BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36150940)

  • 21. Percutaneous versus surgical approach to aortic valve replacement with coronary revascularization: A systematic review andmeta-analysis.
    Guo Y; Zhang W; Wu H
    Perfusion; 2023 May; ():2676591231178894. PubMed ID: 37224394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of Flow on Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Abbas AE; Ternacle J; Pibarot P; Xu K; Alu M; Rogers E; Hahn RT; Leon M; Thourani VH
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Aug; 14(8):e012364. PubMed ID: 34387097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies.
    Witberg G; Lador A; Yahav D; Kornowski R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):408-416. PubMed ID: 29388308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.
    Elbadawi A; Saad M; Elgendy IY; Barssoum K; Omer MA; Soliman A; Almahmoud MF; Ogunbayo GO; Mentias A; Gilani S; Jneid H; Aronow HD; Kleiman N; Abbott JD
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(18):1811-1822. PubMed ID: 31537280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Trends in Utilization and Propensity-Matched Analysis of In-Hospital Outcomes.
    Gupta T; Khera S; Kolte D; Goel K; Kalra A; Villablanca PA; Aronow HD; Abbott JD; Fonarow GC; Taub CC; Kleiman NS; Weisz G; Inglessis I; Elmariah S; Rihal CS; Garcia MJ; Bhatt DL
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Apr; 11(4):e006179. PubMed ID: 29643130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-surgical-risk patients: An updated meta-analysis.
    Goel S; Pasam RT; Wats K; Patel J; Chava S; Gotesman J; Malik BA; Frankel R; Shani J; Gidwani U
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):169-178. PubMed ID: 31631514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The safety of concomitant transcatheter aortic valve replacement and percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang Y; Huang FY; Huang BT; Xiong TY; Pu XB; Chen SJ; Chen M; Feng Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(48):e8919. PubMed ID: 29310382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: Evidence from a meta-analysis.
    Sardar P; Kundu A; Chatterjee S; Feldman DN; Owan T; Kakouros N; Nairooz R; Pape LA; Feldman T; Dawn Abbott J; Elmariah S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 90(3):504-515. PubMed ID: 28398671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of rehabilitation outcomes for transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement as redo procedure in patients with previous cardiac surgery: Evidence based on 11 observational studies.
    Wang G; Li X; Zhang Z; Dong J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Nov; 100(45):e27657. PubMed ID: 34766568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Surgical versus Interventional Treatment of Concomitant Aortic Valve Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease.
    Elderia A; Gerfer S; Eghbalzadeh K; Adam M; Baldus S; Rahmanian P; Kuhn E; Wahlers T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Dec; 71(8):620-631. PubMed ID: 36549305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Søndergaard L; Steinbrüchel DA; Ihlemann N; Nissen H; Kjeldsen BJ; Petursson P; Ngo AT; Olsen NT; Chang Y; Franzen OW; Engstrøm T; Clemmensen P; Olsen PS; Thyregod HG
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27296202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Incidence, treatment, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction following transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Isogai T; Saad AM; Ahuja KR; Shekhar S; Abdelfattah OM; Gad MM; Svensson LG; Krishnaswamy A; Reed GW; Puri R; Tuzcu EM; Ellis SG; Kapadia SR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):877-888. PubMed ID: 34236762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cardiovascular Outcomes with Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Kundu A; Sardar P; Malhotra R; Qureshi WT; Kakouros N
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 31669113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical Outcomes of Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.
    Altibi AM; Ghanem F; Hammad F; Patel J; Song HK; Golwala H; Zahr FE; Rahmouni H
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2022 Nov; 47(11):101339. PubMed ID: 35908687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Swift SL; Puehler T; Misso K; Lang SH; Forbes C; Kleijnen J; Danner M; Kuhn C; Haneya A; Seoudy H; Cremer J; Frey N; Lutter G; Wolff R; Scheibler F; Wehkamp K; Frank D
    BMJ Open; 2021 Dec; 11(12):e054222. PubMed ID: 34873012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.
    Thandra A; Abusnina W; Jhand A; Shaikh K; Bansal R; Pajjuru VS; Al-Abdouh A; Kanmanthareddy A; Alla VM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jun; 97(7):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 33580743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in moderate and high-risk patients: a meta-analysis.
    Carnero-Alcázar M; Maroto LC; Cobiella-Carnicer J; Vilacosta I; Nombela-Franco L; Alswies A; Villagrán-Medinilla E; Macaya C
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Apr; 51(4):644-652. PubMed ID: 28007879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Meta-analysis of transfemoral TAVR versus surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Arora S; Vaidya SR; Strassle PD; Misenheimer JA; Rhodes JA; Ramm CJ; Wheeler EN; Caranasos TG; Cavender MA; Vavalle JP
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):806-812. PubMed ID: 29068166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Short-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Isolated Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Mediastinal Radiation-Associated Severe Aortic Stenosis.
    Nauffal V; Bay C; Shah PB; Sobieszczyk PS; Kaneko T; O'Gara P; Nohria A
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Feb; 14(2):e010009. PubMed ID: 33541102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Results of surgical aortic valve replacement and transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Onorati F; D'Onofrio A; Biancari F; Salizzoni S; De Feo M; Agrifoglio M; Mariscalco G; Lucchetti V; Messina A; Musumeci F; Santarpino G; Esposito G; Santini F; Magagna P; Beghi C; Aiello M; Ratta ED; Savini C; Troise G; Cassese M; Fischlein T; Glauber M; Passerone G; Punta G; Juvonen T; Alfieri O; Gabbieri D; Mangino D; Agostinelli A; Livi U; Di Gregorio O; Minati A; Rinaldi M; Gerosa G; Faggian G;
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 22(6):806-12. PubMed ID: 26979656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.