221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36145891)
41. Cornmeal Graphene/Natural Rubber Nanocomposites: Effect of Modified Graphene on Mechanical and Thermal Properties.
Wu W; Yu B
ACS Omega; 2020 Apr; 5(15):8551-8556. PubMed ID: 32337416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Silicone Rubber Composites Reinforced by Carbon Nanofillers and Their Hybrids for Various Applications: A Review.
Kumar V; Alam MN; Manikkavel A; Song M; Lee DJ; Park SS
Polymers (Basel); 2021 Jul; 13(14):. PubMed ID: 34301079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Biotemplate synthesis of polyaniline@cellulose nanowhiskers/natural rubber nanocomposites with 3D hierarchical multiscale structure and improved electrical conductivity.
Wu X; Lu C; Xu H; Zhang X; Zhou Z
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2014 Dec; 6(23):21078-85. PubMed ID: 25384188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. All carbohydrate-based nanocomposites composed of sorbitol polyglycidyl ether, aminated trehalose and cellulose nanofiber.
Sugai K; Sugane K; Teramoto N; Shibata M
Carbohydr Polym; 2020 Mar; 232():115779. PubMed ID: 31952588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cellulose-nanofiber-reinforced poly(lactic acid) composites prepared by a water-based approach.
Wang T; Drzal LT
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2012 Oct; 4(10):5079-85. PubMed ID: 22991937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Strengthened self-healable natural rubber composites based on carboxylated cellulose nanofibers participated in ionic supramolecular network.
Wu M; Yang L; Zheng Z; Wan F; Teng X; Xu C
Int J Biol Macromol; 2022 Dec; 222(Pt A):587-598. PubMed ID: 36167103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Spherical CaCO
Longkaew K; Gibaud A; Tessanan W; Daniel P; Phinyocheep P
Polymers (Basel); 2023 Oct; 15(21):. PubMed ID: 37959967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Bio-based thermoplastic natural rubber based on poly(lactic acid)/thermoplastic starch/calcium carbonate nanocomposites.
Wongwat S; Yoksan R; Hedenqvist MS
Int J Biol Macromol; 2022 May; 208():973-982. PubMed ID: 35364197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Efficient Softening and Toughening Strategies of Cellulose Nanofibril Nanocomposites Using Comb Polyurethane.
Aoki D; Lossada F; Hoenders D; Ajiro H; Walther A
Biomacromolecules; 2022 Apr; 23(4):1693-1702. PubMed ID: 35362317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The antimicrobial bio-nanocomposite containing non-hydrolyzed cellulose nanofiber (CNF) and Miswak (Salvadora persica L.) extract.
Ahmadi R; Ghanbarzadeh B; Ayaseh A; Kafil HS; Özyurt H; Katourani A; Ostadrahimi A
Carbohydr Polym; 2019 Jun; 214():15-25. PubMed ID: 30925983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Research on the Strengthening Advantages on Using Cellulose Nanofibers as Polyvinyl Alcohol Reinforcement.
Tarrés Q; Oliver-Ortega H; Alcalà M; Espinach FX; Mutjé P; Delgado-Aguilar M
Polymers (Basel); 2020 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 32331220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Cellulose Nanofiber/Carbon Nanotube Conductive Nano-Network as a Reinforcement Template for Polydimethylsiloxane Nanocomposite.
Chen C; Bu X; Feng Q; Li D
Polymers (Basel); 2018 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 30960925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effect of surface chemistry on the dispersion and pH-responsiveness of chitin nanofibers/ natural rubber latex nanocomposites.
Yin J; Hou J; Huang S; Li N; Zhong M; Zhang Z; Geng Y; Ding B; Chen Y; Duan Y; Zhang J
Carbohydr Polym; 2019 Mar; 207():555-562. PubMed ID: 30600039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Fabrication and characterization of starch-based nanocomposites reinforced with montmorillonite and cellulose nanofibers.
Li J; Zhou M; Cheng G; Cheng F; Lin Y; Zhu PX
Carbohydr Polym; 2019 Apr; 210():429-436. PubMed ID: 30732779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of Cellulose Nanofiber (CNF) Surface Treatment on Cellular Structures and Mechanical Properties of Polypropylene/CNF Nanocomposite Foams via Core-Back Foam Injection Molding.
Wang L; Okada K; Hikima Y; Ohshima M; Sekiguchi T; Yano H
Polymers (Basel); 2019 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 30960233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Thermoformable and transparent one-component nanocomposites based on surface grafted cellulose nanofiber.
Chen S; Li D; Song F; Wang XL; Wang YZ
Int J Biol Macromol; 2022 Dec; 223(Pt A):213-222. PubMed ID: 36347373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Cellulose nanocrystals vs. cellulose nanofibrils: a comparative study on their microstructures and effects as polymer reinforcing agents.
Xu X; Liu F; Jiang L; Zhu JY; Haagenson D; Wiesenborn DP
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2013 Apr; 5(8):2999-3009. PubMed ID: 23521616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A Comparative Study on the Characterization of Nanofibers with Cellulose I, I/II, and II Polymorphs from Wood.
Wang H; Li S; Wu T; Wang X; Cheng X; Li D
Polymers (Basel); 2019 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 30960137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Synthesis and characterization of cellulose nanofibers (CNF) ramie reinforced cassava starch hybrid composites.
Syafri E; Kasim A; Abral H; Sudirman ; Sulungbudi GT; Sanjay MR; Sari NH
Int J Biol Macromol; 2018 Dec; 120(Pt A):578-586. PubMed ID: 30165147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Ultra-low gas permeable cellulose nanofiber nanocomposite films filled with highly oriented graphene oxide nanosheets induced by shear field.
Ren F; Tan W; Duan Q; Jin Y; Pei L; Ren P; Yan D
Carbohydr Polym; 2019 Apr; 209():310-319. PubMed ID: 30732813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
