These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36142589)
21. Electroporation-mediated genome editing in vitrified/warmed mouse zygotes created by IVF via ultra-superovulation. Nakagawa Y; Sakuma T; Takeo T; Nakagata N; Yamamoto T Exp Anim; 2018 Nov; 67(4):535-543. PubMed ID: 30012936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Recent Advances and Future Perspectives of In Vivo Targeted Delivery of Genome-Editing Reagents to Germ Cells, Embryos, and Fetuses in Mice. Sato M; Takabayashi S; Akasaka E; Nakamura S Cells; 2020 Mar; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 32225003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. GONAD: A Novel CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Method that Does Not Require Ex Vivo Handling of Embryos. Gurumurthy CB; Takahashi G; Wada K; Miura H; Sato M; Ohtsuka M Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 88():15.8.1-15.8.12. PubMed ID: 26724720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. GONAD: Genome-editing via Oviductal Nucleic Acids Delivery system: a novel microinjection independent genome engineering method in mice. Takahashi G; Gurumurthy CB; Wada K; Miura H; Sato M; Ohtsuka M Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11406. PubMed ID: 26096991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vivo genome editing targeted towards the female reproductive system. Sato M; Ohtsuka M; Nakamura S; Sakurai T; Watanabe S; Gurumurthy CB Arch Pharm Res; 2018 Sep; 41(9):898-910. PubMed ID: 29974342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. i-GONAD: a robust method for in situ germline genome engineering using CRISPR nucleases. Ohtsuka M; Sato M; Miura H; Takabayashi S; Matsuyama M; Koyano T; Arifin N; Nakamura S; Wada K; Gurumurthy CB Genome Biol; 2018 Feb; 19(1):25. PubMed ID: 29482575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Suitability of a universal electroporation device for genome editing and production of transgenic rats. Davachi ND; Bartlewski PM; Masoudi R; Fallahi R Reprod Biol; 2023 Jun; 23(2):100755. PubMed ID: 36933474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative analysis of mouse and human preimplantation development following POU5F1 CRISPR/Cas9 targeting reveals interspecies differences. Stamatiadis P; Boel A; Cosemans G; Popovic M; Bekaert B; Guggilla R; Tang M; De Sutter P; Van Nieuwerburgh F; Menten B; Stoop D; Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM; Coucke P; Heindryckx B Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 36(5):1242-1252. PubMed ID: 33609360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Protocol for the electroporation of CRISPR-Cas for DNA and RNA targeting in Bos taurus zygotes. Biase FH; Schettini G STAR Protoc; 2024 Mar; 5(1):102940. PubMed ID: 38460133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Zona pellucida treatment before CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing of porcine zygotes. Namula Z; Hirata M; Le QA; Lin Q; Takebayashi K; Yoshimura N; Tanihara F; Thongkittidilok C; Otoi T Vet Med Sci; 2022 Jan; 8(1):164-169. PubMed ID: 34674375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Efficient and Fast Generation of Relevant Disease Mouse Models by Sanchez-Baltasar R; Garcia-Torralba A; Nieto-Romero V; Page A; Molinos-Vicente A; López-Manzaneda S; Ojeda-Pérez I; Ramirez A; Navarro M; Segovia JC; García-Bravo M CRISPR J; 2022 Jun; 5(3):422-434. PubMed ID: 35686982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Vitrified before and after genome editing via electroporation. Nguyen TV; Kim Do LT; Namula Z; Lin QY; Torigoe N; Nagahara M; Hirata M; Tanihara F; Otoi TBRCTUTJ Cryo Letters; 2023; 44(2):118-122. PubMed ID: 37883162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Successful production of genome-edited rats by the rGONAD method. Kobayashi T; Namba M; Koyano T; Fukushima M; Sato M; Ohtsuka M; Matsuyama M BMC Biotechnol; 2018 Apr; 18(1):19. PubMed ID: 29606116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Mice by Zygote Electroporation of Nuclease. Qin W; Dion SL; Kutny PM; Zhang Y; Cheng AW; Jillette NL; Malhotra A; Geurts AM; Chen YG; Wang H Genetics; 2015 Jun; 200(2):423-30. PubMed ID: 25819794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Electroporation of mice zygotes with dual guide RNA/Cas9 complexes for simple and efficient cloning-free genome editing. Teixeira M; Py BF; Bosc C; Laubreton D; Moutin MJ; Marvel J; Flamant F; Markossian S Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):474. PubMed ID: 29323173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Gene editing in porcine embryos using a combination of electroporation and transfection methods. Takebayashi K; Wittayarat M; Lin Q; Hirata M; Yoshimura N; Torigoe N; Nagahara M; Do LTK; Tanihara F; Otoi T Reprod Domest Anim; 2022 Oct; 57(10):1136-1142. PubMed ID: 35699358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Developmental competence of porcine genome-edited zygotes. Gil MA; Martinez CA; Nohalez A; Parrilla I; Roca J; Wu J; Ross PJ; Cuello C; Izpisua JC; Martinez EA Mol Reprod Dev; 2017 Sep; 84(9):814-821. PubMed ID: 28471514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Electroporation enables the efficient mRNA delivery into the mouse zygotes and facilitates CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing. Hashimoto M; Takemoto T Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11315. PubMed ID: 26066060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Electroporation-Mediated Genome Editing of Livestock Zygotes. Lin JC; Van Eenennaam AL Front Genet; 2021; 12():648482. PubMed ID: 33927751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of electroporation treatment using different concentrations of Cas9 protein with gRNA targeting Myostatin (MSTN) genes on the development and gene editing of porcine zygotes. Le QA; Hirata M; Nguyen NT; Takebayashi K; Wittayarat M; Sato Y; Namula Z; Nii M; Tanihara F; Otoi T Anim Sci J; 2020; 91(1):e13386. PubMed ID: 32512638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]