These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36154160)

  • 1. Perception of interrupted speech and text: Listener and modality factors.
    Fogerty D; Dubno JR; Shafiro V
    JASA Express Lett; 2022 Jun; 2(6):064402. PubMed ID: 36154160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Nicholas JG
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 23652814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word recognition within a linguistic context: effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability, and cognitive function.
    Benichov J; Cox LC; Tun PA; Wingfield A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 21918453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognition of Sentences With Complex Syntax in Speech Babble by Adolescents With Normal Hearing or Cochlear Implants.
    Nittrouer S; Lowenstein JH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Mar; 66(3):1110-1135. PubMed ID: 36758200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Influence of Linguistic Proficiency on Masked Text Recognition Performance in Adults With and Without Congenital Hearing Impairment.
    Huysmans E; Bolk E; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; de Groot AM; Goverts ST
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):547-59. PubMed ID: 26974221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual Organization of Interrupted Speech and Text.
    Shafiro V; Fogerty D; Smith K; Sheft S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Oct; 61(10):2578-2588. PubMed ID: 30458532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How does linguistic complexity influence intelligibility in a German audiometric sentence intelligibility test?
    Uslar V; Ruigendijk E; Hamann C; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Sep; 50(9):621-31. PubMed ID: 21714708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise-Vocoded Sentence Recognition and the Use of Context in Older and Younger Adult Listeners.
    Moberly AC; Varadarajan VV; Tamati TN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 66(1):365-381. PubMed ID: 36475738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.
    Besser J; Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Jun; 17(2):75-93. PubMed ID: 23945955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech understanding in noise in elderly adults: the effect of inhibitory control and syntactic complexity.
    van Knijff EC; Coene M; Govaerts PJ
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2018 May; 53(3):628-642. PubMed ID: 29446191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition of Interrupted Speech, Text, and Text-Supplemented Speech by Older Adults: Effect of Interruption Rate.
    Fogerty D; Madorskiy R; Vickery B; Shafiro V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Nov; 65(11):4404-4416. PubMed ID: 36251884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.
    Braza MD; Corbin NE; Buss E; Monson BB
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 34260434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reading Behind the Lines: The Factors Affecting the Text Reception Threshold in Hearing Aid Users.
    Zekveld AA; Pronk M; Danielsson H; Rönnberg J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):762-775. PubMed ID: 29450534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of age and hearing loss on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Shafiro V; Sheft S; Risley R; Gygi B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):745-56. PubMed ID: 25698009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiovisual Enhancement of Speech Perception in Noise by School-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    Lalonde K; McCreery RW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):705-719. PubMed ID: 32032226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognising foreign-accented speech of varying intelligibility and linguistic complexity: insights from older listeners with or without hearing loss.
    Strori D; Bradlow AR; Souza PE
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Feb; 60(2):140-150. PubMed ID: 32972283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.
    Koeritzer MA; Rogers CS; Van Engen KJ; Peelle JE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):740-751. PubMed ID: 29450493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.