142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36149784)
1. Patient preferences in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Zhu M; Dong D; Lo HH; Wong SY; Mo PK; Sit RW
Pain; 2023 Apr; 164(4):675-689. PubMed ID: 36149784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Collacott H; Zhang D; Heidenreich S; Tervonen T
Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 34250574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patients' Preferences for Outcome, Process and Cost Attributes in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.
Bien DR; Danner M; Vennedey V; Civello D; Evers SM; Hiligsmann M
Patient; 2017 Oct; 10(5):553-565. PubMed ID: 28364387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patients' preferences for the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Tünneßen M; Hiligsmann M; Stock S; Vennedey V
J Med Econ; 2020 Jun; 23(6):546-556. PubMed ID: 32011209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient Preferences in Targeted Pharmacotherapy for Cancers: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.
Jiang S; Ren R; Gu Y; Jeet V; Liu P; Li S
Pharmacoeconomics; 2023 Jan; 41(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 36372823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alignment of preferences in the treatment of multiple myeloma - a discrete choice experiment of patient, carer, physician, and nurse preferences.
Fifer SJ; Ho KA; Lybrand S; Axford LJ; Roach S
BMC Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(1):546. PubMed ID: 32527324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Harrison M; Milbers K; Hudson M; Bansback N
BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014719. PubMed ID: 28515194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the inclusion of a cost attribute result in different preferences for the surgical treatment of primary basal cell carcinoma?: a comparison of two discrete-choice experiments.
Essers BA; van Helvoort-Postulart D; Prins MH; Neumann M; Dirksen CD
Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(6):507-20. PubMed ID: 20387912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward Patient-Centered Telerehabilitation Design: Understanding Chronic Pain Patients' Preferences for Web-Based Exercise Telerehabilitation Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.
Cranen K; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Vollenbroek-Hutten MM; IJzerman MJ
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jan; 19(1):e26. PubMed ID: 28108429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stakeholders' preferences for the design and delivery of virtual care services: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Vo LK; Allen MJ; Cunich M; Thillainadesan J; McPhail SM; Sharma P; Wallis S; McGowan K; Carter HE
Soc Sci Med; 2024 Jan; 340():116459. PubMed ID: 38048738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of understanding patient and physician preferences for psoriasis treatment characteristics: a systematic review of discrete-choice experiments.
Sain N; Willems D; Charokopou M; Hiligsmann M
Curr Med Res Opin; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1257-1275. PubMed ID: 32468865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Attributes in stated preference elicitation studies on colorectal cancer screening and their relative importance for decision-making among screenees: a systematic review.
Brinkmann M; Fricke LM; Diedrich L; Robra BP; Krauth C; Dreier M
Health Econ Rev; 2022 Sep; 12(1):49. PubMed ID: 36136248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of physicians' perspectives versus patients' preferences: direct assessment and discrete choice experiments in the therapy of multiple myeloma.
Mühlbacher AC; Nübling M
Eur J Health Econ; 2011 Jun; 12(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 20107856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Women's preferences for attributes of first-trimester miscarriage management: a stated preference discrete-choice experiment.
Petrou S; McIntosh E
Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 18798807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel design process for selection of attributes for inclusion in discrete choice experiments: case study exploring variation in clinical decision-making about thrombolysis in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke.
De Brún A; Flynn D; Ternent L; Price CI; Rodgers H; Ford GA; Rudd M; Lancsar E; Simpson S; Teah J; Thomson RG
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 18(1):483. PubMed ID: 29929523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chronic pain patients' treatment preferences: a discrete-choice experiment.
Mühlbacher AC; Junker U; Juhnke C; Stemmler E; Kohlmann T; Leverkus F; Nübling M
Eur J Health Econ; 2015 Jul; 16(6):613-28. PubMed ID: 24950770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient preferences for epilepsy treatment: a systematic review of discrete choice experimental studies.
Al-Aqeel S; Alotaiwi R; Albugami B
Health Econ Rev; 2023 Mar; 13(1):17. PubMed ID: 36933108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.
Harrison M; Rigby D; Vass C; Flynn T; Louviere J; Payne K
Patient; 2014; 7(2):151-70. PubMed ID: 24566923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preferences for antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C: a discrete choice experiment.
Mühlbacher AC; Bridges JF; Bethge S; Dintsios CM; Schwalm A; Gerber-Grote A; Nübling M
Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Mar; 18(2):155-165. PubMed ID: 26846922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
