These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36154160)

  • 41. Recognition of asynchronous auditory-visual speech by younger and older listeners: A preliminary study.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ; Willison HM; Freund MS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):151. PubMed ID: 28764460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Perceptual learning alters effects of foreign language backgrounds in speech-in-speech recognition.
    Olmstead AJ; Viswanathan N; Albor J; Billetdeaux O
    JASA Express Lett; 2022 Aug; 2(8):. PubMed ID: 37311183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of linguistic properties and hearing impairment on visual speech perception skills in the German language.
    Suess N; Hauswald A; Zehentner V; Depireux J; Herzog G; Rösch S; Weisz N
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0275585. PubMed ID: 36178907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Perceptual learning of temporally interrupted spectrally degraded speech.
    Benard MR; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1344. PubMed ID: 25190407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Interrupted speech perception: the effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution.
    Jin SH; Nelson PB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):881-9. PubMed ID: 20707457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Speech recognition in multitalker babble using digits, words, and sentences.
    McArdle RA; Wilson RH; Burks CA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):726-39; quiz 763-4. PubMed ID: 16515143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Text Captioning Buffers Against the Effects of Background Noise and Hearing Loss on Memory for Speech.
    Payne BR; Silcox JW; Crandell HA; Lash A; Ferguson SH; Lohani M
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 34260436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss.
    Shafiro V; Sheft S; Risley R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):455-65. PubMed ID: 26827039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation.
    Bologna WJ; Vaden KI; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):267. PubMed ID: 30075693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.
    Calandruccio L; Bradlow AR; Dhar S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Assessing speech recognition abilities with digits in noise in cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Kaandorp MW; Smits C; Merkus P; Goverts ST; Festen JM
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 25156097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sentence recognition with modulation-filtered speech segments for younger and older adults: Effects of hearing impairment and cognition.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Nov; 154(5):3328-3343. PubMed ID: 37983296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Effect of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Linguistic Processing in a Semantic Judgment Task: An Aging Study.
    Stanley N; Davis T; Estis J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):209-221. PubMed ID: 28277212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):342-59. PubMed ID: 20649229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effects of aging on speech perception in noise: comparison between normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Jin SH; Liu C; Sladen DP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(7):656-65. PubMed ID: 25365368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Acoustic and linguistic factors in the perception of bandpass-filtered speech.
    Stickney GS; Assmann PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1157-65. PubMed ID: 11303929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Speech Recognition Abilities in Normal-Hearing Children 4 to 12 Years of Age in Stationary and Interrupted Noise.
    Koopmans WJA; Goverts ST; Smits C
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1091-1103. PubMed ID: 29554035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Recognition of accented English in quiet by younger normal-hearing listeners and older listeners with normal-hearing and hearing loss.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):444-55. PubMed ID: 20649238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.