These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36150198)

  • 21. Fluctuating Dynamics of Mate Availability Promote the Evolution of Flexible Choosiness in Both Sexes.
    Chevalier L; Labonne J; Galipaud M; Dechaume-Moncharmont FX
    Am Nat; 2020 Dec; 196(6):730-742. PubMed ID: 33211564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diversification under sexual selection: the relative roles of mate preference strength and the degree of divergence in mate preferences.
    Rodríguez RL; Boughman JW; Gray DA; Hebets EA; Höbel G; Symes LB
    Ecol Lett; 2013 Aug; 16(8):964-74. PubMed ID: 23809185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variation in female mate choice within guppy populations: population divergence, multiple ornaments and the maintenance of polymorphism.
    Brooks R
    Genetica; 2002 Nov; 116(2-3):343-58. PubMed ID: 12555789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modality interactions alter the shape of acoustic mate preference functions in gray treefrogs.
    Reichert MS; Höbel G
    Evolution; 2015 Sep; 69(9):2384-98. PubMed ID: 26282702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A multivariate analysis of genetic variation in the advertisement call of the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor.
    Welch AM; Smith MJ; Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2014 Jun; 68(6):1629-39. PubMed ID: 24621402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mate choice strategies in a spatially-explicit model environment.
    Ferreira GBS; Scheutz M; Boyd SK
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202680. PubMed ID: 30138426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Direct fitness benefits explain mate preference, but not choice, for similarity in heterozygosity levels.
    Zandberg L; Gort G; van Oers K; Hinde CA
    Ecol Lett; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1306-1314. PubMed ID: 28868784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Synergistic selection between ecological niche and mate preference primes diversification.
    Boughman JW; Svanbäck R
    Evolution; 2017 Jan; 71(1):6-22. PubMed ID: 27748954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Glucocorticoids, male sexual signals, and mate choice by females: Implications for sexual selection.
    Leary CJ; Baugh AT
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2020 Mar; 288():113354. PubMed ID: 31830474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mate sampling and choosiness in the sand goby.
    Lindström K; Lehtonen TK
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Aug; 280(1765):20130983. PubMed ID: 23804620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Progesterone and prostaglandin F2α induce species-typical female preferences for male sexual displays in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).
    Ward JL; Love EK; Baugh AT; Gordon NM; Tanner JC; Bee MA
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Dec; 152(Pt A):280-7. PubMed ID: 26454212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Familiarity adds to attractiveness in matters of siskin mate choice.
    Senar JC; Mateos-Gonzalez F; Uribe F; Arroyo L
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Dec; 280(1773):20132361. PubMed ID: 24174112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Females alter their mate preferences depending on hybridization risk.
    Calabrese GM; Pfennig KS
    Biol Lett; 2022 Nov; 18(11):20220310. PubMed ID: 36382373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict.
    Baldauf SA; Kullmann H; Schroth SH; Thünken T; Bakker TC
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 9():129. PubMed ID: 19515244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Woe is the loner: Female treefrogs prefer clusters of displaying males over single "hotshot" males.
    Stratman KD; Oldehoeft EA; Höbel G
    Evolution; 2021 Dec; 75(12):3026-3036. PubMed ID: 34626427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mate Choice versus Mate Preference: Inferences about Color-Assortative Mating Differ between Field and Lab Assays of Poison Frog Behavior.
    Yang Y; Blomenkamp S; Dugas MB; Richards-Zawacki CL; Pröhl H
    Am Nat; 2019 Apr; 193(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 30912970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does competition allow male mate choosiness in threespine sticklebacks?
    Candolin U; Salesto T
    Am Nat; 2009 Feb; 173(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 19117472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Unexpected male choosiness for mates in a spider.
    Bel-Venner MC; Dray S; Allainé D; Menu F; Venner S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Jan; 275(1630):77-82. PubMed ID: 17956845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Curves as traits: genetic and environmental variation in mate preference functions.
    Rodríguez RL; Hallett AC; Kilmer JT; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Feb; 26(2):434-42. PubMed ID: 23252651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.