These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36154110)

  • 1. Language-familiarity effect on voice recognition by blind listeners.
    Zhang L; Li Y; Zhou H; Zhang Y; Shu H
    JASA Express Lett; 2021 May; 1(5):055201. PubMed ID: 36154110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Voice-based assessments of trustworthiness, competence, and warmth in blind and sighted adults.
    Oleszkiewicz A; Pisanski K; Lachowicz-Tabaczek K; Sorokowska A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):856-862. PubMed ID: 27739036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How does familiarity with a voice affect trait judgements?
    Lavan N; Mileva M; McGettigan C
    Br J Psychol; 2021 Feb; 112(1):282-300. PubMed ID: 32445499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of familiarity on within-person age judgements from voices.
    Lavan N
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Feb; 113(1):287-299. PubMed ID: 34415575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Superiority of blind over sighted listeners in voice recognition.
    Pang W; Xing H; Zhang L; Shu H; Zhang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Aug; 148(2):EL208. PubMed ID: 32873006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Voice recognition: effects of orienting task, and a test of blind versus sighted listeners.
    Winograd E; Kerr NH; Spence MJ
    Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 6721008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural basis of language familiarity effects on voice recognition: An fNIRS study.
    Meng Y; Liang C; Chen W; Liu Z; Yang C; Hu J; Gao Z; Gao S
    Cortex; 2024 Jul; 176():1-10. PubMed ID: 38723449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human voice recognition depends on language ability.
    Perrachione TK; Del Tufo SN; Gabrieli JD
    Science; 2011 Jul; 333(6042):595. PubMed ID: 21798942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Highly accurate and robust identity perception from personally familiar voices.
    Kanber E; Lavan N; McGettigan C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Apr; 151(4):897-911. PubMed ID: 34672658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The mechanism of phonetic information in voice identity discrimination: a comparative study based on sighted and blind people.
    Ming L; Geng L; Zhao X; Wang Y; Hu N; Yang Y; Hu X
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1352692. PubMed ID: 38845764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential neural contributions to native- and foreign-language talker identification.
    Perrachione TK; Pierrehumbert JB; Wong PC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1950-60. PubMed ID: 19968445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Familiarity and task context shape the use of acoustic information in voice identity perception.
    Lavan N; Kreitewolf J; Obleser J; McGettigan C
    Cognition; 2021 Oct; 215():104780. PubMed ID: 34298232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Takayanagi S; Dirks DD; Moshfegh A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Jun; 45(3):585-97. PubMed ID: 12069010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The voice-recognition accuracy of blind listeners.
    Bull R; Rathborn H; Clifford BR
    Perception; 1983; 12(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 6657428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Talker and accent familiarity yield advantages for voice identity perception: A voice sorting study.
    Njie S; Lavan N; McGettigan C
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Jan; 51(1):175-187. PubMed ID: 35274221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of language familiarity in voice identification.
    Goggin JP; Thompson CP; Strube G; Simental LR
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Sep; 19(5):448-58. PubMed ID: 1956306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
    Ben-David BM; Avivi-Reich M; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. People with larger social networks show poorer voice recognition.
    Lev-Ari S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Mar; 75(3):450-460. PubMed ID: 34165366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Talker-familiarity benefit in non-native recognition memory and word identification: The role of listening conditions and proficiency.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1675-1697. PubMed ID: 30834484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice.
    Case J; Seyfarth S; Levi SV
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 May; 61(5):1251-1260. PubMed ID: 29800358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.