These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3614252)
1. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with somatosensory testing in MS suspects. Eisen A; Odusote K; Li D; Robertson W; Purvis S; Eisen K; Paty D Muscle Nerve; 1987 Jun; 10(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 3614252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are somatosensory evoked potentials of the tibial nerve the most sensitive test in diagnosing multiple sclerosis? Djuric S; Djuric V; Zivkovic M; Milosevic V; Jolic M; Stamenovic J; Djordjevic G; Calixto M Neurol India; 2010; 58(4):537-41. PubMed ID: 20739788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and other techniques in 39 multiple sclerosis patients. Comi G; Canal N; Martinelli V; Medaglini S; Locatelli T; Triulzi F; Del Maschio A; Banfi G Riv Neurol; 1987; 57(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 3629129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Acute posterior cord lesions in multiple sclerosis. An MRI study of the clinical course in 20 cases]. Pou Serradell A; Roquer González J; Perich Alsina X Rev Neurol (Paris); 2000 Dec; 156(12):1126-35. PubMed ID: 11139729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis by evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study. Cutler JR; Aminoff MJ; Brant-Zawadzki M Ann Neurol; 1986 Nov; 20(5):645-8. PubMed ID: 3789682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A risk of developing multiple sclerosis following an outbreak of optic neuritis during a mean follow-up of 4.5 years]. Deyá E; Sevilla T; Coret F Neurologia; 1998 Oct; 13(8):377-81. PubMed ID: 9859669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The conduction of nerve impulses through MRIT2 hyperintense areas of patients with multiple sclerosis]. Iriarte J; de Castro P; Zubieta JL; Artieda J Neurologia; 1993; 8(6):194-6. PubMed ID: 8352976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Acute myelopathies in young patients and multiple sclerosis. prospective study of 20 cases]. Dalecky A; Pelletier J; Chérif AA; Lévrier O; Khalil R Rev Neurol (Paris); 1997 Oct; 153(10):569-78. PubMed ID: 9684021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association between clinical conversion to multiple sclerosis in radiologically isolated syndrome and magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and visual evoked potential: follow-up of 70 patients. Lebrun C; Bensa C; Debouverie M; Wiertlevski S; Brassat D; de Seze J; Rumbach L; Pelletier J; Labauge P; Brochet B; Tourbah A; Clavelou P; Arch Neurol; 2009 Jul; 66(7):841-6. PubMed ID: 19597085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive role of evoked potential examinations in patients with clinically isolated optic neuritis in light of the revised McDonald criteria. Simó M; Barsi P; Arányi Z Mult Scler; 2008 May; 14(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 18208873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of clinical, magnetic resonance imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid findings in optic neuritis. Jacobs LD; Kaba SE; Miller CM; Priore RL; Brownscheidle CM Ann Neurol; 1997 Mar; 41(3):392-8. PubMed ID: 9066361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis and neuro-Behçet's syndrome. Nakamura Y; Takahashi M; Kitaguchi M; Imaoka H; Tarui S Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989; 29(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 2702960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The diagnostic value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography, multimodal evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid examination in multiple sclerosis]. Staffen W; Trinka E; Ladurner G Nervenarzt; 1993 Apr; 64(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 8506010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]