284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36141917)
41. Radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: what shall we do after the LACC trial?
Hillemanns P; Hertel H; Klapdor R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Aug; 302(2):289-292. PubMed ID: 32495017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Sexual, bladder and bowel function following different minimally invasive techniques of radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Baessler K; Windemut S; Chiantera V; Köhler C; Sehouli J
Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Nov; 23(11):2335-2343. PubMed ID: 34003456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Changing treatment landscape for early cervical cancer: outcomes reported with minimally invasive surgery compared with an open approach.
Melamed A; Ramirez PT
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 32(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 31815768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Standardization and experience may influence the survival of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Lee CL; Huang KG; Chua PT; Mendoza MCVR; Lee PS; Lai SY
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 60(3):463-467. PubMed ID: 33966729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study.
Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao MM; Cibula D; Wu X; Falconer H; Persson J; Perrotta M; Mosgaard BJ; Kucukmetin A; Berlev I; Rendon G; Liu K; Vieira M; Capilna ME; Fotopoulou C; Baiocchi G; Kaidarova D; Ribeiro R; Pedra-Nobre S; Kocian R; Li X; Li J; Pálsdóttir K; Noll F; Rundle S; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Gheorghe M; Saso S; Bolatbekova R; Tsunoda A; Pitcher B; Wu J; Urbauer D; Pareja R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 226(1):97.e1-97.e16. PubMed ID: 34461074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Chiva L; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Martin-Calvo N; Arévalo-Serrano J; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Aliyev S; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chacon E; Alcazar JL;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 32788262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes of Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Data Collected before the LACC Trial.
Pecorino B; D'Agate MG; Scibilia G; Scollo P; Giannini A; Di Donna MC; Chiantera V; Laganà AS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 36293758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Minimally invasive surgery for radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgery position statement.
Kim M; Kong TW; Kim S; Kim SC; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park JY; Suh DH; Shim SH; Lee KH; Lee SJ; Lee JK; Lim MC
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 30(5):e104. PubMed ID: 31328466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Survival after a nationwide adoption of robotic minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer - A population-based study.
Jensen PT; Schnack TH; Frøding LP; Bjørn SF; Lajer H; Markauskas A; Jochumsen KM; Fuglsang K; Dinesen J; Søgaard CH; Søgaard-Andersen E; Jensen MM; Knudsen A; Øster LH; Høgdall C
Eur J Cancer; 2020 Mar; 128():47-56. PubMed ID: 32109850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Obermair A; Gebski V; Frumovitz M; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; Levenback C; Ramirez PT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):584-8. PubMed ID: 18722970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy without using uterine manipulator for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li RZ; Sun LF; Li R; Wang HJ
BJOG; 2023 Jan; 130(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 36331008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Current analysis of the survival implications for minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of early-stage cervix cancer.
Micha JP; Rettenmaier MA; Bohart RD; Goldstein BH
J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):80. PubMed ID: 38366169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Nitecki R; Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Krause KJ; Tergas AI; Wright JD; Rauh-Hain JA; Melamed A
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Jul; 6(7):1019-1027. PubMed ID: 32525511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Observational BGOG Study of the Results of Robot-assisted Laparoscopy in 166 Patients with FIGO 2009 Stage IA1-IB1 Cervical Cancer.
de Bruyn A; Peeters F; Smulders K; Goffin F; Traen K; Van Trappen P; Vergote I
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1920-1926. PubMed ID: 34000393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Learning Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Are We Facing an Emerging Situation?
Moufawad G; Laganà AS; Habib N; Chiantera V; Giannini A; Ferrari F; Vitagliano A; Della Corte L; Bifulco G; Sleiman Z
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Laparo-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy as a safe option for Minimal Invasive Surgery in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ronsini C; Köhler C; De Franciscis P; La Verde M; Mosca L; Solazzo MC; Colacurci N
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Jul; 166(1):188-195. PubMed ID: 35513934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
