kapp DS; Mann AK; Liao CI
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1347-1355. PubMed ID: 32753561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Overview of laparoscopic surgery for cervical cancer in Japan: Updates after the laparoscopic approach to cervical cancer trial.
    Kobayashi E; Kakuda M; Ueda Y; Kimura T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Jan; 49(1):90-102. PubMed ID: 36318924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
    Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: Rediscovering the Schautheim robot-assisted procedure.
    Courcier H; Azaïs H; Belghiti J; Uzan C; Canlorbe G
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Feb; 50(2):101980. PubMed ID: 33186773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Safety and efficacy study of laparoscopic or robotic radical surgery using an endoscopic stapler for inhibiting tumour spillage of cervical malignant neoplasms evaluating survival (SOLUTION): a multi-centre, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial protocol.
    Park SJ; Kong TW; Kim T; Lee M; Choi CH; Shim SH; Yim GW; Lee S; Lee EJ; Lim MC; Chang SJ; Lee SJ; Lee SH; Song T; Lee YY; Kim HS; Nam EJ
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Mar; 22(1):331. PubMed ID: 35346103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy with Enclosed Colpotomy and without the Use of Uterine Manipulator for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Yuan P; Liu Z; Qi J; Yang X; Hu T; Tan H
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1193-1198. PubMed ID: 30802608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Impact of the LACC study. A SFOG survey].
    Gauthier T; Lacorre A; Sallee C; Tardieu A; Guyon F; Margueritte F; Gouy S
    Bull Cancer; 2020 May; 107(5):551-555. PubMed ID: 32245607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Protective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups.
    Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Klapdor R; Hertel H; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Sep; 304(3):577-587. PubMed ID: 34021804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study.
    Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao M; Cibula D; Fotopoulou C; Kucukmetin A; Rendon G; Perrotta M; Ribeiro R; Vieira M; Baiocchi G; Falconer H; Persson J; Wu X; Căpilna ME; Ioanid N; Mosgaard BJ; Berlev I; Kaidarova D; Olawaiye AB; Liu K; Nobre SP; Kocian R; Saso S; Rundle S; Noll F; Tsunoda AT; Palsdottir K; Li X; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Pareja R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):635-638. PubMed ID: 30765489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic surgery for early stage cervical cancer: Evolution and current trends.
    Medlin EE; Kushner DM; Barroilhet L
    J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):772-81. PubMed ID: 26768315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally invasive radical trachelectomy: Considerations on surgical approach.
    Salvo G; Pareja R; Ramirez PT
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Sep; 75():113-122. PubMed ID: 33888410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Adenocarcinoma after Preoperative Brachytherapy in 10 Steps.
    Colombo PE; Nguyen VH; Taoum C; Mourregot A; Neron M; Kerr C; Rouanet P; Carrier G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1138-1139. PubMed ID: 33031927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study.
    Piedimonte S; Pond GR; Plante M; Nelson G; Kwon J; Altman A; Feigenberg T; Elit L; Lau S; Sabourin J; Willows K; Aubrey C; Jang JH; Teo-Fortin LA; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Shamiya S; Helpman L; Vicus D;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 35644731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Ramirez PT; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; dos Reis R; Frumovitz M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Sep; 110(3 Suppl 2):S21-4. PubMed ID: 18486966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.