These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36149621)
1. Best indices of dual Scheimpflug/Placido tomographer for keratoconus detection. Heidari Z; Jafarzadehpour E; Mohammadpour M; Hashemi H Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 43(4):1353-1362. PubMed ID: 36149621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Topographic, elevation, and keratoconus indices for diagnosis of keratoconus by a combined Placido and Scheimpflug topography system. Gharieb HM; Othman IS; Oreaba AH; Abdelatif MK Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 31(4):1553-1562. PubMed ID: 33550850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early, Forme Fruste keratoconus and normal thin cornea, evaluation of sensitive parameters by combined Placido Scheimpflug topography. Gharieb HM; Abdelatif MK; Gharieb HM; Othman IS Eur J Ophthalmol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 37731321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of corneal topography, pachymetry and higher order aberrations for detecting subclinical keratoconus. Kandel S; Chaudhary M; Mishra SK; Joshi ND; Subedi M; Puri PR; Gyawali P; Bist J; Kandel H Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 May; 42(3):594-608. PubMed ID: 35147226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data. Arbelaez MC; Versaci F; Vestri G; Barboni P; Savini G Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus by wavefront parameters using Scheimpflug, Placido and Hartmann-Shack based devices. Heidari Z; Mohammadpour M; Hashemi H; Jafarzadehpur E; Moghaddasi A; Yaseri M; Fotouhi A Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 40(7):1659-1671. PubMed ID: 32219617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity and specificity of Sirius indices in diagnosis of keratoconus and suspect keratoconus. Salman A; Darwish T; Ali A; Ghabra M; Rafea Shaaban Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; ():11206721211060139. PubMed ID: 34812066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability and reliability of measurements obtained by the combined Scheimpflug and Placido-disk tomography in different stages of keratoconus. Tunç U; Akbaş YB; Yıldırım Y; Kepez Yıldız B; Kırgız A; Demirok A Eye (Lond); 2021 Aug; 35(8):2213-2220. PubMed ID: 33106613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of dual Scheimpflug imaging parameters in keratoconus, early keratoconus, and normal eyes. Reddy JC; Rapuano CJ; Cater JR; Suri K; Nagra PK; Hammersmith KM J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):582-92. PubMed ID: 24680519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus. Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Dual Scheimpflug/Placido Analysis. Golan O; Piccinini AL; Hwang ES; De Oca Gonzalez IM; Krauthammer M; Khandelwal SS; Smadja D; Randleman JB Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 201():46-53. PubMed ID: 30721688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anterior segment characteristics in normal and keratoconus eyes evaluated with a combined Scheimpflug/Placido corneal imaging device. Safarzadeh M; Nasiri N J Curr Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 28(3):106-11. PubMed ID: 27579453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in Posterior Corneal Features Between Normal Corneas and Subclinical Keratoconus. Golan O; Hwang ES; Lang P; Santhiago MR; Abulafia A; Touboul D; Krauthammer M; Smadja D J Refract Surg; 2018 Oct; 34(10):664-670. PubMed ID: 30296327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas. Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Two Scheimpflug Systems in the Measurements of Eyes with Corneal Diameter Smaller than 11.1 mm. Niu L; Ding L; Qian Y; Zhou X Ophthalmol Ther; 2023 Feb; 12(1):125-138. PubMed ID: 36244046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Keratoconus Screening Indices and Their Diagnostic Ability to Distinguish Normal From Ectatic Corneas. Shetty R; Rao H; Khamar P; Sainani K; Vunnava K; Jayadev C; Kaweri L Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep; 181():140-148. PubMed ID: 28687218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of machine learning to achieve keratoconus detection skills of a corneal expert. Cohen E; Bank D; Sorkin N; Giryes R; Varssano D Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 42(12):3837-3847. PubMed ID: 35953576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combining Placido and Corneal Wavefront Data for the Detection of Forme Fruste Keratoconus. Saad A; Gatinel D J Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 32(8):510-6. PubMed ID: 27505311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]