125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36149168)
1. A mathematical model to predict the different isodose volumes using TRAK value in HDR intracavitary brachytherapy for revised Manchester and ICRU-89 based Point A plans using computer tomography images.
Mourya A; Choudhary S; Sharma N; Shahi UP; Singh G; Pradhan S; Aggarwal LM
J Cancer Res Ther; 2022; 18(4):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 36149168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison between revised Manchester Point A and ICRU-89-recommended Point A definition absorbed-dose reporting using CT images in intracavitary brachytherapy for patients with cervical carcinoma.
Mourya A; Choudhary S; Shahi UP; Sharma N; Gautam H; Patel G; Pradhan S; Aggarwal LM
Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(1):118-127. PubMed ID: 32811759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric Comparison of Isodose Surface Volume and Total Reference Air Kerma (TRAK) based Volume in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy.
Thimmaiah N; Malavade V; A S UK; S S; Pasha C R T; Vishwanath L
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2024 Feb; 25(2):587-594. PubMed ID: 38415545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total reference air kerma: to what extent can it predict intracavitary volume enclosed by isodose surfaces during multiple high-dose rate brachytherapy?
Datta NR; Das KJ; Basu R; Singh U
Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 15062146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Definitive radiotherapy based on HDR brachytherapy with iridium 192 in uterine cervix carcinoma: report on the Vienna University Hospital findings (1993-1997) compared to the preceding period in the context of ICRU 38 recommendations.
Pötter R; Knocke TH; Fellner C; Baldass M; Reinthaller A; Kucera H
Cancer Radiother; 2000; 4(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 10812362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Formulation of normal tissue irradiation volumes in Co-60 and Ir-192 HDR ICBT of Ca cervix using Total Reference Air Kerma (TRAK).
Robert N; Chauhan RP; Oinam A; Rai B
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2019; 24(6):568-575. PubMed ID: 31660050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reporting of dose-volume specifications for "Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template-based interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy for gynecological cancers" according to International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements 58 with early clinical outcomes.
Sood S; Gurram L; Aravindakshan D; Paul J; Chopra S; Swamidas J; Patil A; Mahantshetty U
Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(3):550-556. PubMed ID: 33648892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survey of the use of the ICRU 38 in recording and reporting cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Pötter R; Van Limbergen E; Gerstner N; Wambersie A
Radiother Oncol; 2001 Jan; 58(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 11165676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total reference air kerma can accurately predict isodose surface volumes in cervix cancer brachytherapy. A multicenter study.
Nkiwane KS; Andersen E; Champoudry J; de Leeuw A; Swamidas J; Lindegaard J; Pötter R; Kirisits C; Tanderup K
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(6):1184-1191. PubMed ID: 28867617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of conventional and CT-based planning for intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: target volume coverage and organs at risk doses.
Onal C; Arslan G; Topkan E; Pehlivan B; Yavuz M; Oymak E; Yavuz A
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Jul; 28(1):95. PubMed ID: 19570212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT based 3-dimensional treatment planning of intracavitary brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix: comparison between dose-volume histograms and ICRU point doses to the rectum and bladder.
Hashim N; Jamalludin Z; Ung NM; Ho GF; Malik RA; Phua VC
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(13):5259-64. PubMed ID: 25040985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT-guided intracavitary radiotherapy for cervical cancer: Comparison of conventional point A plan with clinical target volume-based three-dimensional plan using dose-volume parameters.
Shin KH; Kim TH; Cho JK; Kim JY; Park SY; Park SY; Kim DY; Chie EK; Pyo HR; Cho KH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 16169676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Point vs. volumetric bladder and rectal doses in combined intracavitary-interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy: correlation and comparison with published Vienna applicator data.
Yaparpalvi R; Mutyala S; Gorla GR; Butler J; Mah D; Garg MK; Kalnicki S
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 18782683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image-guided intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervix cancer: A single institutional experience with three-dimensional CT-based planning.
Wang B; Kwon A; Zhu Y; Yeo I; Henson CF
Brachytherapy; 2009; 8(2):240-247. PubMed ID: 19230789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of radiography- and computed tomography-based treatment planning in cervix cancer in brachytherapy with specific attention to some quality assurance aspects.
Fellner C; Pötter R; Knocke TH; Wambersie A
Radiother Oncol; 2001 Jan; 58(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11165682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between CT-based volumetric calculations and ICRU reference-point estimates of radiation doses delivered to bladder and rectum during intracavitary radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Pelloski CE; Palmer M; Chronowski GM; Jhingran A; Horton J; Eifel PJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 May; 62(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 15850913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cone beam CT-based three-dimensional planning in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Al-Halabi H; Portelance L; Duclos M; Reniers B; Bahoric B; Souhami L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jul; 77(4):1092-7. PubMed ID: 19879059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Point A vs. HR-CTV D
Harmon G; Diak A; Shea SM; Yacoub JH; Small W; Harkenrider MM
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(6):825-831. PubMed ID: 27693173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomy-based definition of point A utilizing three-dimensional volumetric imaging approach for high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy dose prescription when treating cervical cancer using limited resources.
Goyal MK; Rai DV; Kehwar TS; Manjhi J; Heintz BH; Shide KL; Barker JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(6):69-77. PubMed ID: 27929482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric comparison of
Shukla AK; Jangid PK; Rajpurohit VS; Verma A; Dangayach SK; Gagrani V; Rathore NK
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(6):1212-1215. PubMed ID: 31898649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
