133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36152438)
1. Trends, events and potential sources of Xe-detections in the German radioxenon network.
Bollhöfer A; Brander S; Krais R; Schmid S; Walzer V; Ross O; Schlosser C
J Environ Radioact; 2022 Dec; 255():106989. PubMed ID: 36152438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Setting the baseline for estimated background observations at IMS systems of four radioxenon isotopes in 2014.
Gueibe C; Kalinowski MB; Baré J; Gheddou A; Krysta M; Kusmierczyk-Michulec J
J Environ Radioact; 2017 Nov; 178-179():297-314. PubMed ID: 28942373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phase II testing of Xenon International on Mount Schauinsland, Germany.
Brander S; Baur S; Krais R; Ross JO; Orr A; Sayne R; Howard M; Mayer M; Panisko M; Hayes JC; Bollhöfer A
J Environ Radioact; 2022 Dec; 255():107034. PubMed ID: 36274504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Overview of temporary radioxenon background measurement campaigns conducted for the CTBTO between 2008 and 2018.
Baré J; Gheddou A; Kalinowski MB
J Environ Radioact; 2023 Feb; 257():107053. PubMed ID: 36375403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intercomparison experiments of systems for the measurement of xenon radionuclides in the atmosphere.
Auer M; Axelsson A; Blanchard X; Bowyer TW; Brachet G; Bulowski I; Dubasov Y; Elmgren K; Fontaine JP; Harms W; Hayes JC; Heimbigner TR; McIntyre JI; Panisko ME; Popov Y; Ringbom A; Sartorius H; Schmid S; Schulze J; Schlosser C; Taffary T; Weiss W; Wernsperger B
Appl Radiat Isot; 2004 Jun; 60(6):863-77. PubMed ID: 15110352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of near-background concentrations of Argon-37 and Xenon-133 in the atmosphere.
Fritz BG; Alexander T; Bowyer T; Hayes J; Mace E; Woods V
J Environ Radioact; 2021 Jul; 233():106590. PubMed ID: 33798811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterisation of Xe-133 background at the IMS stations in the East Asian region: Insights based on known sources and atmospheric transport modelling.
Kuśmierczyk-Michulec J; Baré J; Kalinowski M; Tipka A
J Environ Radioact; 2022 Dec; 255():107033. PubMed ID: 36252400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
Ranjbar L; Farsoni AT; Becker EM
J Environ Radioact; 2017 Apr; 169-170():221-228. PubMed ID: 28161604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence on the radioxenon background during the temporary suspension of operations of three major medical isotope production facilities in the Northern Hemisphere and during the start-up of another facility in the Southern Hemisphere.
Saey PR; Auer M; Becker A; Hoffmann E; Nikkinen M; Ringbom A; Tinker R; Schlosser C; Sonck M
J Environ Radioact; 2010 Sep; 101(9):730-8. PubMed ID: 20554098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Global emission inventory of
Kalinowski MB
J Environ Radioact; 2023 May; 261():107121. PubMed ID: 36739703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A stilbene - CdZnTe based radioxenon detection system.
Gadey HR; Farsoni AT; Czyz SA; McGee KD
J Environ Radioact; 2019 Aug; 204():117-124. PubMed ID: 31029985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radioxenon spiked air.
Watrous MG; Delmore JE; Hague RK; Houghton TP; Jenson DD; Mann NR
J Environ Radioact; 2015 Dec; 150():126-31. PubMed ID: 26318775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New evaluated radioxenon decay data and its implications in nuclear explosion monitoring.
Galan M; Kalinowski M; Gheddou A; Yamba K
J Environ Radioact; 2018 Dec; 192():628-634. PubMed ID: 29525110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Projected network performance for multiple isotopes using next-generation xenon monitoring systems.
Eslinger PW; Ely JH; Lowrey JD; Miley HS
J Environ Radioact; 2022 Oct; 251-252():106963. PubMed ID: 35868224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of environmental radioxenon detections in the UK.
Goodwin MA; Davies AV; Britton R
J Environ Radioact; 2021 Aug; 234():106629. PubMed ID: 33989843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. International challenge to predict the impact of radioxenon releases from medical isotope production on a comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty sampling station.
Eslinger PW; Bowyer TW; Achim P; Chai T; Deconninck B; Freeman K; Generoso S; Hayes P; Heidmann V; Hoffman I; Kijima Y; Krysta M; Malo A; Maurer C; Ngan F; Robins P; Ross JO; Saunier O; Schlosser C; Schöppner M; Schrom BT; Seibert P; Stein AF; Ungar K; Yi J
J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jun; 157():41-51. PubMed ID: 26998569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Examining the potential for detecting simultaneous noble gas and aerosol samples in the international monitoring system radionuclide network.
Eslinger PW; Burnett JL; Lowrey JD; Milbrath BD; Sarathi R
J Environ Radioact; 2024 Feb; 272():107349. PubMed ID: 38061191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 6 months of radioxenon detection in western Europe with the SPALAX-New generation system - Part 2: Atmospheric transport modelling.
Achim P; Generoso S; Topin S; Gross P; Monfort M; Moulin C; Le Petit G; Douysset G; Morin M
J Environ Radioact; 2021 Jan; 226():106455. PubMed ID: 33161354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impacts of future nuclear power generation on the international monitoring system.
Eslinger PW; Doll CG; Bowyer TW; Friese JI; Metz LA; Sarathi RS
J Environ Radioact; 2024 Mar; 273():107383. PubMed ID: 38237239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Time resolution requirements for civilian radioxenon emission data for the CTBT verification regime.
De Meutter P; Camps J; Delcloo A; Deconninck B; Termonia P
J Environ Radioact; 2018 Feb; 182():117-127. PubMed ID: 29223860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]