These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36153018)

  • 1. Development of the OPAL prediction model for prediction of live birth in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss: protocol for a prospective and retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands.
    Youssef A; van der Hoorn ML; van Eekelen R; van Geloven N; van Wely M; Smits MAJ; Mulders A; van Lith JM; Goddijn M; Lashley E
    BMJ Open; 2022 Sep; 12(9):e062402. PubMed ID: 36153018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the role of paternal factors in aetiology and prognosis of recurrent pregnancy loss: study protocol for a hospital-based multicentre case-control study and cohort study (REMI III project).
    du Fossé N; van der Hoorn ML; Eikmans M; Heidt S; le Cessie S; Mulders A; van Lith J; Lashley E
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033095. PubMed ID: 31727666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External validation of a frequently used prediction model for ongoing pregnancy in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Youssef A; van der Hoorn MLP; Dongen M; Visser J; Bloemenkamp K; van Lith J; van Geloven N; Lashley EELO
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 37(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 34875054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time to conception and time to live birth in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.
    Kaandorp SP; van Mens TE; Middeldorp S; Hutten BA; Hof MH; van der Post JA; van der Veen F; Goddijn M
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1146-52. PubMed ID: 24682612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of PGS2.0 versus conventional embryo morphology evaluation for patients with recurrent pregnancy loss: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised trial.
    Lei C; Sui Y; Ye J; Lu Y; Xi J; Sun Y; Jin L; Sun X
    BMJ Open; 2020 Oct; 10(10):e036252. PubMed ID: 33033011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. International Natural Procreative Technology Evaluation and Surveillance of Treatment for Subfertility (iNEST): enrollment and methods.
    Stanford JB; Parnell T; Kantor K; Reeder MR; Najmabadi S; Johnson K; Musso I; Hartman H; Tham E; Winter I; Galczynski K; Carus A; Sherlock A; Golden Tevald J; Barczentewicz M; Meier B; Carpentier P; Poehailos K; Chasuk R; Danis P; Lipscomb L
    Hum Reprod Open; 2022; 2022(3):hoac033. PubMed ID: 35974874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): a SART-CORS study.
    Bhatt SJ; Marchetto NM; Roy J; Morelli SS; McGovern PG
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul; 36(8):2339-2344. PubMed ID: 34027546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure.
    Sato T; Sugiura-Ogasawara M; Ozawa F; Yamamoto T; Kato T; Kurahashi H; Kuroda T; Aoyama N; Kato K; Kobayashi R; Fukuda A; Utsunomiya T; Kuwahara A; Saito H; Takeshita T; Irahara M
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Dec; 34(12):2340-2348. PubMed ID: 31811307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cumulative live birth rates following miscarriage in an initial complete cycle of IVF: a retrospective cohort study of 112 549 women.
    Cameron NJ; Bhattacharya S; Bhattacharya S; McLernon DJ
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 32(11):2287-2297. PubMed ID: 29040570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting the chances of having a baby with or without treatment at different time points in couples with unexplained subfertility.
    McLernon DJ; Lee AJ; Maheshwari A; van Eekelen R; van Geloven N; Putter H; Eijkemans MJ; van der Steeg JW; van der Veen F; Steyerberg EW; Mol BW; Bhattacharya S
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1126-1138. PubMed ID: 31119290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What is the prognosis for a live birth after unexplained recurrent implantation failure following IVF/ICSI?
    Koot YEM; Hviid Saxtorph M; Goddijn M; de Bever S; Eijkemans MJC; Wely MV; van der Veen F; Fauser BCJM; Macklon NS
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2044-2052. PubMed ID: 31621857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients.
    Popescu F; Jaslow CR; Kutteh WH
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr; 33(4):579-587. PubMed ID: 29538673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of paternal and maternal factors on the prognosis of live birth in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Peuranpää PL; Gissler M; Peltopuro P; Tiitinen A; Hautamäki H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Dec; 101(12):1374-1385. PubMed ID: 36210542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recurrent miscarriage in translocation carriers: no differences in clinical characteristics between couples who accept and couples who decline PGD.
    De Krom G; Arens YH; Coonen E; Van Ravenswaaij-Arts CM; Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Evers JL; Van Golde RJ; De Die-Smulders CE
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):484-9. PubMed ID: 25432924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence and Treatment Choices for Couples with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Due to Structural Chromosomal Anomalies.
    Maithripala S; Durland U; Havelock J; Kashyap S; Hitkari J; Tan J; Iews M; Lisonkova S; Bedaiwy MA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Jun; 40(6):655-662. PubMed ID: 29276169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproductive performance of women with and without intrauterine adhesions following recurrent dilatation and curettage for miscarriage: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    Hooker AB; de Leeuw RA; Twisk JWR; Brölmann HAM; Huirne JAF
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jan; 36(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 33320197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward more accurate prediction of future pregnancy outcome in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: taking both partners into account.
    du Fossé NA; van der Hoorn MP; de Koning R; Mulders AGMGJ; van Lith JMM; le Cessie S; Lashley EELO
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Jan; 117(1):144-152. PubMed ID: 34863518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A proposed prognostic prediction tool for a live birth among women with recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Bashiri A; Giliutin M; Ziedenberg H; Plakht Y; Baumfeld Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Oct; 35(19):3736-3742. PubMed ID: 33135531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chance of live birth: a nationwide, registry-based cohort study.
    Kolte AM; Westergaard D; Lidegaard Ø; Brunak S; Nielsen HS
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar; 36(4):1065-1073. PubMed ID: 33394013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction model for live birth in ICSI using testicular extracted sperm.
    Meijerink AM; Cissen M; Mochtar MH; Fleischer K; Thoonen I; de Melker AA; Meissner A; Repping S; Braat DD; van Wely M; Ramos L
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Sep; 31(9):1942-51. PubMed ID: 27406949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.