These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36148152)

  • 41. Dipole localization of human induced focal afterdischarge seizure in simultaneous magnetoencephalography and electrocorticography.
    Sutherling WW; Akhtari M; Mamelak AN; Mosher J; Arthur D; Sands S; Weiss P; Lopez N; DiMauro M; Flynn E; Leah R
    Brain Topogr; 2001; 14(2):101-16. PubMed ID: 11797809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data.
    Mosher JC; Lewis PS; Leahy RM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Jun; 39(6):541-57. PubMed ID: 1601435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effect of artifact rejection by signal-space projection on source localization accuracy in MEG measurements.
    Nolte G; Curio G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Apr; 46(4):400-8. PubMed ID: 10217878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Multi-channel whole-head OPM-MEG: Helmet design and a comparison with a conventional system.
    Hill RM; Boto E; Rea M; Holmes N; Leggett J; Coles LA; Papastavrou M; Everton SK; Hunt BAE; Sims D; Osborne J; Shah V; Bowtell R; Brookes MJ
    Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 219():116995. PubMed ID: 32480036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Neuro-current response functions: A unified approach to MEG source analysis under the continuous stimuli paradigm.
    Das P; Brodbeck C; Simon JZ; Babadi B
    Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116528. PubMed ID: 31945510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and other neurophysiological investigations.
    Paetau R; Mohamed IS
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2013; 111():461-5. PubMed ID: 23622195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.
    Hedrich T; Pellegrino G; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():531-544. PubMed ID: 28619655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
    Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. MEG for Greater Sensitivity and More Precise Localization in Epilepsy.
    Burgess RC
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2020 May; 30(2):145-158. PubMed ID: 32336403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dipole source analysis for readiness potential and field using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals.
    Mideksa KG; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1362-5. PubMed ID: 24109949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Bayesian analysis of the neuromagnetic inverse problem with l(p)-norm priors.
    Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Vehtari A; Sams M
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):870-84. PubMed ID: 15955497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sensitivity of a 29-Channel MEG Source Montage.
    Nenonen J; Helle L; Jaiswal A; Bock E; Ille N; Bornfleth H
    Brain Sci; 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35053848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Magnetoencephalography recording and analysis.
    Velmurugan J; Sinha S; Satishchandra P
    Ann Indian Acad Neurol; 2014 Mar; 17(Suppl 1):S113-9. PubMed ID: 24791077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Magnetoencephalography for epileptic focus localization based on Tucker decomposition with ripple window.
    Shi LJ; Wei BX; Xu L; Lin YC; Wang YP; Zhang JC
    CNS Neurosci Ther; 2021 Jul; 27(7):820-830. PubMed ID: 33942534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The coupled dipole model: an integrated model for multiple MEG/EEG data sets.
    Bijma F; de Munck JC; Böcker KB; Huizenga HM; Heethaar RM
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):890-904. PubMed ID: 15528089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Distinguishing between moving and stationary sources using EEG/MEG measurements with an application to epilepsy.
    Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Lewine JD; Muravchik CH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 15759577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. MEG and EEG dipole clusters from extended cortical sources.
    Fuchs M; Kastner J; Tech R; Wagner M; Gasca F
    Biomed Eng Lett; 2017 Aug; 7(3):185-191. PubMed ID: 30603165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Magnetic source imaging for the surgical evaluation of electroencephalography-confirmed secondary bilateral synchrony in intractable epilepsy.
    Chang EF; Nagarajan SS; Mantle M; Barbaro NM; Kirsch HE
    J Neurosurg; 2009 Dec; 111(6):1248-56. PubMed ID: 19575574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Transforming and comparing data between standard SQUID and OPM-MEG systems.
    Marhl U; Jodko-Władzińska A; Brühl R; Sander T; Jazbinšek V
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262669. PubMed ID: 35045107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.