141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36144100)
1. Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of the Effects of Temperature and Geometry Parameters on a Virtual Impactor.
Wang R; Zhao H; Li J; Wang X
Micromachines (Basel); 2022 Sep; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 36144100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design and Analysis of Particulate Matter Air-Microfluidic Grading Chip Based on MEMS.
Chen T; Sun J; Ma T; Li T; Liu C; Zhu X; Xue N
Micromachines (Basel); 2019 Jul; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 31357448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Designing a Microfluidic Chip Driven by Carbon Dioxide for Separation and Detection of Particulate Matter.
Wang R; Zhao H; Wang X; Li J
Micromachines (Basel); 2023 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 36677244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A hybrid chip based on aerodynamics and electrostatics for the size-dependent classification of ultrafine and nano particles.
Kim YH; Park D; Hwang J; Kim YJ
Lab Chip; 2009 Sep; 9(18):2722-8. PubMed ID: 19704989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. RADIOACTIVE AEROSOL SEPARATION CHARACTERISTICS STUDY OF A NOVEL SUBMICRON VIRTUAL IMPACTOR.
He Z; Hu L; Yang C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2023 Apr; 199(5):426-442. PubMed ID: 36747477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. System Integration of an Optimally Designed Virtual Impactor with a QCM Sensor as a One-Stop PM
Wang Y; Mei X; Xu Z; Qian J
ACS Omega; 2024 Feb; 9(5):5751-5760. PubMed ID: 38343940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrated particle detection chip for environmental monitoring.
Kim YH; Park D; Hwang J; Kim YJ
Lab Chip; 2008 Nov; 8(11):1950-6. PubMed ID: 18941698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calibration of sharp cut impactors for indoor and outdoor particle sampling.
Turner WA; Olson BA; Allen GA
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Apr; 50(4):484-7. PubMed ID: 10785998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deposition Pattern of Polydisperse Dry Powders in Andersen Cascade Impactor - Aerodynamic Assessment for Inhalation Experimentally and
Dechraksa J; Suwandecha T; Srichana T
Turk J Pharm Sci; 2020 Feb; 17(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 32454756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acceptance Testing of Used Cascade Impactor Stages Based on Pressure Drop Measurements in a Flow System Managed with a Critical Flow Venturi: Part I-Laboratory Proof-of-Principle.
Roberts DL
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2024 Feb; 37(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 38019195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. High throughput single-cell and multiple-cell micro-encapsulation.
Lagus TP; Edd JF
J Vis Exp; 2012 Jun; (64):e4096. PubMed ID: 22733254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution Between a Next Generation Impactor and a Cascade Impactor at a Range of Flow Rates.
Yoshida H; Kuwana A; Shibata H; Izutsu KI; Goda Y
AAPS PharmSciTech; 2017 Apr; 18(3):646-653. PubMed ID: 27173989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A personal cascade impactor: design, evaluation and calibration.
Rubow KL; Marple VA; Olin J; McCawley MA
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jun; 48(6):532-8. PubMed ID: 3618466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and performance evaluation of a two-stage cascade impactor equipped with gelatin filter substrates for the collection of multi-sized particulate matter.
Aldekheel M; Farahani VJ; Tohidi R; Altuwayjiri A; Sioutas C
Atmos Environ (1994); 2023 Feb; 294():. PubMed ID: 36504702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Next generation pharmaceutical impactor (a new impactor for pharmaceutical inhaler testing). Part I: Design.
Marple VA; Roberts DL; Romay FJ; Miller NC; Truman KG; Van Oort M; Olsson B; Holroyd MJ; Mitchell JP; Hochrainer D
J Aerosol Med; 2003; 16(3):283-99. PubMed ID: 14572326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How Cold Is Cold Enough? Refrigeration of the Next-Generation Impactor to Prevent Aerosol Undersizing.
Schuschnig U; Heine B; Knoch M
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2022 Jan; 35(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 34097468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Development of a two stage virtual impactor for stationary source PM10 and PM2.5 sampling].
Jiang JK; Deng JG; Duan L; Zhang Q; Li Z; Chen XT; Li XH; Hao JM
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2014 Oct; 35(10):3639-43. PubMed ID: 25693364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A small change in the design of a slit bioaerosol impactor significantly improves its collection characteristics.
Grinshpun SA; Adhikari A; Cho SH; Kim KY; Lee T; Reponen T
J Environ Monit; 2007 Aug; 9(8):855-61. PubMed ID: 17671667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of impactor inlet efficiency on the measurement of wood dust size distribution.
Li SN; Lundgren DA; Rovell-Rixx D; Ray AE
AIHAJ; 2001; 62(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 11258864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of inhalation aerosols: a critical evaluation of cascade impactor analysis and laser diffraction technique.
de Boer AH; Gjaltema D; Hagedoorn P; Frijlink HW
Int J Pharm; 2002 Dec; 249(1-2):219-31. PubMed ID: 12433450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
