These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36154160)

  • 21. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
    Ben-David BM; Avivi-Reich M; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bilingualism and Speech Understanding in Noise: Auditory and Linguistic Factors.
    Skoe E; Karayanidi K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):115-130. PubMed ID: 30461397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do age and linguistic background alter the audiovisual advantage when listening to speech in the presence of energetic and informational masking?
    Avivi-Reich M; Puka K; Schneider BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):242-261. PubMed ID: 29039045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception.
    Sheft S; Shafiro V; Lorenzi C; McMullen R; Farrell C
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):709-20. PubMed ID: 22790319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reconstructing wholes from parts: effects of modality, age, and hearing loss on word recognition.
    Krull V; Humes LE; Kidd GR
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):e14-23. PubMed ID: 23165223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Older adult recognition error patterns when listening to interrupted speech and speech in steady-state noise.
    Smith KG; Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3428. PubMed ID: 34852602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Errors on a Speech-in-Babble Sentence Recognition Test Reveal Individual Differences in Acoustic Phonetic Perception and Babble Misallocations.
    Bernstein LE; Eberhardt SP; Auer ET
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):673-690. PubMed ID: 33928926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intelligibility of British- and American-Accented Sentences for American Younger and Older Listeners With and Without Hearing Loss.
    Schilaty S; Ferguson SH; Morgan SD; Champougny C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Jan; 32(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 33321538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Sep; 150(3):1979. PubMed ID: 34598610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of age and hearing loss on the recognition of interrupted words in isolation and in sentences.
    Kidd GR; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1434-48. PubMed ID: 22352515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
    Winn MB; Moore AN
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.
    Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):203-18. PubMed ID: 19194292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Increase in speech recognition due to linguistic mismatch between target and masker speech: monolingual and simultaneous bilingual performance.
    Calandruccio L; Zhou H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 57(3):1089-97. PubMed ID: 24167230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recognition of interrupted sentences under conditions of spectral degradation.
    Chatterjee M; Peredo F; Nelson D; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):EL37-41. PubMed ID: 20136176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.